the Palin endorsement

[callmeslick]

http://www.redstate.com/2016/01/19/sara ... lin-today/

seriously, though, this might be great news for Trump, disasterous news for the GOP as a whole. Essentially, she just put another nail in the coffin. Now the Dems can link her and Trump and run against sheer public idiocy. They(the Dems) have a shot at running the table, now.

[callmeslick]

yup, it's all about family values: drunken brawls, out-of-wedlock(serial violation) babies, cheating on your last Euro model wife with the next one, and now, this:
http://gawker.com/track-palin-was-charg ... 1753857153

please, let Trump/Palin be the ticket!!!!! I've lived my whole life without a 50-0 electoral college vote.

[vision]

Meh, I'm not one to dismiss a person because of their family. You can do everything right as a parent and still have screwed up kids. I would rather dismiss her on wacky ideas.

[callmeslick]

Meh, I'm not one to dismiss a person because of their family. You can do everything right as a parent and still have screwed up kids. I would rather dismiss her on wacky ideas.

oh, I'd pretty much agree were the persons 'wacky ideas' not including pontification on 'family values'.

[Tunnelcat]

Wow, here comes the circus, with an egotistical ringleader and a clown!

[Top Gun]

I can't stand her for no other reason than the godawful names she inflicted on her children. "Track"? The hell?

[Tunnelcat]

The fact she can't speak a coherent sentence, or read, doesn't help her case either. She only blows political dogwhistles like "patriot", "liberty", "take back America" or "make America great again" and her dog followers slaver over it like red meat. No substance and an empty head. That's all she really is.

[callmeslick]

I'd love to know what the quid pro quo for that endorsement was. There always is one.

[Lothar]

"Sarah Palin's speech endorsing Donald J. Trump made no sense, because making sense isn’t really Palin’s style. But it’s also because there is no coherent defense of Donald Trump’s candidacy."

https://reason.com/blog/2016/01/20/sara ... speech-was

[woodchip]

Yet Trump leads the gop by a wide margin. I think the only good Palin brings will be the conservative factor. I for one don't think Trump needs her.

[Lothar]

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... inevitable

[callmeslick]

nice article. The sad, but predictable end of the Tea Party movement.

[Tunnelcat]

It gets even better. I heard that since Palin dissed Ted Cruz, he's going to bring in Glenn Beck to endorse him. Now we have a circus and a carnival show.

[callmeslick]

but, wait, there's more!!!! Palin pulled a no-show on two events so far today for Trump. Probably drunk(or should I say, 'still drunk' given yesterdays rambling, out of focus gibberish). She did, apparently, find time to infer that her son's abusiveness and drunkeness is due to PTSD from living in Obama's America.

[woodchip]

but, wait, there's more!!!! Palin pulled a no-show on two events so far today for Trump. Probably drunk(or should I say, 'still drunk' given yesterdays rambling, out of focus gibberish). She did, apparently, find time to infer that her son's abusiveness and drunkeness is due to PTSD from living in Obama's America.

Well I always figured you really looked down on the American serviceman and now it shows. If you got the ear wax out and listened, she said the PTSD was from his tour of duty back in 2008. Nice illustration on playing politics with members of the military who saw combat while you sit around play acting by thanking people for their service.

[Ferno]

Well I always figured you really looked down on the American serviceman and now it shows. If you got the ear wax out and listened, she said the PTSD was from his tour of duty back in 2008. Nice illustration on playing politics with members of the military who saw combat while you sit around play acting by thanking people for their service.

hilarious, and oh so ironic.

[woodchip]

And just what, exactly do you find humorous? Or just making a non-nonsensical reply makes you seem more intellectual?

[callmeslick]

but, wait, there's more!!!! Palin pulled a no-show on two events so far today for Trump. Probably drunk(or should I say, 'still drunk' given yesterdays rambling, out of focus gibberish). She did, apparently, find time to infer that her son's abusiveness and drunkeness is due to PTSD from living in Obama's America.

Well I always figured you really looked down on the American serviceman and now it shows. If you got the ear wax out and listened, she said the PTSD was from his tour of duty back in 2008. Nice illustration on playing politics with members of the military who saw combat while you sit around play acting by thanking people for their service.

and then, she ranted on about Obama not caring for the troops. But, thanks for projecting your hate onto me. I'm the one who actually WORKS with wounded vets.

[Ferno]

And just what, exactly do you find humorous? Or just making a non-nonsensical reply makes you seem more intellectual?

Oh, just the fact you were bagging on servicemen in the recent past is all.

With your supposed 'service', which I now highly doubt, I also find it to be ironic.

[woodchip]

Bagging? And who cares what you doubt.

[Tunnelcat]

What gets me is that Trump actually stepped aside from his power podium to let a shrill, rambling idiot spout bunch of nonsense. Some of the news reporters went into Trump's crowd and asked if any of them liked Palin. Quite a few of them actually said flat out: "no".

Another view.

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/po ... dorsement/

[callmeslick]

Bagging? And who cares what you doubt.

just remember this quote the next time you make some goofy assertion about me. I will, trust me.

[woodchip]

Why would you care what I or anyone else doubts about you?

[callmeslick]

Why would you care what I or anyone else doubts about you?

I don't. Just thought it worth reminding you of the fact. Sometimes you seem to be under the illusion it matters, to the point of expressing your doubts strongly. I frankly couldn't care less.

[woodchip]

You must care or you wouldn't be referencing it now. Strike a nerve?

[callmeslick]

You must care or you wouldn't be referencing it now. Strike a nerve?

unless there is some irony nerve, no it didn't.

[Lothar]

So is there a topic here, or just a personal feud?

[woodchip]

It's the usual degradation of a topic by the insertion of personal feelings. Might as well close it.

[Foil]

As you wish.