So when Mueller gave testimony he uttered one line that should chill you to the bones. Not that Trump was guilty of any crime. Quite the contrary. He said, "As such, the investigation "does not conclude that the President committed a crime"; however, "it also does not exonerate him",[25][26]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_Report
So last I checked, all citizens, even Trump, are naturally presumed innocent. So is this how the legal system will work when the Dems get power?
Trying to subvert our jurisprudence
Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250
Trying to subvert our jurisprudence
Liberal speak: "Convenience for you means control for him, free and the price is astronomical, you're the product for sale". Neil Oliver
Leftist are Evil, and Liberals keep voting for them. Dennis Prager
A mouse might be in a cookie jar.... but he is not a cookie" ... Casper Ten Boom
If your life revolves around the ability to have an abortion, what does that say about your life? Anonymous
Leftist are Evil, and Liberals keep voting for them. Dennis Prager
A mouse might be in a cookie jar.... but he is not a cookie" ... Casper Ten Boom
If your life revolves around the ability to have an abortion, what does that say about your life? Anonymous
Re: Trying to subvert our jurisprudence
The Republicans have already shown that we may as well not have a legal system when they have power. Do you have a problem with that?
Also what Muller said is completely factually correct. He did not draw any conclusions about whether Trump's actions rose to criminal levels, because he viewed that as outside the purview of the investigation. Tell me how this threatens due process again?
Also what Muller said is completely factually correct. He did not draw any conclusions about whether Trump's actions rose to criminal levels, because he viewed that as outside the purview of the investigation. Tell me how this threatens due process again?
Re: Trying to subvert our jurisprudence
DING DING DING! Correct. This was an investigation to uncover evidence which must happen whether a person is guilty or innocent. That's what an investigation is. To discover wrongdoing. Did you not know this?
- Tunnelcat
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 13691
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:32 pm
- Location: Pacific Northwest, U.S.A.
Re: Trying to subvert our jurisprudence
Uh news flash. Trump wasn't exonerated. He wasn't indicted because of the standing DOJ rule that a sitting president cannot be indicted. If he were a private citizen, he'd be prosecuted in a heartbeat.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/ ... 144041001/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/ ... 144041001/
Cat (n.) A bipolar creature which would as soon gouge your eyes out as it would cuddle.
Re: Trying to subvert our jurisprudence
Why would you think the President is treated the same as all citizens? He's obviously not. The Mueller Report quite plainly states how and why the President very specifically is being treated differently from all other citizens.woodchip wrote:So last I checked, all citizens, even Trump, are naturally presumed innocent.
Presuming innocence can only exist in a legal realm where guilt can be charged.
- Tunnelcat
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 13691
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:32 pm
- Location: Pacific Northwest, U.S.A.
Re: Trying to subvert our jurisprudence
Yeah, the only reason he NOT being indicted and thrown in prison is BECAUSE he's the damn president. The DOJ is protecting his ass.
Cat (n.) A bipolar creature which would as soon gouge your eyes out as it would cuddle.