![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/ ... ly-big-one
I'm not going to freak out about it either. You can't worry about something that you can't see coming. But it is prudent to take precautions, like bolting down heavy bookcases, pictures and large mirrors and keeping stocks of non-perishable food and water. What I worry about in my case, are those concrete tiles on my roof, which are quite heavy. They won't necessarily fall off the roof, they are nailed down, but their combined weight on the highest part of my house worries me. The mass of the roof would tend to stay still while the foundation would be moving with the earth. If there happened to be snow up there, it would be even heavier. I see major damage, even collapse, if a quake is violent enough. Something lighter is the way to go. Besides, metal roofs, if kept free of debris, won't grow moss on them like my concrete tiles do.Duper wrote:*yawn*![]()
I've seen this posted all over facebook for a week or so now. One. It's PURE speculation. All of us in the NW know about "the big one". There is no way they can substantiate the "when". .. that's like saying "you're going to die some day!"![]()
...ya think? ;D
What they fail to mention is that there have been constant sizeable quakes off the coast of Oregon for over a decade. There are also microquakes nearly daily throughout the NW. This is pressure being release.
Now, if you want to talk damage. OHSU has built up a new campus on the river front in Portland over the last 10 years. It's very impressive and shiny. However. 5 years before they broke ground, a survey of the entire Portland downtown area was done on what kind of soil the city was sitting on and what would happen in the event of a major earthquake. That whole chunk of land from the Marcum bridge up to nearly John's Landing will LIQUIFY in the case of a 8.0 earthquake. Why would they do that? .. oh.. there's an underground parking garage there too.
I'm not going to freek over something that I can't change. It certainly is a good idea to have disaster preparedness kits in the house and all that. We took a large picture off the wall that hung over a bed after a rather large earthquake several years ago.Oh, that's another thing. We've had a number of 6.0 or better quakes over the last 20 years in the NW. There have been a could 8.0 or higher around here the last 200 years. So, I'll worry about the space rock that we won't see, until it punches a hole in our atmosphere the size of Australia.
Here's a scary video of liquifaction occuring in Japan. The sidewalk moving separately from the paver stone area is just plain creepy. So is the noise it makes, like a slithering animal. Then the water starts oozing up through the paver stones.Duper wrote:Some of the flood plain on that map is also due to the Bonneville dam breaking a 1000 years ago or so.
Yeah, Corvalis is a pretty solid area. Great map!
Yeah, but I get seasick real easy. People below might have to dodge my liquid bombs I hurl out the windows. You know, those people who invariably run out into the street during a quake and get hit with falling debris?Top Gun wrote:It may look scary, but that's exactly what those buildings were designed to safely do. Japan generally has its stuff together when it comes to modern earthquake-proof (or as "proof" as one can reasonably get) construction techniques. And no large skyscraper could ever be built entirely on fill: you're always going to need to have supports sunk into the bedrock.
Really, if you're ever caught in an earthquake, the best places to be would be a wood-frame house or a modern steel-frame construction. But anything with masonry...get the hell out, and fast.
It's more like to gtavity. Sun's alsoresponsible for tides, but because 'o distance, smaller than moon. Like Jupiter affects to Io.Duper wrote:how the sun influences/causes large earthquakes.
We moved out of Sunnyvale a month and half before it hit. Part of me would've liked to have experienced it, the other part of me says, thank God I missed it. One of the condo units in my complex actually had an entire end unit separate from the main building. Those many 5.0's and 4.0's that hit in the couple of years before the 7.0 were exiting enough. The precursor quakes got so frequent that I even hung up a pendulum in a third floor room and had the point of it sitting slightly in a dish of smooth sand. I could then quickly tell which fault let go during any particular quake (either the Calaveras, Hayward or San Andreas faults) by the direction of marks in the sand relative to the compass.Vander wrote:I was living in Mountain View during the Loma Prieta quake. (30mi or so) That was some serious sh!t. I vividly remember watching the World Series pre-game when the signal cut out. A couple seconds later all hell broke loose. Now, 25 years later, whenever I'm watching TV and the signal cuts out, the first thing that comes to mind is an earthquake hitting.
Actually, no Descer, I'm talking about forces a lot more prevalent and observable than gravity. Venus, is undergoing some crazy weather changes right now as are a number of planets in our system. It really has nothing to do with gravity. More like the sun's magnetosphere reducing in strength which happens in cycles of about 200 years (iirc)Descer wrote:It's more like to gtavity. Sun's alsoresponsible for tides, but because 'o distance, smaller than moon. Like Jupiter affects to Io.Duper wrote:how the sun influences/causes large earthquakes.
Why there haven't been any sights from Venus, may 'cause the observers's weren'tt here in right moment.
We had a very large meteorite that was found in the Willamette Valley in the early 1900's in West Linn, but since there was no impact crater, they think it was rafted down in ice from Canada and plopped down into the Willamette Valley during the Missoula Floods, so I can't say it actually hit here. It's pretty cool looking for an iron meteorite.Duper wrote:Seriously Sigma...what's up with that???? You guys are hogging all the space rocks!! no fair!
Ya know, after having lived in Colorado for 4 years and having to endure the large hail, tornadoes, flash floods and lightning, I'll take earthquakes any day too. I'm sure Foil would disagree, but I really hated those violent thunderstorms along the Front Range and the quakes in California didn't bother me nearly as much.Duper wrote:I for one, TC, am not worried about Yellowstone. Given that it's constantly letting off gases and the like, very little pressure is building. Also, given its size, I doubt the whole thing would go at once. If it does, I'll be a bit happier that I live on the west coast.
Too many things this earth can do that we can't control. If you escape earthquakes, you throw yourself into an area that gets hammered with storms and I'll take my chances with earthquakes over tornadoes any day!
http://www.livescience.com/200-super-vo ... -warn.html"Explosions of this magnitude "happen about every 600,000 years at Yellowstone," says Chuck Wicks of the U.S. Geological Survey, who has studied the possibilities in separate work. "And it's been about 620,000 years since the last super explosive eruption there."
They think it came down in the thick ice fields of Canada during the last ice age and was transported down to Oregon encased in an ice chunk during the great Missoula Floods. That's why there is no visible crater in Oregon. It didn't hit here.sigma wrote:WOW! This meteorite should leave a good meteor crater. Interestingly, how scientists have determined that the age of this meteorite roughly a billion years.