Page 5 of 8
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 10:25 pm
by MD-2389
bash wrote:Main Entry: de·pict
1. To represent in a picture or sculpture.
2. To represent in words; describe.
I guess you could stretch it to say a dildo *depicts* a male sexual organ but there is nothing inherently pornographic about either the male sexual organ or depictions of it.
Digressing further...
Bash, put your dictionary down and THINK for a change. Its not the LOOK of a sex toy that makes it pornographic, but its USE. The sole use of a dildo is to get someone off. Nothing more, nothing less.
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 10:26 pm
by bash
Are you claiming *getting someone off* is pornographic?
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 10:27 pm
by Ferno
you ever hear of an electric egg Bash?
Bash wrote:Are you claiming *getting someone off* is pornographic?
if viewed by the public, yes.
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 10:29 pm
by MD-2389
bash wrote:Are you claiming *getting someone off* is pornographic?
Bash, do you even
know what masturbation is?! You're really grasping at straws aren't you....
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 10:30 pm
by bash
Are you claiming that masturbation is pornographic?
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 10:31 pm
by Ferno
someone call a tech.. the record is broken.
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 10:32 pm
by MD-2389
bash wrote:Are you claiming that masturbation is pornographic?
Prove it isn't.
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 10:34 pm
by bash
Heh, thanks for the laughs, fellas.
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 10:37 pm
by MD-2389
bash wrote:Heh, thanks for the laughs, fellas.
Concession accepted.
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 10:37 pm
by Ferno
hey no problem. i'm just glad i could accomodate
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 10:44 pm
by Ferno
Tyranny wrote:So, it is a two way street sometimes and I think that is why for a lot of men, women are very confusing because on the one hand, they DO dress to get our attention "sometimes" and on the other hand they don't, but they get it anyways, you follow me?
Only reason it's confusing is because the uneducated male mind goes from point a to point b with no deviation. but you throw some checks and balances in between point a and point b and you'll start to see the forest for the trees.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 2:50 am
by Tyranny
Guys guys guys....
MD, Ferno, you're both barking up the wrong tree here as far as Bash is concerned because he is absolutely correct in his statements and you guys are just making yourselves look silly, I hate to say :/.
Masterbation or sex in general is not pornography. Nor is a dildo a pornographic item just by itself. Watching someone else masterbate on FILM or via photos IS pornography. See the difference? The actual act in person does not constitute as pornography.
If you video taped it, or did a webcam or took some pictures, then had other people look at those pictures or watch the video then it is pornography.
The line is somewhat scewed since sex and masterbation is dipicted in pornographic material, but it only becomes porn when other people watch it through media outlets.
Now, can't we all just get along?
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 3:17 am
by HaAGen DaZS
178 replies, 1600+ veiws.
a topic about porn.
and the only remotly close images to that of an erotic sense are "
"
i think im ashamed of you guys...
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 4:08 am
by Nirvana
is sorta like the "oh face"
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 4:34 am
by HaAGen DaZS
like that time bash.. er.. nm...
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:37 am
by Beowulf
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:44 am
by Ferno
I'm just goofin around tyr.
If you figured i was in any way serious... LOL
Some posts were serious. but most (where I was picking on bash, like a big brother) weren't. you know I lurb joo.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 11:01 am
by TheCops
NO.
i win! i'm right! no one is better than me! i can type all day and find problems in all your arguments! i can't just chill out and accept that people roll differently than me. i'm right. i'm the bestest!
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 4:45 pm
by woodchip
So I guess the band "Steely Dan" was pornographic as their name alludes to a dildo?
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 4:53 pm
by Neo
Wow I'ma skip reading this cuz it's like 5 Web pages long! ^_~ I'm just gonna add my 2 centz:
I notice that nobody has any shame about stuff like this anymore. Tetrad publically admits that he likes pr0n, and MD-2389 is openly ghey...
I just want to say that I don't like pr0n mail either and I want the stuff to be filtered out of my searches and stuff...it's annoying not to be able to get at something whenever I type "vector analysis."
Say no to pr0n! ^_~
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 6:11 pm
by Tyranny
Neo wrote:Wow I'ma skip reading this cuz it's like 5 Web pages long! ^_~ I'm just gonna add my 2 centz:
I notice that nobody has any shame about stuff like this anymore. Tetrad publically admits that he likes pr0n, and MD-2389 is openly ghey...
I just want to say that I don't like pr0n mail either and I want the stuff to be filtered out of my searches and stuff...it's annoying not to be able to get at something whenever I type "vector analysis."
Say no to pr0n! ^_~
See kiddies, this is why it pays to read all the pages...
Didn't we phase out porn mail being relevant to the overall topic on page 1?
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 6:25 pm
by Ferno
yea pretty much.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 6:54 pm
by MD-2389
Tyranny wrote:Guys guys guys....
MD, Ferno, you're both barking up the wrong tree here as far as Bash is concerned because he is absolutely correct in his statements and you guys are just making yourselves look silly, I hate to say :/.
Not really. I was trying to goad bash into actually DEBATING instead of his usual "prove it
" responses and endless edit games.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 7:31 pm
by bash
Digressing yet further... (keep in mind, folks, these guys are moderators).
MD, find me these instances where I have posted simply *Prove it* if that is my usual response. Such challenges I usually leave for twits like you who never can back their sh|t up (such as your above claim) or who rarely offer more than a one sentence (often ad hominem) contribution to any discussion. And what do you find dastardly about editing
before anyone has even posted a response for the purpose of correcting spelling, grammar and/or clarification? btw, you troglodyte, Tyr was being kind in terming your behavior *silly*. Whether you want to believe it or not, anyone with an education beyond the 5th grade had to have been laughing their azz off at your moronic, knuckle-dragging opinions. I'm convinced, given a few more posts, I could have had you claiming even procreation was pornographic (but frankly you were beginning to bore me). You are the Muqtada al-Sadr of the DBB, jumping around like a monkey, thrusting your fist in they air chanting *victory*, all the while getting your butt shot off.
Now, go away before I taunt you again.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 8:45 pm
by Tetrad
Aww I feel left out.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 8:52 pm
by Gooberman
Heh, after that I am going to take Bashâ??s infamous
â??s as compliments.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 9:35 pm
by bash
Tetrad, that's just your left hand talking.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:02 pm
by Tetrad
bash wrote: who rarely offer more than a one sentence (often ad hominem) contribution to any discussion.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:10 pm
by bash
That was attacking you? I thought you were proud of your masturbation. What was I thinking that maybe you'd see it as the joke it was presented as? Sheesh, Tetrad, grow a funny bone and not just a boner.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:16 pm
by Ferno
LOL @ Bash.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:24 pm
by Tetrad
Heh, I just thought it was ironic.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:31 pm
by Tetrad
Well I wasn't the one complaining about it now was I?
Oh, good, you deleted your post. I'm just going to leave this here then.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:34 pm
by bash
I decided you required the last word or you'd drone on and on. Oops, I'll be deleting this so you can dole out your brutal comeuppance upon me. No bukakke, though.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:34 pm
by Tyranny
lol
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:36 pm
by bash
Damn, Tyr, you've blocked me in. Curses! Folks, consider my previous post stricken from the record. Oh, um, and this one, too.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:38 pm
by Tetrad
Well regardless, I'm still waiting on people to respond to my previous posts.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:51 pm
by Ferno
is there any specific post you want answered Tetrad? I'll give it a shot.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 11:10 pm
by Tetrad
Only question directed at nobody in particular would be my second post on page 4.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 11:35 pm
by Lothar
Is someone willing to split this thread, and send the last page or so (after Tyranny's April 10, 11:30am post) to NHB where we can finish flaming each other? (I have my own flame to add, but I'd rather not contribute to the decline of a once-interesting thread.) My wife and I both have responses to the serious part of this thread mostly worked up, but there's such a mess of trolling and flaming over the last page that the thread has lost focus.
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2004 11:52 pm
by Ferno
oh we can regain it just as easy Lothar.
Tetrad wrote:Yea, well, things change when the opposing opinion is head of the department of justice and trying to enforce it on everybody else.
I guess they have nothing better to do than to figure out how to snub out competition.
Really.. if you think they're doing it to 'clean up the airwaves' you're dead wrong. they're going after skinflicks, leftism radio, and anything that doesn't agree with their bible. because it's competition. plain and simple.