Given that the security of the systems shown off to date has been zero (Windows and MS Access, for crying out loud!) and there being zero peer review - no, no way.
(btw, there is some slight irony in that this is an electronic vote...)
I still like the 50-year-old mechanical voting machines that my county uses . I agree that electronic voting techniques are too unreliable and risky to justify widespread use at this time. Where they are used, a paper trail should be an absolute necessity. However, in the case of Florida, the risks of electronic voting far outweigh the alternative of relying on dimpled chads .
It's easy to code, and it's not even that much harder to secure than a standard business app. The problem is that in this country it's illegal for voting to be too hard for morons to use. At least the idiocy gap filters out the worst of the bunch in computer use.
Some critics of electronic voting machines decry that there is no paper trail, so sleazeball companies like Diebold can get away with fixing elections. Suppose we had a paper trial, and everyone got a little receipt identifying who they voted for in addition to the copy given to the voting office. How has the computerized system saved any time? It hasn't. You might as well take that single paper ballot and hand it to the election official and call it a day.
Technology for the sake of technology is a hideous practice.
. I agree that electronic voting techniques are too unreliable and risky to justify widespread use at this time. Where they are used, a paper trail should be an absolute necessity. However, in the case of Florida, the risks of electronic voting far outweigh the alternative of relying on dimpled chads 
