Liberal warmongers...

[Nightshade]

...quite literally.



Trump has driven the left completely batshit crazy.

[Top Gun]

So one guy getting 20 retweets represents "the left." Do you seriously have nothing better to do with your time?

[callmeslick]

[Nightshade]

Bill Clinton was a democrat.

[callmeslick]

reality a bit off, huh?

[woodchip]

There were no briefings about this as Ms Gorelick had put up a wall so intellegence agencies could not share info. Seems the Dems still have a wall up as slick still does not have a clue.

[Tunnelcat]

Uh, huh. Keep trying to rewrite history all you want woody, but no matter how you spin it, 9/11 happened on a Republican president's watch. Bush and company ignored far too many warnings once they got into office, like Al Qaeda's activities and training at flight schools, while focusing on the wrong things, like Iraq, Saddam and missile defense priorities. Yes, Bill Clinton had his idiot missteps dealing with Al Qaeda, but nothing as massive as the 9/11 attack on American soil under Bush.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91651&page=1

[Top Gun]

Seriously though, I want to hear this from TB: if it is indeed a verifiable fact that Russia was ★■◆●ing around with our electoral process with the end goal of getting a particular candidate elected, what do you deem a proper response? A verbal scolding? Just bending over and taking it? I'm genuinely curious.

[Grendel]

Beefing up cyber-security.

[Top Gun]

...so that's an "our bad Russia, you do you!" then?

[Spidey]

I'm afraid there isn't much we can do.

[Nightshade]

Seriously though, I want to hear this from TB: if it is indeed a verifiable fact that Russia was ★■◆●ing around with our electoral process with the end goal of getting a particular candidate elected, what do you deem a proper response? A verbal scolding? Just bending over and taking it? I'm genuinely curious.

Exclusive: Top U.S. spy agency has not embraced CIA assessment on Russia hacking - sources

The overseers of the U.S. intelligence community have not embraced a CIA assessment that Russian cyber attacks were aimed at helping Republican President-elect Donald Trump win the 2016 election, three American officials said on Monday.

While the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) does not dispute the CIA's analysis of Russian hacking operations, it has not endorsed their assessment because of a lack of conclusive evidence that Moscow intended to boost Trump over Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton, said the officials, who declined to be named.

The position of the ODNI, which oversees the 17 agency-strong U.S. intelligence community, could give Trump fresh ammunition to dispute the CIA assessment, which he rejected as "ridiculous" in weekend remarks, and press his assertion that no evidence implicates Russia in the cyber attacks.

Trump's rejection of the CIA's judgment marks the latest in a string of disputes over Russia's international conduct that have erupted between the president-elect and the intelligence community he will soon command.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-t ... SKBN14204E

[callmeslick]

so, you're ok with Russia involving itself in our system, even if it didn't specifically, provably, INTEND to get Trump elected? Wow, the patriotism you display is awe-inspiring.

[woodchip]

Oh come on slick. If the supposed hacking benefited the Dems, you'd be doing the same as TB.

[callmeslick]

Oh come on slick. If the supposed hacking benefited the Dems, you'd be doing the same as TB.

the ★■◆● I would. Some things go WAY past party, or even platform.

[Vander]

If the charges are true, and I don't think any of us can say for certain they are or not, I think it's kind of fitting that we would be on the receiving end of the crap we normally do to other countries. Though I doubt this will be a "teachable moment" in this regard. It also illuminates where "sovereignty" really ranks for a lot of people.

[callmeslick]

fair points all, Vander.

[woodchip]

Oh come on slick. If the supposed hacking benefited the Dems, you'd be doing the same as TB.

the ★■◆● I would. Some things go WAY past party, or even platform.

The defensive BS meter is high in this one.

[callmeslick]

no, you just are making things up about others, and lying based on that. Business as usual. I am quite aware of how I'd react.

[woodchip]

Nah slick, we all have seen how you post here.

[callmeslick]

Nah slick, we all have seen how you post here.

and, you can cite NOTHING that would indicate that I would be OK with a foreign power interfering with domestic affairs. Hell, I don't like the influence Israel has, and have written so.

Nice to see that you have inspiration for lying, daily:
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ ... li=BBnb7Kz
the BSer in Chief, at work!

[callmeslick]

fairly good read:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/15/opini ... p=cur&_r=0

"no more 'useful idiot'......."

[Top Gun]

So how's it feel having voted for a candidate who was bought and paid for by Putin, woody? You have that old Looney Tunes "sucker" look going on yet?

[callmeslick]

no, he thinks he's a 'patriot'.

[Top Gun]

What I find most droll here is that woody is the one who has usually spoken out most vehemently (and usually rightly so) against Putin to sigma. And now...silence.

[woodchip]

So how's it feel having voted for a candidate who was bought and paid for by Putin, woody? You have that old Looney Tunes "sucker" look going on yet?

As Putin is now saying,"Put up or shut up"

[callmeslick]

So how's it feel having voted for a candidate who was bought and paid for by Putin, woody? You have that old Looney Tunes "sucker" look going on yet?

As Putin is now saying,"Put up or shut up"

good comrade!! Can we count on you being his regular spokesperson here? The translation will be so much easier than for Sigma