Nice quote

Top Wop · Post by **Top Wop** » Fri Jun 18, 2004 8:31 pm

Krom wrote:How far are you willing to go to guarantee your survival?

Probably by invading Poland.

*Rimshot*

Pebkac · Post by **Pebkac** » Fri Jun 18, 2004 10:40 pm

Thanks for the kind words.

Spot-on accurate and truly from the heart. You're quite welcome.

Thanks again. Now read the whole article, not just the headline. Did I hear somebody say "dumbarse" just a minute ago?

You're welcome again. I did read the whole article. I read the same article from 5 different sources. That brainfart you called a fact left you no wiggle-room, so in each of the articles your assertion is refuted by the end of the first paragraph.

Remnants. How old? How many? What was found was years old scrap material, Mr. "D".

sigh...

Go to page four of this very thread, and it will tell you "what was found." It's amazing how you keep painting yourself into a corner.

1) Iraq did not actively support Al Qaida (-> training camps)
2) Iraq sought a "cease fire" so that Al Qaida would stop anti-Saddam Hussein activities in Iraq (to me pretty understandable and no argument at all Iraq would support Al Quaida)
3) The report states (not quoted here) that there was no involvement of Iraq in the 9/11/01 attack on the U.S. of A.
1)There are statements from Mr. Bush claiming this. Everybody knows this. There are some quotations of his speeches here, and you can google for themself. I will not give a link - think that proves me wrong, big "D"?
2) The Bush administration tried to construct Iraq supporting Al Qaida from this. In fact, Iraq just tried to get them off their butt.
3) See 1).

1) Really? Everybody "knows" this? Do they "know" things like you "know" things? I'm sorry, but you are going to have to post a link. I'm not going to dig around to gather your support for you.
2) Really? Is this another "fact" that you "know?" Back it up.
3) You're either ignorant or a liar. I'm betting on both. Good luck trying to support this one.

You have little grounds for calling them "unsubstantiated" ... big "D".

My only grounds are that you have yet to even attempt to substantiate the vast majority of your lame-brained, woefully misinformed statements. One BS comment doesn't back up your previous BS comments.

So what? Did condemning it help me, "D"?

No, but upon further review, you don't deserve any mercy from anyone on this thread. Ignorance is forgivable. Willfull ignorance is not. Combine it with insulting, and you get, well, you. The double-whammy.

Whatever. Or is this so bad you would get banned from this forum for it?

It means Internet Tough-Guy. I was letting the other forum participants know that they should give you a wide berth, for ITGs are not to be trifled with.

I don't think I insulted everybody here, which is probably what you want to suggest with this statement.

No, just those who have the nerve to challenge these "facts" that you just seem to "know."

Actually I think that the only persons rightfully feeling offended by me could only be bash and index.

I doubt it, they probably find you amusing like I do.

I think it's pretty clear now that of the two of you and me I am the "dumbarse".

Thanks for the nice conversation.

I couldn't agree more, and you're quite welcome.

bash · Post by **bash** » Sat Jun 19, 2004 12:26 am

Pebkac's right about not feeling offended, Diedel. I haven't seen anyone crash and burn in such a publicly humiliating way since Ace posted pics of himself with his fingers up his cat's as[spoiler][/spoiler]s.

Encore! Let me explain a little about how this thing works, dumpfbacke. Just like Descent, he who blows up loses, and you've left quite an impressive debris field across multiple pages and posts. Welcome to the DBB. The sound you hear is everyone laughing at you.

Robo · Post by **Robo** » Sat Jun 19, 2004 4:51 am

I'm not laughing...

woodchip · Post by **woodchip** » Sat Jun 19, 2004 5:10 am

deFay anyone?

Diedel · Post by **Diedel** » Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:19 am

Pebkac wrote:
Thanks again. Now read the whole article, not just the headline. Did I hear somebody say "dumbarse" just a minute ago?
You're welcome again. I did read the whole article. I read the same article from 5 different sources. That brainfart you called a fact left you no wiggle-room, so in each of the articles your assertion is refuted by the end of the first paragraph.

The article states that the "evidence" found is years old. Your investigators did not find WMD to the very day.

1) Really? Everybody "knows" this? Do they "know" things like you "know" things? I'm sorry, but you are going to have to post a link. I'm not going to dig around to gather your support for you.

There's some proof in this thread.

Actually I think that the only persons rightfully feeling offended by me could only be bash and index.
I doubt it, they probably find you amusing like I do.

Reread my statement in regard of the grammatical form used.

I think it's pretty clear now that of the two of you and me not I am the "dumbarse".

Thanks for the nice conversation.

You "forgot" something when quoting me. I helped you out (printed bold). Actually, this makes your a liar though.

Diedel · Post by **Diedel** » Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:22 am

bash wrote:Pebkac's right about not feeling offended, Diedel. I haven't seen anyone crash and burn in such a publicly humiliating way since Ace posted pics of himself with his fingers up his cat's as[spoiler][/spoiler]s. Encore! Let me explain a little about how this thing works, dumpfbacke. Just like Descent, he who blows up loses, and you've left quite an impressive debris field across multiple pages and posts. Welcome to the DBB. The sound you hear is everyone laughing at you.

It's pretty stupid "tactics" to claim "everybody does this and that" against somebody else. There's obviously people who do not want to be forced into your party. I can stand for myself. Obviously, you can't. Pretty interesting that you need to claim the support of all the people around you against me.

Usually people like you are called "geistiger Tiefflieger" here, but "geistiger Tunnelbohrer" seems even more appropriate. Why don't you try to find a cure for your intelligence allergy?

Diedel · Post by **Diedel** » Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:26 am

Krom wrote:I don't care about your moral standards, feeble ravings of one more irrelevant no-man trying to sound far more important then he really is. Given all the BS I hear going on in the rest of the world I am glad I live in America. I'm glad our armed forces are the best on the planet, I am glad our leaders have the guts to act even when everyone else says no. We are watching out for our interests, just like everyone else. There is only one moral standard that really counts: Survival. Whoever is left standing at the end of the day are the ones with the superior moral standard. How far are you willing to go to guarantee your survival?

You have totally disqualified yourself with this total utter crap. And as if the U.S. were fighting for their survival. I haven't heard something more obviously wrong and stupid in a long time.

You have no moral or civilizatory standards at all. By your standards, if Hitler had won, he would have been right. Not so, and fortunately, your forefathers who fought him knew better than you morally retarded relict. Actually your "doctrine" would make you a very good Nazi.

fliptw · Post by **fliptw** » Sat Jun 19, 2004 9:21 am

Diedel wrote:http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0 ... 34,00.html
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0 ... 39,00.html
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0 ... 36,00.html
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0 ... 98,00.html

This is from one of the biggest and most renowned European news magazines.

Don't blame me if you cannot read German.

If you can't provide backup to your points in something the other side can understand, then why bother?

DCrazy · Post by **DCrazy** » Sat Jun 19, 2004 10:53 am

Deidel wrote:You have no moral or civilizatory standards at all.

Ahh, I see you're definitely in tune with America. We evil barbarians without a shred of decency. You know, the ones who brouht you the very internet you could be using to actually understand American culture instead of reading anti-U.S. garbage designed to make you feel morally superior.

We have no morals or sense of civilization? Well, you have no clue.

Krom · Post by **Krom** » Sat Jun 19, 2004 12:13 pm

Diedel wrote:You have totally disqualified yourself with this total utter crap. And as if the U.S. were fighting for their survival. I haven't heard something more obviously wrong and stupid in a long time.

You have no moral or civilizatory standards at all. By your standards, if Hitler had won, he would have been right. Not so, and fortunately, your forefathers who fought him knew better than you morally retarded relict. Actually your "doctrine" would make you a very good Nazi.

Hitler didnâ??t win WW2.

The USA isnâ??t just fighting for our survival; they are fighting for yours as well. Why don't you try and show a little more respect. And yes, it is really a fight for survival, look at what the extremists and the terrorists really want: Total destruction and elimination of the western civilization.

Pebkac · Post by **Pebkac** » Sat Jun 19, 2004 2:28 pm

The article states that the "evidence" found is years old. Your investigators did not find WMD to the very day.

Years old? So what? That wasn't your contention. If it was, then you did your usual piss-poor job of expressing your point. Your contention was, "... after the 2nd Gulf War, none were found by your own people. That's a fact." You see? You posted it on page 5. It's clear that you've posted so much unsubstantiated crap on here that you can't even keep up with yourself anymore. How amuzing.

There's some proof in this thread.

There is? Well, you'd better go back a few pages and do a copy/paste then. I'm saying there is no proof of ANYTHING you've posted in this thread. No proof at all. Just more brainfarts from your feeble mind.

Reread my statement in regard of the grammatical form used.

I did. Sounds just as idiotic as it did the first couple of times.

You "forgot" something when quoting me. I helped you out (printed bold). Actually, this makes your a liar though.

I apologize, I was trying to do you a favor. You posted yet another easily refutable statement. It only required the removal of that one word to make it accurate. I was trying to help you foster the belief among the other forum participants that you weren't a complete ass-hat. However, you seem determined to look like a fool, so I won't try to stop you anymore.

Anyway, what else you got? I'll admit that this is getting boring, as you aren't even a challenge anymore. Surely you can now see why it is that you are so easy to discredit. You take care of 90% of the job all on your own. I do welcome you to keep posting though, because seeing your weak "arguments" repeatedly destroyed is hilarious. Only slightly more hilarious is watching you squirm each time you're proven to be incorrect.

I really do hope that you're not representative of the youth of Europe. If so, one must weep for its ignorant, uneducated, and mentally-challenged future.

EDIT:

"I can stand for myself." -- Diedel

BWWAAAAHAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAAHAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAA

Dude, you're amazing!!!

as if the U.S. were fighting for their survival. I haven't heard something more obviously wrong and stupid in a long time.

LOL! Do a forum search for all the posts of Diedel in the E&C forum. Krom's statement doesn't hold a candle to Diedel's verbal defications.

Robo · Post by **Robo** » Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:29 pm

I said this before... poke any americans in this forum and get stood on - I warned all of you. It's gone on enough now, you've bashed him enough. The guy isn't a nazi and you've displayed your patriotism enough. Close the thread.

It's annoying me. A lot. And that takes some doing

Ugh.

Lothar · Post by **Lothar** » Sat Jun 19, 2004 8:34 pm

Pierre, I'll PM you with a response, or post it in a new thread.