GARRETT: Can you tell the country, sir, how you are content, with all the fanfare of this deal, to leave the conscience of this nation, the strength of this nation unaccounted for in relation to [the four Americans currently jailed in Iran]…
OBAMA: I’ve got to give you credit for how you craft those questions. First of all, the notion that I am “content” [pause] as I “celebrate” with American citizens languishing in Iranian jail [pause]… Major, that’s nonsense. And you should know better.
Major Garrett just pulled a Helen Thomas on Obama- and rather than act presidential (like all of his predecessors) and respond to tangential questions that have little connection to the issue at hand in a respectful manner- Obama blew up and acted petty and petulant.
(For those that don't remember or never knew- Helen Thomas was a White House reporter for many decades and was known for pointed questions asked in a 'disrespectful manner' of many presidents.)
Now while I do agree with Obama in that hostages held should not be used as bargaining tools for other unrelated issues- the fact that he made a deal about potentially devastating nuclear weapons that could kill millions with a nation's tyrannical leadership THAT WOULD HOLD HOSTAGES in the FIRST PLACE should give one pause.
It's clear that Obama's ego and a need for a 'legacy' trumps all other considerations.
A nuclear arms race in the Middle East?
A murderous theocratic tyranny with nuclear bombs?
Meh- all are meaningless against what could be a diplomatic 'triumph' for this president.