Re: What Shariah means:
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 8:48 pm
.
Fair enough the R's and D's are all the same these days.Bet51987 wrote:Try an R. It was George that said bad people hijacked a religion. The truth was that bad people believed what they read in that book. There was no hijack.Will Robinson wrote: I think you should run for office with a D by your name, you already have the attitude down pat.
Bee
Bettina, I am not trying to equate their words, merely show the wide range of results due to actions in their names. Clearly, the tone of Jesus' message was gentler(I stated that a while back), but has to be taken in the whole flow of the Bible, which includes the Old Testament. Likewise, the Koran has peaceful messages, along with very strident ones. Further, it reflects an altogether different culture(Arabian Bedouin as opposed to Israel, which was frequently subjugated).Bet51987 wrote:Seriously, I wait for you to equate the works of Jesus with the works of Mohammad.
Bettina
well, feck all, if you aren't an expert. FWIW, I went to school and have worked my whole adult life with practicing muslims and still wouldn't claim expertise. Just a more open view to what the religion manifests as.Will Robinson wrote:After 9-11-2001 I got very interested in the region and have read a bit and paid attention to a lot of sources of info especially the live ones who lived there.
sometimes, it's attitude, sometimes, it's just plain obvious truth.....You have more than just a touch of condescending superiority in your constant reminders that 'we aren't smart enough, 'we don't know enough', to comment on current events. I think you should run for office with a D by your name, you already have the attitude down pat.
So sayeth the self absorbed, the delusional and falling pomegranatescallmeslick wrote:
sometimes, it's attitude, sometimes, it's just plain obvious truth.....You have more than just a touch of condescending superiority in your constant reminders that 'we aren't smart enough, 'we don't know enough', to comment on current events. I think you should run for office with a D by your name, you already have the attitude down pat.
I can attest to that, you really don’t know someone till you live with them.flip wrote:A work relationship means nothing Slick. People usually put aside their differences at the workplace.
Truth?!? Like the "truth" you tried to create with those few sentences you chopped out of the source that pretty much contradicts the point you were trying to make.callmeslick wrote:...sometimes, it's attitude, sometimes, it's just plain obvious truth.....You have more than just a touch of condescending superiority in your constant reminders that 'we aren't smart enough, 'we don't know enough', to comment on current events. I think you should run for office with a D by your name, you already have the attitude down pat.
Spidey wrote:I can attest to that, you really don’t know someone till you live with them.flip wrote:A work relationship means nothing Slick. People usually put aside their differences at the workplace.
My father taught them English at SAIC out of Fort Bliss, TX. They were friendly and we invited them to dinner. We were told it would be 'best' if my mother didn't dine with us (in their presence) in our own home.ok, how many Muslims have you(or any of the rest of you) lived with? I'll allow for dorm or other group situations(barracks, hostels, etc).
The theory works with any group of people. And “lived with” in this context does not mean in the same house…callmeslick wrote:Spidey wrote:I can attest to that, you really don’t know someone till you live with them.flip wrote:A work relationship means nothing Slick. People usually put aside their differences at the workplace.
ok, how many Muslims have you(or any of the rest of you) lived with? I'll allow for dorm or other group situations(barracks, hostels, etc).
I disagree Spidey. My house you have to submit to my customs, and vice-versa. I would have had strong words for someone that comes in my house and tries to tell my wife where she stands.TB, that sounds like a perfectly reasonable cultural exchange to me…
It really wasn't my place to say- my parents just decided to go along with it so as not to ruffle feathers for my father at work and so on. Seemed like a semi-innocuous request at the time- as it is customary in many asian cultures for women to stay away from the men when visitors discussed "business." (As offensive as it would be for us in the west.)TB could have said no…yes?
Bet51987 wrote:Anyway, see you in the next debate where we may even agree...but it won't be about Islam.
Bee
But what you'd really be referring to is marketing, not religion.Heretic wrote:Is it not true that politics is a belief system also? Seeing how a belief system can refer to religion, life stance, ideology, world view, or any number of other philosophies. It's also true that a that a political discussion is circular.
to some extent true, but religious discussions hinge on fundamentals that cannot be proven(what is in the hearts and beliefs of people). In most political discussions, one has historical, economic and other facts to bring to bear.Heretic wrote:Is it not true that politics is a belief system also? Seeing how a belief system can refer to religion, life stance, ideology, world view, or any number of other philosophies. It's also true that a that a political discussion is circular.
The current state of politics depends so little on those things that religion is nice euphemism for the practice.callmeslick wrote:...
In most political discussions, one has historical, economic and other facts to bring to bear.