Ok, I need this settled ( Napoleon Dynamite )

Gooberman · Post by **Gooberman** » Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:15 pm

Please, just vote if you have seen it.

BfDiDDy · Post by **BfDiDDy** » Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:13 pm

Everyone should go see Freddy Vs Jason.

Lothar · Post by **Lothar** » Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:28 pm

It's the stupidest movie ever. But for some reason, a day later, it's hard to resist quoting it. It has just enough funny moments to be memorable.

I don't think it's worth actually sitting through and watching...

Drakona · Post by **Drakona** » Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:30 pm

I need to vote for both options in that poll.

Samuel Dravis · Post by **Samuel Dravis** » Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:32 pm

It was entertaining, but really stupid. I liked it.

Tetrad · Post by **Tetrad** » Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:03 pm

Needs more "meh" option.

MD-2389 · Post by **MD-2389** » Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:49 pm

Just the trailer alone wanted me to do this repeatedly:

Vertigo 99 · Post by **Vertigo 99** » Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:56 pm

watching the trailor and not seeing the movie does not qualify you. its one of those movies where the trailors don't show you ★■◆●.

btw, its hilarious; i laughed during the entire dancing sequence.

Gooberman · Post by **Gooberman** » Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:37 pm

No one I know in RL is meh about it. Though I could see why you would want to vote both.

I have seen my 3rd "Vote for pedro" T-shirt....

bash · Post by **bash** » Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:11 pm

I enjoyed it. It went over the top in parts but there was alot that was original. I laughed, I cried, I yearned to have little seahorses swarm my naked body.

Nitrofox125 · Post by **Nitrofox125** » Tue Feb 01, 2005 7:40 am

It's the stupidest movie ever. But for some reason, a day later, it's hard to resist quoting it. It has just enough funny moments to be memorable.

x2

Top Wop · Post by **Top Wop** » Tue Feb 01, 2005 1:24 pm

It was amusing, but it wasnt LOL funny. But I voted for the hilarious option anyway. Why? Comedy is fskn hard to write, and they have some origional material in there. And I appreciate that.

Foil · Post by **Foil** » Tue Feb 01, 2005 4:08 pm

I thought it was absolutely hilarious... but then again, I was with a group of people about my age (I'm not sure if it's quite as funny to people of older generations), and we were all in a jovial mood anyway.

Here's my question: exactly when is the movie set? All the goofy styles and clothing and even the crazy orange van suggest mid 80's, but there's also a spot with a Backstreet Boys tune (I know, I know... I'm aging myself). One of the people I watched it with thought it was set in the 90's because of the mention of the internet, but the 'net was around in the 80's, so it could be that far back... I'm not sure.

Vertigo 99 · Post by **Vertigo 99** » Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:08 pm

kip also mentions that he pays for the internet on an hourly basis.

my guess is it's mid-90's, and the style clashes are done on purpose.

Mr. Perfect · Post by **Mr. Perfect** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:11 am

MD-2389 wrote:Just the trailer alone wanted me to do this repeatedly:

What he said. Between that and a bad review, I'll never be wasting any time on it.