Viewing bull★■◆● as profound...

[Ferno]

is associated with people who favour Trump et al.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/articl ... ne.0153419

[Nightshade]

is associated with people who favour Trump et al.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/articl ... ne.0153419

I guess you viewed that bull***t as profound.

[Ferno]

In this contribution, bull★■◆● is used as a technical term which is defined as communicative expression that lacks content, logic, or truth from the perspective of natural science.

As seen in this thread, the response by thunderbunny reinforces the linked study.

[Spidey]

Wow, 196 people…

Talk about profound bull★■◆●.

I continued to read, but when my boots were submerged, I had to stop.

[Ferno]

oh, so what you're saying is, you think the sample size is too small, and you didn't read the whole thing?

[vision]

Ah yes, I've seen this kind of study done before. It's becoming quite popular, probably because it's funny, easy to reproduce, and produces reliable results. I'm sure well have a meta-study on these in no time.