who's the Party of the rich???
Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
who's the Party of the rich???
I saw a interesting stat today that started me wondering. I always hear how the Republican party is the party of the rich and how the Democrats are for the working stiff. well I saw on the news today what the top 4 candidates are worth.
Bush is worth 15 million
Cheney is worth 50 million
Edwards is worth 70 million
Kerry is worth 1 billion
this makes me wonder understanding that these men are all millionaires how can the Democrats straight faced say that its the GOP thats for the rich??
just wonder what everyone elses take is on this
Bush is worth 15 million
Cheney is worth 50 million
Edwards is worth 70 million
Kerry is worth 1 billion
this makes me wonder understanding that these men are all millionaires how can the Democrats straight faced say that its the GOP thats for the rich??
just wonder what everyone elses take is on this
- Wolf on Air
- DBB Admiral
- Posts: 1872
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 1999 3:01 am
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
- Testiculese
- DBB Material Defender
- Posts: 4689
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2001 3:01 am
-
- DBB Admiral
- Posts: 1618
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2000 2:01 am
Kerry's wife is loaded because her family are the Heinz people...but his wife's family is Republican so Kerry essentially can't count that money. And Bush/Cheney are ridiculously wealthy. Don't give me that BS about their worth being in the millions...its in the billions. I've seen Fahrenheit 9/11...I KNOW WHAT YOU REPUBLICANS ARE UP TO!
oh jk about that part^^
oh jk about that part^^
I think somebody did and found out the Dems had Gazillion more bucks than the Reps. did.Vader wrote:I'll give you a cookie if you go to the trouble of calculating the wealth of all Seantors, Representatives, Members of the Cabinet, Justices of the Supreme Court, Governors of each State, and all of the Presidents top advisors.
That would be a facinating fact sheet.
As nearly all politicians are, don't fool yourself into thinking Kerry isn't as well.But it doesn't change the fact that he knows and is influenced by people with massive amounts of wealth.
Anyway, I agree that the argument has to do with their policies, not how much wealth they have. Their association with wealth doesn't automatically discredit them. And I'm speaking from more of a neutral viewpoint here, I'm neither republican nor democrat.
-
- DBB Admiral
- Posts: 1618
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2000 2:01 am
Conservatives have had to shoulder the negative stereotype pushed by liberals of the cigar-chomping fat cats and now it's sorta amusing to see them squirm when their own people are far fatter. But I agree, success--especially in America--shouldn't be a disqualifying factor nor an embarrassment. I find it more interesting that the presidential race is pitting two businessmen against two lawyers. Granted, they're all politicians now, but it's interesting to note how each accumulated their wealth.
That's the point I was getting at. That pointing out the differences in personal wealth is kind of silly.Fusion pimp wrote:Can you name a politician that isn't wealthy or backed by wealth? How about a politician that came from a poor family? The playing field is essentially level, Tetrad.But it doesn't change the fact that he knows and is influenced by people with massive amounts of wealth.