Re: The collateral damage of the race pimps war for power
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 1:19 am
Still waiting for solutions from the race pimp experts.
The Descent Bulletin Board
https://descentbb.net/
And we are waiting for you to display the maturity and sincerity that warrants an answer....vision wrote:Still waiting for solutions from the race pimp experts.
as soon as they get done focusing on me,and return to their usual bigotry, they might ponder your request. Doubtful, though.vision wrote:Still waiting for solutions from the race pimp experts.
You can go it in line behind vision since you are not ready for the big kids discussion either.callmeslick wrote:as soon as they get done focusing on me,and return to their usual bigotry, they might ponder your request. Doubtful, though.vision wrote:Still waiting for solutions from the race pimp experts.
fixed. Apparently some sort of sick spell correction turned the proper word into 'big kids'. Technology!Will Robinson wrote:You can go it in line behind vision since you are not ready for the bigots discussion either.callmeslick wrote:as soon as they get done focusing on me,and return to their usual bigotry, they might ponder your request. Doubtful, though.vision wrote:Still waiting for solutions from the race pimp experts.
you mean gunslinging morons? Nah, I'll continue to prefer a society without those, thanks. That is why I pay for public services.woodchip wrote:Back to the OP. Slick once said how if he came upon a scene where someone was getting mugged or shooting was going on how he'd cower in the corner and call 911. It is a good thing there are more action minded people around.
it is amazing that it didn't turn into a bloodbath.Local news interviewed the woman who intervened and saved the beaten mans life. Seem she saw what was going on, put a gun in her pocket and waded into the middle of the mob. She then got down and embraced the man to protect him. When asked if she would of used the gun, she said if it became necessary she would of. Thankfully she did not have to. Now I realize slick would consider her a idiot and a loon but everyone in Detroit considers her a true hero. Out of the 150 people standing around, cowering and doing nothing, she came out and did something. I quite frankly think she is amazing.
Yea, right, because before the lady with the gun stopped the mob it was just a harmless disagreement between the driver and some misunderstood victims of society. She came along and turned it into something dangerous!callmeslick wrote:...
it is amazing that it didn't turn into a bloodbath.
Only to youcallmeslick wrote:please, try not to take stupid to a new level.......wading into a mob, solo, with a handgun is idiotic.
Laughed out loud! That's some comedy gold right there.callmeslick wrote:Apparently some sort of sick spell correction turned the proper word into 'big kids'. Technology!
Argument: "race pimps" did this.Will Robinson wrote:This group that almost, in fact may yet have, killed the driver wouldn't have done what they did if not for the community agitation tactics that keep their anger boiling to the brim so it can be tapped to serve their 'leaders'.
Do the right thing but you might get beat to death.
Yes I totally trust your average drooling moron 'MURKIN with a deadly weapon.woodchip wrote:Back to the OP. Slick once said how if he came upon a scene where someone was getting mugged or shooting was going on how he'd cower in the corner and call 911. It is a good thing there are more action minded people around. Local news interviewed the woman who intervened and saved the beaten mans life. Seem she saw what was going on, put a gun in her pocket and waded into the middle of the mob. She then got down and embraced the man to protect him. When asked if she would of used the gun, she said if it became necessary she would of. Thankfully she did not have to. Now I realize slick would consider her a idiot and a loon but everyone in Detroit considers her a true hero. Out of the 150 people standing around, cowering and doing nothing, she came out and did something. I quite frankly think she is amazing.
Political ads work. That's why politicians use them. And those ads are, thanks to technology, custom made for individuals. So no, this shouldn't be any trouble at all to make the connection if one exists.woodchip wrote:Trying to show a direct link to the Detroit mob is like saying, "Show me a direct link between political ads and how a particular person voted".
Had to look up Murkin and was surprised how you slandered a black woman in such a manner. I guess your racist view, especially trying to paint black women as prostitutes, is pretty far down in the gutter.Top Gun wrote:Yes I totally trust your average drooling moron 'MURKIN with a deadly weapon.woodchip wrote:Back to the OP. Slick once said how if he came upon a scene where someone was getting mugged or shooting was going on how he'd cower in the corner and call 911. It is a good thing there are more action minded people around. Local news interviewed the woman who intervened and saved the beaten mans life. Seem she saw what was going on, put a gun in her pocket and waded into the middle of the mob. She then got down and embraced the man to protect him. When asked if she would of used the gun, she said if it became necessary she would of. Thankfully she did not have to. Now I realize slick would consider her a idiot and a loon but everyone in Detroit considers her a true hero. Out of the 150 people standing around, cowering and doing nothing, she came out and did something. I quite frankly think she is amazing.
Show me where I said this. What is idiotic is you attributing viewpoints to me that you made up in your head.Will Robinson wrote:This has been going on for decades and you trying to dismiss it or pretend it isn't having an impact on the behavior of many black people in a negative way towards white people is the most idiotic thing you have done here.
Lol! More flip flopping?vision wrote:Show me where I said this. What is idiotic is you attributing viewpoints to me that you made up in your head.Will Robinson wrote:This has been going on for decades and you trying to dismiss it or pretend it isn't having an impact on the behavior of many black people in a negative way towards white people is the most idiotic thing you have done here.
Stop supporting them. Stop making excuses for them. Start speaking out about the damage they do. If a cop calling a black suspect "black" in a description is harmful as you have said then certainly the lessons of hate toward 'the white devil' are an even bigger problem. Be consistent in your principles instead of knee-jerk politically expedient.vision wrote:Still waiting on some expert solutions to the problem of race-pimping.
Does it take willful effort to be this stupid, or does it just come naturally to you? I'd be fascinated to know.woodchip wrote:Had to look up Murkin and was surprised how you slandered a black woman in such a manner. I guess your racist view, especially trying to paint black women as prostitutes, is pretty far down in the gutter.
"www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=murkin Cached
a misspelled merkin i.e. a fur piece for the pubic area of women of the 14th and 15th centuries. "
In case you didn't bother to check, not only was the heroine black, she was also a EMS worker. Way to go TG, you scored really big points on this reply. What a complete ass.
I guess I'm stupid as I don't have a clue as to why you are name calling after posting what you did.Top Gun wrote:Does it take willful effort to be this stupid, or does it just come naturally to you? I'd be fascinated to know.woodchip wrote:Had to look up Murkin and was surprised how you slandered a black woman in such a manner. I guess your racist view, especially trying to paint black women as prostitutes, is pretty far down in the gutter.
"www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=murkin Cached
a misspelled merkin i.e. a fur piece for the pubic area of women of the 14th and 15th centuries. "
In case you didn't bother to check, not only was the heroine black, she was also a EMS worker. Way to go TG, you scored really big points on this reply. What a complete ass.
funny, I hang with activists of color a fair bit(I suspect far more than you) and I haven't heard that line in decades. ESPECIALLY after the election of Barack Obama.Will Robinson wrote:Vision you are delusional if you think most people aren't aware of the incessant agitation message of 'the-white-man-is-to-blame' for the problems faced by black people.
not half as idiotic as the incessiant white-boy-whine you spew here.This has been going on for decades and you trying to dismiss it or pretend it isn't having an impact on the behavior of many black people in a negative way towards white people is the most idiotic thing you have done here.
I've lived in America my whole life, and I'm here to tell you that you AREN'T close to 'correct'. You are a hateful relic of a miserable past. Most of us, even most of us in the civilized parts of the South, have left this crap behind a long time ago.I'm completely confident that most people reading this know I'm correct in that assertion as most of them live in America and will have seen and heard it for themselves.
I don't have any need to prove water is wet. Your challenge is rejected based on its completely ridiculous and false premise.
IF there is a racial aspect to what is going on then BOTH sides are perpetuating it. only a fool would say otherwiseAttorney General Eric Holder blamed Republicans for consistently attacking him and Barack Obama because they are black, going off-script to level the charge during a speech Wednesday night.
In a speech to supporters of (he's an irrelevant player) Rev. Al Sharpton's National Action Network, Holder improvised a complaint about his rough treatment on Capitol Hill the day before.
'What attorney general has ever had to deal with that kind of treatment?' he said, alluding to his status as the only African-American ever to hold that post.
Sharpton's group is a 23-year-old organization comprised of black civil rights activists, making Holder's comments appear to be a statement about his race, and President Obama's.
Decorations on the stage backdrop where he spoke included the slogan 'No Justice, No Peace
Holder famously claimed in 2009, and again in 2014, that America has historically been 'a nation of cowards' on racial issues.
On Wednesday he appeared to lay that burden at Republicans' feet.
'The last five years have been defined by significant strides and by lasting reforms even in the face, even in the face of unprecedented, unwarranted, ugly and divisive adversity,' Holder said.
'If you don’t believe that, you look at the way – forget about me, forget about me – you look at the way the attorney general of the United States was treated yesterday by a House committee.
It 'has nothing to do with me, forget that,' he said. 'What attorney general has ever had to deal with that kind of treatment? What president has ever had to deal with that kind of treatment
actually, THERE, I might agree. Hardly, the classic political actor types. Similar misogyny comes in other types of music as well. That wasn't my thrust. I was simply trying to deal with the fact that blaming old-school Black Activists was really off base.woodchip wrote:Slick you must be living in another world. Just tune into MTV and listen to the lyrics of rap music. Agitators come in many forms, not just the well to do parlor types you know.
maybe the ones that okayed Guantanamo would draw an immediate nod here......Will Robinson wrote: has there been a more rogue AG than Holder?
Will, I'm not going to create a catalog, but to answer your question: This shows contempt and hate for black people when anyone can step back and see that mob behavior, this bad or worse, happens in EVERY culture, or virtually every culture. That sort of thinking I consider 'hateful'.Will Robinson wrote:....unless you can show me how all people, when grouped together, would react the way the black people in these examples did then you are ignoring, wilfully, the probable cause of the acts.
No slick, it shows that, as the thread topic should have clued you in, I think black people are being manipulated disproportionately to be aggitated towards the white people thus resulting in the ABNORMAL results. Sure, there is certainly a mob behavior component in all races but what that manifests into isn't uniform across all the races in this particular case.....callmeslick wrote:Will, I'm not going to create a catalog, but to answer your question: This shows contempt and hate for black people when anyone can step back and see that mob behavior, this bad or worse, happens in EVERY culture, or virtually every culture. That sort of thinking I consider 'hateful'.Will Robinson wrote:....unless you can show me how all people, when grouped together, would react the way the black people in these examples did then you are ignoring, wilfully, the probable cause of the acts.
To a extent I agree with you except show me over the last 30-40 years where gangs of whites have attacked black people compared to the numbers of black mobs attacking whitescallmeslick wrote:Will, I'm not going to create a catalog, but to answer your question: This shows contempt and hate for black people when anyone can step back and see that mob behavior, this bad or worse, happens in EVERY culture, or virtually every culture. That sort of thinking I consider 'hateful'.Will Robinson wrote:....unless you can show me how all people, when grouped together, would react the way the black people in these examples did then you are ignoring, wilfully, the probable cause of the acts.
FFS...you've never heard the sardonic term "MURIKA" used to refer to the less-than-intelligent aspects of our country? And instead you thought I was referring to a 16th-century term for pubic hair? Why in God's name would I even know that word, much less use it in a situation where it doesn't apply in the least?woodchip wrote:I guess I'm stupid as I don't have a clue as to why you are name calling after posting what you did.Top Gun wrote:Does it take willful effort to be this stupid, or does it just come naturally to you? I'd be fascinated to know.woodchip wrote:Had to look up Murkin and was surprised how you slandered a black woman in such a manner. I guess your racist view, especially trying to paint black women as prostitutes, is pretty far down in the gutter.
"www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=murkin Cached
a misspelled merkin i.e. a fur piece for the pubic area of women of the 14th and 15th centuries. "
In case you didn't bother to check, not only was the heroine black, she was also a EMS worker. Way to go TG, you scored really big points on this reply. What a complete ass.
show me to a sourcing for any sort of scientific data and I'll compare away in my free time. Until then, suffice it to say there are mob attacks involving blacks, whites, hispanics, Asians, Christians, Jews, Moslems, and atheists. Mobs of leftists, mobs of rightwing zealots. It cuts across pretty much every demographic except for one: Gender. I fail to come up with much in the way of all-female mob attacks, although I can recall isolated, generally urban cases.woodchip wrote:To a extent I agree with you except show me over the last 30-40 years where gangs of whites have attacked black people compared to the numbers of black mobs attacking whitescallmeslick wrote:Will, I'm not going to create a catalog, but to answer your question: This shows contempt and hate for black people when anyone can step back and see that mob behavior, this bad or worse, happens in EVERY culture, or virtually every culture. That sort of thinking I consider 'hateful'.Will Robinson wrote:....unless you can show me how all people, when grouped together, would react the way the black people in these examples did then you are ignoring, wilfully, the probable cause of the acts.
yes, and it starts with your description above. As often is the case with warped pictures.Spidey wrote:So let’s see…
The one person in the crowd that does the right thing gets ridiculed and called a moron.
The people who perpetrated the attacks have excuses made for them.
The people who ask questions trying to make sense of what they see going on around them get called racist.
There is something horribly horribly wrong with this picture.
Show me where I said people can't be influenced along racial lines by rhetoric. I certainly believe in "race pimps" because you are clearly one. However, racial tensions are caused my a myriad of factors and I don't believe the current group of racists like Sharpton and Jackson have nearly as much influence as you claim, just like your white-pimping fails to move me. This is because for words to have any effect there needs to be an experience to relate. You seem to think that black people are such dullards they can't do anything but be told what to do. If black folks fall in line with racial agitation it is because they are already experiencing racism, otherwise they would simply disagree. And even those who do experience racism disagree with agitators, just like I disagree with your agitation.Will Robinson wrote:So are you now in agreement that the race pimps are having an influence on the level of hatred that many blacks have toward whites.
You have a highly polarized outlook on life. Complex social problems are never binary.Will Robinson wrote:Either you agree that it is happening or you don't.
Show me where I ever supported racism. Show me where I ever made excuses or justified racism. By the way, when people complain about racism you don't tell them to stop talking, you try to do a better job listening.vision wrote:Stop supporting them. Stop making excuses for them. Start speaking out about the damage they do. If a cop calling a black suspect "black" in a description is harmful as you have said then certainly the lessons of hate toward 'the white devil' are an even bigger problem.
You are an extreme hypocrite. Or in which instance were you completely full of crap? Now or then?vision wrote:Show me where I said people can't be influenced along racial lines by rhetoric. I certainly believe in "race pimps" because you are clearly one. However, racial tensions are caused my a myriad of factors and I don't believe the current group of racists like Sharpton and Jackson have nearly as much influence as you claim, just like your white-pimping fails to move me. This is because for words to have any effect there needs to be an experience to relate. You seem to think that black people are such dullards they can't do anything but be told what to do. If black folks fall in line with racial agitation it is because they are already experiencing racism, otherwise they would simply disagree. And even those who do experience racism disagree with agitators, just like I disagree with your agitation.Will Robinson wrote:So are you now in agreement that the race pimps are having an influence on the level of hatred that many blacks have toward whites.
It wasn't the complex social problem I was pointing at.vision wrote:You have a highly polarized outlook on life. Complex social problems are never binary.Will Robinson wrote:Either you agree that it is happening or you don't.
Lol, you are trying to equate the machinations of Sharpton, et al with 'people complaining'?!?vision wrote:.... By the way, when people complain about racism you don't tell them to stop talking, you try to do a better job listening. ...
Says the guy who cant find it when he alleges it happened but wields the label none the less like a weapon because shouting "racism" is a great way to stifle conversation.callmeslick wrote:next month, Vision? It will be no more than a week or so before another bigotted, assumption-filled race rant. Guaranteed!