Which Satan?

Avder · Post by **Avder** » Mon Jun 28, 2004 11:27 am

Indeed.

Krom · Post by **Krom** » Mon Jun 28, 2004 11:45 am

Birdseye · Post by **Birdseye** » Mon Jun 28, 2004 6:25 pm

This cartoon is silly and distorts both sides.

DCrazy · Post by **DCrazy** » Mon Jun 28, 2004 6:28 pm

Heh... just saw how you edited that to actually make it on topic!

Was:
"lame... many more iraqis have died than americans"

Now:
"many more iraqis have died than americans...put that in the 'dog' panel."

Missing from both:
The fact that Americans didn't target innocent civilians and then broadcast gloating footage of their vicious execution, and that the mainstream Iraqis are not the ones performing or supporting the actions of the militants.

[edit]OMG, an editing spree! Now it's: "This cartoon is silly and distorts both sides."

IT'S A FRICKEN POLITICAL CARTOON! THAT IS THE ENTIRE POINT![/edit]

Topher · Post by **Topher** » Mon Jun 28, 2004 6:28 pm

Birdseye wrote:This cartoon is silly and distorts both sides.

And yet its truth shines through bright and clear.

Will Robinson · Post by **Will Robinson** » Mon Jun 28, 2004 6:42 pm

Topher wrote:And yet its truth shines through bright and clear.

Exactly

Birdseye · Post by **Birdseye** » Mon Jun 28, 2004 6:54 pm

ok, i'm retarded you win.

Shame on me for deciding to change my words after thinking about it more.

DCrazy · Post by **DCrazy** » Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:00 pm

Don't think of it like that, think of it as being quicker on the draw.

My main problem is that each point you made was irrelevant. Political cartoons are not meant to be CNN in Four Panels.

Lothar · Post by **Lothar** » Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:22 pm

How's this, then?

Congratulations for retracting the extremely lame sniping, and shame on you for replacing it with moderately lame sniping.

Birdseye · Post by **Birdseye** » Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:40 pm

Thanks!

Sarge · Post by **Sarge** » Mon Jun 28, 2004 8:06 pm

It's OK Birds, I've done it many times here and I know others (coughBashcough) have done the same thing.

It does distort both sides, but the deeper meaning of it really hits home.

Yea... I'm voting for Nader again.

Krom · Post by **Krom** » Mon Jun 28, 2004 8:14 pm

Birdseye wrote:ok, i'm retarded you win.

Shame on me for deciding to change my words after thinking about it more.

This was your perfect chance to use the "Arguing on the internet is like running in the special Olympics, even if you win you are still retarded" picture.

index_html · Post by **index_html** » Mon Jun 28, 2004 8:22 pm

It does distort both sides, but the deeper meaning of it really hits home.

Yea... I'm voting for Nader again.

Good cartoon, but what a strange segue.

index_html · Post by **index_html** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 12:38 am

I thought this one was pretty good, too:

http://homepage.mac.com/cfj/.Pictures/A ... fort-X.gif

Ferno · Post by **Ferno** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 1:00 am

your moral superiority is showing Lothar.

DCrazy · Post by **DCrazy** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 7:22 am

heh@index

Birdseye · Post by **Birdseye** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 1:26 pm

Hey sarge, good to see you here.

Sarge · Post by **Sarge** » Tue Jun 29, 2004 2:24 pm

... and you too, Brian!