Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:54 pm
Federalized
Now there’s a scary word.
Now there’s a scary word.
Then they go on to say, for the benefiet of our pea-sized brains:A carbon tax is a tax on the carbon content of fuels — effectively a tax on the carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels. Thus, carbon tax is shorthand for carbon dioxide tax or CO2 tax.
But what's this? There's suddenly a theory thrown in here, misleadingly attatched to the same paragraph as the above scientific facts:Carbon atoms are present in every fossil fuel — coal, oil and gas — as is hydrogen. The bond between hydrogen and carbon atoms is the primary source of energy from fossil fuels and of the heat released in fuel combustion. Essentially all carbon atoms are converted to CO2 when the fuel is burned.
I must have been off in the woods when this was proven, and people must have forgotten it was proven after a few minutes...Then they go onto explainCarbon dioxide, an otherwise non-lethal and innocuous gas, rises in the atmosphere and remains resident there, trapping heat re-radiated from Earth’s surface and causing global warming and other harmful climate change.
Thinking about every carbon release in the world (like ex-haling), it makes you \"breathe easier\" (har har ) to know they're just planning on taxing your smoke.In contrast, non-combustion energy sources — wind, sunlight, falling water, atomic fission — do not convert carbon to carbon dioxide. Accordingly, a carbon tax (or CO2 tax) is effectively a tax on the use of fossil fuels, and only fossil fuels.
\"Well, Al Gore thinks this is how the world works, so give us some money so we can take care of it!\"The rationale for a carbon tax is simple: the levels of CO2 already in the Earth’s atmosphere and being added daily are destabilizing established climate patterns and threatening the ecosystems on which we and other living beings depend. Very large and rapid reductions in the United States’ and other nations’ carbon emissions are essential to reverse runaway climate change and avert resulting severe weather events, inundation of coastal areas, spread of diseases, failure of agriculture and water supply, infrastructure destruction, forced migrations, political upheavals and international conflict.
A carbon tax must be the central mechanism for reducing carbon emissions.
What kind of braindead TV junkie, blind jackasses do they take us for?A carbon tax should be revenue-neutral. Revenue-neutral means that little if any of the tax revenues raised by taxing carbon emissions would be retained by government. The vast majority of the revenues would be returned to the public, with, perhaps, a very small amount utilized to mitigate the otherwise negative impacts of carbon taxes on low-income energy users.
Yeah...'cause you don't have TIME.Carbon taxes can be implemented much sooner than complex cap-and-trade systems. Because of the urgency of the climate crisis, we do not have the luxury of waiting while the myriad details of a cap-and-trade system are resolved through lengthy negotiations.
Disgusting...this is one, giant, special interest.Carbon taxes can be implemented with far less opportunity for manipulation by special interests, while a cap-and-trade system’s complexity opens it to exploitation by special interests and perverse incentives that can undermine public confidence and undercut its effectiveness.
We're so ****ing evil. We should bow our heads in shame. Further more, we need to get this done before anybody even knows about it!the U.S. will continue to be the world’s biggest contributor to global climate change long after China, or even India, surpasses us in annual emissions. That’s because carbon dioxide molecules, once emitted, remain “resident” in the atmosphere for approximately a century. Considering the many decades in which America’s carbon emissions dwarfed everyone else’s, of the CO2 now warming Earth, more than three times as much is the product of American emissions as Chinese emissions.
Someone's seen The Day After Tomarrow enough to believe this garbage--oh, wait, I forgot, it's the TV-fueled middle class who walk in a perpetual trance and buy into whatever's shown to them. Here's #193. How serious is the climate crisis?
We agree with Al Gore and scientists such as Sir David King and James Hansen that the continued buildup of greenhouse gases in Earth’s atmosphere portends worldwide cataclysmic change in the very near future. Hotter summers are the least of what’s in store for humanity. Destructive storms, inundation of coastal regions, decimation of food chains, spreading disease, economic devastation, warfare and massive migrations of humans and other species are all virtual certainties in the lifetimes of most people now living, unless the world makes sharp cuts in greenhouse gases.
Of course, let's make a problem with an agendized solution! The truth is, and the reason I've added this to this topic, this is just another hidden agenda, anyone but Ray Charles could see it. Potential carbon leakage? Come--freakin'--on, this is an act to move towards a global agenda. Obama's the chairperson of the U.N. Security council AND the president of the U.S. You can't serve two masters.19. Must carbon taxes be global to work?
A carbon tax can be applied locally, nationally or globally. A global carbon tax is certainly preferable, not just because the climate crisis is global but because it would avert potential leakage by carbon emitters attempting to move their combustion of carbon from jurisdictions that tax carbon to those that do not.
Dancing with the ★■◆●ing stars and Kareem? Lindsay Lohan??? MY ASS.Yahoo! main page wrote:Popular Searches:
Dancing With the…
Kareem Abdul-Jab…
Nidal Hasan
Elton John
Rick Astley Virus
Lindsay Lohan
Motorola Droid
John Allen Muham…
Pakistan Taliban
NFL Power Rankin…