No charges

[callmeslick]

actually, on the security thing, as I understand it, State can still pull clearances for those deemed violating policies. This will put the kibosh on, say aides to Ms.Clinton who might have hoped for high level jobs in the new administration.

[vision]

And the GOP continue to eat their own. Madness.

[woodchip]

You call Comey statements of Hillary an exoneration? Wow

yes, that was precisely what came across, due to the lines of questioning put forth by the GOP members. They set themselves up.

I suggest you re-read Comey's testimony and show me where he did anything to exonerate Hillary.

[callmeslick]

anyone who watched it saw it, Woody. Too bad you couldn't grasp it.

[Tunnelcat]

I agree with woody. Although Comey didn't recommend charges against Hillary, he pretty much reamed her a new one concerning her handling of classified government documents. She was sloppy with national secrets, even if she had no "intent" to be sloppy with those secrets, at least that anyone can legally prove.

[sigma]

In my opinion there is no need to have access to so-called "secret correspondence" Hillary Clinton, to know WHO SHE IS. I'm sure at 99% she is going to lie even in her memoirs.

[Tunnelcat]

Oh, she's a liar and she's quite comfortable lying to get what she wants. That's the problem with liars, once they get comfortable doing it, they'll never change. Same thing with Trump and most politicians.

[sigma]

On retirement, retire, it's time to retire. As say Russians in such cases (however, not without its share of sarcasm), - "Young everywhere we road, old men everywhere we honor"

[Tunnelcat]

sigma, лжец, not, выходить на пенсию.

[woodchip]

anyone who watched it saw it, Woody. Too bad you couldn't grasp it.

As TC points out, you evidently are the one who can't grasp it...but then being a Dem rah rah boy it is to be expected.