Wow, thank god I'm not in that age group."If you put a 20-year-old driver behind the wheel with a cellphone, his reaction times are the same as a 70-year-old driver," said David Strayer, a University of Utah psychology professor and principal author of the study. "It's like instant aging."
18-25yrs? Driving+Cell phone = old age
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9782
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
18-25yrs? Driving+Cell phone = old age
Just for Mobi
- WarAdvocat
- DBB Defender
- Posts: 3035
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2002 2:01 am
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
Tricord you may be a d*ck, but in this instance, I'm in agreement as well.
I got rear-ended (on the highway) by a guy who was on his cellphone. I was at a complete stop. He hit me so hard that my truck really smooshed the 2005 altima in front of me.
According to him, he was doing around between 40 & 50 when he hit me. Luckily I was wearing my seat belt.
I got rear-ended (on the highway) by a guy who was on his cellphone. I was at a complete stop. He hit me so hard that my truck really smooshed the 2005 altima in front of me.
According to him, he was doing around between 40 & 50 when he hit me. Luckily I was wearing my seat belt.
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9782
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
- Iceman
- DBB Habitual Type Killer
- Posts: 4929
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2000 2:01 am
- Location: Huntsville, AL. USA
- Contact:
X2CDN_Merlin wrote:STFU
I guess that means I have to tape my kids' mouths shut while we are in the car together.And it doesn't matter whether the phone is hand-held or handsfree, he said. Any activity requiring a driver to "actively be part of a conversation" likely will impair driving abilities, Strayer said.
1. STFU Mobius
2. Merlin, he does have a point. Breaking word wrap isnt very nice. I use a high resolution but I dont nessecarily always browse in full screen, and having to horizontal scroll is a PITA. You could use a different form of the url tag that would create a 1 word hyperlink Much like what you see on any othwer website.
Useage:
[ url="url" ]Clickable Text[ /url ]
Without the spaces in the tags.
2. Merlin, he does have a point. Breaking word wrap isnt very nice. I use a high resolution but I dont nessecarily always browse in full screen, and having to horizontal scroll is a PITA. You could use a different form of the url tag that would create a 1 word hyperlink Much like what you see on any othwer website.
Useage:
[ url="url" ]Clickable Text[ /url ]
Without the spaces in the tags.
Having a law that makes driving with a cellphone illegal would be nice and would make driving more enjoyable. Its been progressive but every year more and more people dont take driving seriously and the roads are more dangerous as a result of it. That and the state doesnt seem to give a damn anymore.
And I ditto Mobius.
And I ditto Mobius.
There was a local ordinance passed in a township near where I live banning them, in response to the death of a little girl who was hit by a woman who ran a stop sign while talking on the phone. I think it was removed for some technical reason or another, but I know my state legislature has at least considered it in the past.
-
- Defender of the Night
- Posts: 13477
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Olathe, KS
- Contact:
As much as I've disagreed with Tricord in the past...Lothar wrote:I wish it was that way here.Tricord wrote:It's illegal to hold a cellphone while driving over here...
x2! People around here couldn't drive their way out of a wet paper sack properly let alone drive properly while yacking their mouthes off.
dude come on. just because you're too lazy to use the url tags for your link doesn't mean you can force us to bump up our resolution. It's like posting a 1600x1200 image and yelling at us to up our resolution because you can't be bothered to resize it.CDN_Merlin wrote:Mobi, repeat after me " i will use a bigger resolution".
use some freakin courtesey next time.
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9782
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
Ferno wrote:dude come on. just because you're too lazy to use the url tags for your link doesn't mean you can force us to bump up our resolution. It's like posting a 1600x1200 image and yelling at us to up our resolution because you can't be bothered to resize it.CDN_Merlin wrote:Mobi, repeat after me " i will use a bigger resolution".
use some freakin courtesey next time.
Ferno, you're a bit late. so STFU.
-
- DBB Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 2367
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Israel
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9782
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
-
- DBB Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 2367
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Israel
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9782
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
don't ban cell phone usage in cars, that's just dumb
require that drivers must pass a test, if they pass the test then allow them to place a sticker on their plate which symbolizes that
if they cannot pass the test, then they cannot use cellphones while driving
just because some people are incapable of having a conversation while driving does not mean that everyone should be punished
require that drivers must pass a test, if they pass the test then allow them to place a sticker on their plate which symbolizes that
if they cannot pass the test, then they cannot use cellphones while driving
just because some people are incapable of having a conversation while driving does not mean that everyone should be punished
-
- Defender of the Night
- Posts: 13477
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Olathe, KS
- Contact:
Standardized testing in the US? Thats a laugh....ccb056 wrote:don't ban cell phone usage in cars, that's just dumb
require that drivers must pass a test, if they pass the test then allow them to place a sticker on their plate which symbolizes that
if they cannot pass the test, then they cannot use cellphones while driving
just because some people are incapable of having a conversation while driving does not mean that everyone should be punished
- BUBBALOU
- DBB Benefactor
- Posts: 4198
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 1999 2:01 am
- Location: Dallas Texas USA
- Contact:
In NY they have passed a law that the only cell phone usage while driving must be hands free 3 years ago.
Traffic Violations start at $150 on 1st offense (go against your license)and or including a recklous driving ticket in which they can revolk your license on the spot. they pull up next to you and take your picture on the phone... no way to dispute the charge
The price of a hands free kit is less than half the price of your first ticket AND LESS DANGEROUS
They shall be passing a federal law on this soon enough.
Traffic Violations start at $150 on 1st offense (go against your license)and or including a recklous driving ticket in which they can revolk your license on the spot. they pull up next to you and take your picture on the phone... no way to dispute the charge
The price of a hands free kit is less than half the price of your first ticket AND LESS DANGEROUS
They shall be passing a federal law on this soon enough.
- Testiculese
- DBB Material Defender
- Posts: 4689
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2001 3:01 am
-
- Defender of the Night
- Posts: 13477
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Olathe, KS
- Contact:
Dude, 90% of the drivers on the roads now can't drive for ★■◆●, and you expect them to be able to hold a conversation and drive at the same time?! What fantasy world do you live in? Hell, in Memphis if theres so much as a snowflake falling on the ground, theres an accident at atleast every other intersection. It even worse in LA. Spend a few years behind the wheel, and then see if you still hold that opinion.ccb056 wrote:I think we may have had a thread similiar to this in the past and it was testi who humoursly brought up the banning of short skirts being worn by passengers because they can cause more of a distraction to the driver than holding a conversation over the phone.
- CDN_Merlin
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 9782
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Capital Of Canada
- Lothar
- DBB Ghost Admin
- Posts: 12133
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: I'm so glad to be home
- Contact:
in Colorado, the rule was that you didn't drive during the first snowstorm of the season.
All the n00bs would go out in the first snowstorm and crash, because they don't know how to drive when there's white stuff on the ground. By the second snowstorm, they'd either learned their lesson, or crashed, so then it was safe to drive.
All the n00bs would go out in the first snowstorm and crash, because they don't know how to drive when there's white stuff on the ground. By the second snowstorm, they'd either learned their lesson, or crashed, so then it was safe to drive.