Sleezebag

[woodchip]

So, even after being warned by Powell 3 times, Hillary Clinton thinks she can throw him under the bus and scapegoat him for her server. Backfiring now on her. Even more interesting is a hacked email from Powell to Dem Donor:

In one blunt 2014 email with Democratic donor Jeffrey Leeds, Powell had this to say of Clinton:

"I would rather not have to vote for her, although she is a friend I respect. A 70-year person with a long track record, unbridled ambition, greedy,not [sic] transformational, with a husband still d**king bimbos at home (according to the NYP)."

Tell me, what wife in her right mind puts up with a husband who still cheats on her after all these years (though I got to hand it to Bill that he is still able to dick all these women) Tell me TC, would you put up with a husband like that? And what does it say about her moral character?

[Vander]

Hmm. Tell me more. What else did Powell say in his emails?

[Tunnelcat]

Ouch! That isn't going to help Hillary one bit. Powell's emails make references to Hillary's hatred of Obama and her not looking well and working too hard. Me thinks the Russians really want Trump to win with all this hacking and leaking.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/op-ed-ouch-p ... 23886.html

EDIT: Oh, and Powell doesn't like Trump either. No surprise here.

[callmeslick]

by comparison, his words towards Trump are FAR worse. However, I have gotten(like about 4 years back) really leery of document dumps. Too many proven forgeries, obvious edits of originals, duplicate versions slightly changed for my taste. As Powell noted(not confirming nor denying), if they are legit, they are a violation of his privacy........and, further proof that Hillary's folks ran a pretty secure server out there on Long Island.

[woodchip]

And right on que slick attacks the messenger.

[callmeslick]

And right on que slick attacks the messenger.

seriously, you will then accept that Colin Powell called your chosen Orange Buffoon an 'embarassment to the nation', 'a threat to our freedoms', 'a disgrace', and on and on?? I was trying to toss you a lifejacket here, with my view that any such purloined email docs are suspect and ought to be viewed with extreme caution until proven legitimate. Feel free to resume flailing and floundering.