Just got my new Raptor drive so I decided to do a few HD tach tests on it. Get the latest version here:
http://www.simplisoftware.com/Public/in ... est=HdTach
Do a Long Bench (32meg).
Here's the Raptor, all by itself on my ICH5R southbridge:
Here's my other drive, a WD400BB, 7200rpm, 2meg cache riding on the primary IDE as master:
What do you guys get?
HD Tach Olympics
-
- DBB Supporter
- Posts: 1444
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Krom
- DBB Database Master
- Posts: 16138
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
- Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
- Contact:
500 GB RAID-0 8 MB test:
500 GB RAID-0 32 MB test:
120 GB IDE 8 MB test:
I have absolutely no explination whatsoever for the odd behavior of the 500 GB RAID, I just reformatted my system yesterday, it has done this since day one. Oddly enough it performed right where it should when it was used as single drives.
500 GB RAID-0 32 MB test:
120 GB IDE 8 MB test:
I have absolutely no explination whatsoever for the odd behavior of the 500 GB RAID, I just reformatted my system yesterday, it has done this since day one. Oddly enough it performed right where it should when it was used as single drives.
Man, those are screwy looking graphs. I had RAID0 way back in the day on a FastTrak66 card and it did something similar if I recall correctly.
Unfortuntely, the current word on the street says that RAID0 is practically useless for everyday, single user uses. Obviously this excludes video / audio editing. Both StorageReview and Anandtech recently did stories on it. Go figure, RAID0 was all the rage 1-2 years ago.
Unfortuntely, the current word on the street says that RAID0 is practically useless for everyday, single user uses. Obviously this excludes video / audio editing. Both StorageReview and Anandtech recently did stories on it. Go figure, RAID0 was all the rage 1-2 years ago.