Title says it all.
I've got a library of aproximately 17 gig's of mostly MP3's, some AAC (M4A's) from the iTunes store.
If I understand it correctly the AAC format is more readily compressed, possibly better 'sounding' but not playable by some players and not convertable into MP3 format.
Is that correct and should I just stick with MP3.
M4A...AAC file format. Should I use it or MP3?
- Will Robinson
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 10135
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am
- STRESSTEST
- DBB DemiGod
- Posts: 6574
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 1999 3:01 am
-
- Defender of the Night
- Posts: 13477
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Olathe, KS
- Contact:
I agree with Bill. However, there are ways to convert AAC songs to mp3. That is, if you don't mind spending a dollar or two at Radio Shack for a single cable to run your audio output to your line-in jack and recording the audio output in your recording program of choice. Yes, you loose audio quality that way, but its a sure-fire way of doing it. There are also programs out there that remove DRM from AAC files, but they're in a legal grey area at the moment. I believe Nero Wave Editor can do it though.
I like the OGG Vorbis format a lot as well. When I ripped my CDs, I converted all of them to OGG.
An OGG recording of the same song as an MP3 is generally larger. However, the difference is that OGG maintains a very high level of quality with a lower bitrate. So, a 192 kbps MP3 can be serviced by a 128 kbps OGG. I find OGG generally sounds "crisper" than MP3.
FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec) is also supposed to be pretty good.
An OGG recording of the same song as an MP3 is generally larger. However, the difference is that OGG maintains a very high level of quality with a lower bitrate. So, a 192 kbps MP3 can be serviced by a 128 kbps OGG. I find OGG generally sounds "crisper" than MP3.
FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec) is also supposed to be pretty good.