Religious nut?

Nightshade · Post by **Nightshade** » Fri Sep 25, 2015 10:15 pm

...or just plain nut?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ldren.html

It's scary how this weirdo is in a position of power.

Flabby Chick · Post by **Flabby Chick** » Fri Sep 25, 2015 11:52 pm

It is scarier to see publications like The Daily Mail being used to form opinions and debate on anything apart from Kim Kardashian's latest adventures.

Nightshade · Post by **Nightshade** » Fri Sep 25, 2015 11:59 pm

Flabby Chick wrote:It is scarier to see publications like The Daily Mail being used to form opinions and debate on anything apart from Kim Kardashian's latest adventures.

Where the information appears doesn't change the fact that this politician is a loon.

callmeslick · Post by **callmeslick** » Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:52 am

I found it a bit odd, but my wife, who is Catholic, found it to be alright. Not really high on my nut scale, but what Brady did WAS unsanitary.

callmeslick · Post by **callmeslick** » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:15 am

let's have some perspective, here. Ben Carson feels that the theory of evolution was the product of the Devil, Rep.Brady cops the Pope's water glass. One is running for President.

And, TB and Woody think the Muslims are the religious problem here.

woodchip · Post by **woodchip** » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:30 am

Flabby Chick wrote:It is scarier to see publications like The Daily Mail being used to form opinions and debate on anything apart from Kim Kardashian's latest adventures.

Sadly that is where the uniformed voter goes to get get his political information. Read for 30 seconds then look at the sidebar for 30 minutes. Even scarier is when slick posts a source from a George Soros medium like MSNBC or NPR that he contributes millions to.

callmeslick · Post by **callmeslick** » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:42 am

that is sort of my view of TBs link elsewhere. If the sidebar has 4 stories about Sharia coming to the US, my ability to find that site credible drops.

Spidey · Post by **Spidey** » Sat Sep 26, 2015 7:56 am

Flabby Chick wrote:It is scarier to see publications like The Daily Mail being used to form opinions and debate on anything apart from Kim Kardashian's latest adventures.

I do my best not to let “news” outlets form my opinions.

Same goes for so called studies and surveys.

Flabby Chick · Post by **Flabby Chick** » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:19 am

Yup, i'm right with you on that, Spidey.

Vander · Post by **Vander** » Sat Sep 26, 2015 1:07 pm

The correct answer is "plain nut."

Tunnelcat · Post by **Tunnelcat** » Sat Sep 26, 2015 3:17 pm

woodchip wrote:
Flabby Chick wrote:It is scarier to see publications like The Daily Mail being used to form opinions and debate on anything apart from Kim Kardashian's latest adventures.
Sadly that is where the uniformed voter goes to get get his political information. Read for 30 seconds then look at the sidebar for 30 minutes. Even scarier is when slick posts a source from a George Soros medium like MSNBC or NPR that he contributes millions to.

Says the guy who thinks Donald Trump is actually presidential material. A man who's just a sensationalist TV personality and a real estate tycoon, never reveals any actual coherent plans to get things done as president, is thin-skinned, insults everyone he dislikes and is quick tempered, and rarely exudes actual leadership qualities whenever he speaks.

woodchip · Post by **woodchip** » Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:22 pm

Didn't I say similar things about Obama back in 2007/2008?

callmeslick · Post by **callmeslick** » Sun Sep 27, 2015 6:08 am

woodchip wrote:Didn't I say similar things about Obama back in 2007/2008?

and you were clearly wrong, then.....funny how you worship the same qualities now. No doubt, Obama has convinced you by his brilliance at the job.

Religious nut?

Religious nut?

Re: Religious nut?

Re: Religious nut?

Re: Religious nut?

Re: Religious nut?

Re: Religious nut?

Re: Religious nut?

Re: Religious nut?

Re: Religious nut?

Re: Religious nut?

Re: Religious nut?

Re: Religious nut?

Re: Religious nut?