http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100924/ap_ ... tion_islam
I guess if children don't learn about that nasty Islam, then they'll turn into nice little loving Christians. Out of sight, out of mind and ignorant because they learned nothing.
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250
well you didn't learn about Islam in school and your not a \"Nice little loving Christian\" so I guess that shoots that argument in the foot doesn't it?I guess if children don't learn about that nasty Islam, then they'll turn into nice little loving Christians.
NO praying to Christ is OK but not if your a PoliticianAlphaDoG wrote:Ok so it's ok to teach Islam. Hold on my head is spinning, but yet, praying to Christ, is not ok?
Holy Smokes.
Who was talking about praying? If a history class ignores a major religion practiced by a billion people today that's had a massive influence on world events, there's sort of a problem with said class. It'd be the same if the curriculum downplayed Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, or Hinduism.AlphaDoG wrote:Ok so it's ok to teach Islam. Hold on my head is spinning, but yet, praying to Christ, is not ok?
Holy Smokes.
you are correct. How do you feel about removing the mention from the history books that the terrorists that attacked America were radical Islamists?Top Gun wrote:Who was talking about praying? If a history class ignores a major religion practiced by a billion people today that's had a massive influence on world events, there's sort of a problem with said class. It'd be the same if the curriculum downplayed Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, or Hinduism.AlphaDoG wrote:Ok so it's ok to teach Islam. Hold on my head is spinning, but yet, praying to Christ, is not ok?
Holy Smokes.
I think it's more important to mention that they were Saudi nationals, to be honest.Will Robinson wrote:you are correct. How do you feel about removing the mention from the history books that the terrorists that attacked America were radical Islamists?Top Gun wrote:Who was talking about praying? If a history class ignores a major religion practiced by a billion people today that's had a massive influence on world events, there's sort of a problem with said class. It'd be the same if the curriculum downplayed Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, or Hinduism.AlphaDoG wrote:Ok so it's ok to teach Islam. Hold on my head is spinning, but yet, praying to Christ, is not ok?
Holy Smokes.
Okay, and everyone else was Saudi.Heretic wrote:Mohamed Mohamed el-Amir Awad el-Sayed Atta Was Egyptian, Ziad Jarrah was Lebanese. Marwan al-Shehhi and Fayez Banihammad were from the United Arab Emirates.
That is such a stupid line of pure rhetoric. As was pointed out they were not all Saudi's. The democrats liked that fabricated talking point when Bush was in because he had extended his hand to the Saudi's so it made stupid or ignorant voters think the administration was chasing the wrong snake down the wrong hole.null0010 wrote:I think it's more important to mention that they were Saudi nationals, to be honest.Will Robinson wrote:you are correct. How do you feel about removing the mention from the history books that the terrorists that attacked America were radical Islamists?Top Gun wrote:Who was talking about praying? If a history class ignores a major religion practiced by a billion people today that's had a massive influence on world events, there's sort of a problem with said class. It'd be the same if the curriculum downplayed Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, or Hinduism.AlphaDoG wrote:Ok so it's ok to teach Islam. Hold on my head is spinning, but yet, praying to Christ, is not ok?
Holy Smokes.