DescentBB

In my opinion, more than 30 countries already have the moral right to make little hooliganism in the United States, as the United States hooligans in Ukraine and Iraq now.

And why do you or I can not trust the Russian media and statements by the Russian Government? Are there any reasons? Please give examples.
While I can justifiably be called the statement of the American administration liars who disrespect to the international community. You know, when I read the news reporters on the major Western news resources, I never lost the feeling that they do not set out the facts, do not analyze, and they tell the tale, as for children. With an abundance of adjectives and phrases, which can be seen only in what some artistic novel.

If you think nobody can tell Russia's involved with the Ukraine civil war, then you think we're stupid. It's ★■◆●ing obvious: The Ukraine had rioters in the street, armed with air rifles and rocks. Suddenly Russia pulls their military up to the border and we see Ukraine tanks being mobilised along with anti-air missiles. There's no coincidence. Russia has agents fighting in Ukraine for the sole purpose of annexing the Ukraine.

If you can't tell that your media is feeding you bull★■◆● then you're a bigger sheep than you're accusing others of being. Wake the ★■◆● up.

sigma wrote:
And why do you or I can not trust the Russian media and statements by the Russian Government? Are there any reasons? Please give examples.

Yes, at least 2 journalist have quick the state run news because they were not allowed to report accurately what was going on in the Ukraine

sigma wrote:I...

And why do you or I can not trust the Russian media and statements by the Russian Government? Are there any reasons?
...

If your Russian media hasn't already provided you with those examples it is for their own survival they hide them and you will never be allowed to see them.
Is that the kind of media you trust? The kind you deserve?

In America we have a 'free' media. At times it operates slightly less than free and those times it does great damage to our system of government by only relatively minor submission to control of a manipulation. Your media has been COMPLETELY manipulated for many decades. The damage you have suffered is severe.

Isaac wrote:If you think nobody can tell Russia's involved with the Ukraine civil war, then you think we're stupid. It's **** obvious: The Ukraine had rioters in the street, armed with air rifles and rocks. Suddenly Russia pulls their military up to the border and we see Ukraine tanks being mobilised along with anti-air missiles. There's no coincidence. Russia has agents fighting in Ukraine for the sole purpose of annexing the Ukraine.

If you can't tell that your media is feeding you **** then you're a bigger sheep than you're accusing others of being. Wake the **** up.

Perhaps you think that I will now explain to you again, that was the reason for the civil war in Ukraine, which led to the desire of the people of the Crimea to join Russia, which was the impetus for the revision of European attitudes to the United States and the impetus for the development of the agricultural and military sector in Russia? No-o-o, I would not do it more often. It's starting to like me. That you are getting the wrong information from your media, and you are in a happy delusion about the real state of affairs. Although I always wonder what you think about Russia.

Of course the U.S. is at fault for all the uprisings that have occurred. We invented Facebook and Twitter, not Russia. We setup a shitty government is Iraq, not Russia. We destabilized the middle east, not Russia. That's not groundbreaking news. Even children here know these events.

If you think I've been brainwashed into believing the U.S. is a perfect nation, then you're the one that's brainwashed. My news comes in clearer than yours.

Ummm, the middle east was stable before Iraq?

The way I see it, Saddam Hussein was our make-shift shitty stabilizer. Didn't make things 100% stable, but stable enough for our liking. If any of the local factions tried anything he'd kill em all without question. Once we took him out and left the area there was a big power vacuum making it "party time" for anyone with an AK-47.

Later the uprisings happened because of a facebook post by a Muslim American.

Really!!!!! Russia had no involvement?

HRM wonder where all those Russian made AK-47's came from

Uh, they'll sell to anyone... My friend owns an AK... many people do. I shot a full auto-AK on my birthday.

I hate getting an AK in any video game. Inaccurate for hitting anything but the broadside of a barn.

tunnelcat wrote:I hate getting an AK in any video game. Inaccurate for hitting anything but the broadside of a barn.

You touch the strings of my heart, Cat In conventional military shooters AK-47 is a basic weapon, and of course, I do not really like it. But it is much better than the other basic weapons, despite a greater return of AK. However, my favorite sets - this is SVD (Dragunov sniper rifle) + Desert Eagle, or analogues Heckler & Koch G36 + Desert Eagle. As for the Descent, I do not have a favorite weapon, because it is highly dependent on the situation

sigma wrote:

tunnelcat wrote:I hate getting an AK in any video game. Inaccurate for hitting anything but the broadside of a barn.

You touch the strings of my heart, Cat In conventional military shooters AK-47 is a basic weapon, and of course, I do not really like it. But it is much better than the other basic weapons, despite a greater return of AK. However, my favorite sets - this is SVD (Dragunov sniper rifle) + Desert Eagle, or analogues Heckler & Koch G36 + Desert Eagle. As for the Descent, I do not have a favorite weapon, because it is highly dependent on the situation

Well, the Golden AK was great in Far Cry 3 because it never jammed. But it was still inaccurate. I personally like the Barret 50 cal Sniper Rifle and the M4 Carbine that shoots 5.56 mm NATO rounds. There's a couple of others from the Modern Warfare series, but I can't think of their names right now. As for Descent 2, I personally like the Gauss Gun the best. Robots can't see it coming so they can't dodge, and it hits hard. I also like the Earth Shaker missile. The sound effects were nice and it rattled and kicked everything in the area.

TC, go shoot an AK in full auto. You're gonna hit everything. It's fun.

Sigma, the Dessert Eagle is a ridiculous gun, however, they have issues, like failing to feed with certain kinds of ammo. They're mostly a novelty gun, from what I gather. I've seen a few and have yet to try one, since getting hold of one is kind of difficult. I'd much rather try out the new Walther PPQ in 9mm with the mag release on the trigger guard.

Isaac, If you want a machine gun that has a very controllable rate of climb I suggest you look into this:
http://kriss-usa.com/

To compare a AK47 is like comparing driving a dump truck to a jaguar.

Isaac wrote:Sigma, the Dessert Eagle is a ridiculous gun, however, they have issues, like failing to feed with certain kinds of ammo. They're mostly a novelty gun, from what I gather. I've seen a few and have yet to try one, since getting hold of one is kind of difficult. I'd much rather try out the new Walther PPQ in 9mm with the mag release on the trigger guard.

That is correct, Isaac. I will never take Desert Eagle for attack. It is good for a sniper who sits in ambush, because it kills with a single shot to the head and two shots pierces body armor. As the assault gun is my favorite Walther P99 or Arsenal "Strike One".

woodchip wrote:Isaac, If you want a machine gun that has a very controllable rate of climb I suggest you look into this:
http://kriss-usa.com/

To compare a AK47 is like comparing driving a dump truck to a jaguar.

They got a Kriss vector at the range I go to. I really want to rent it, but haven't had a chance to go out there since they got it. I watched a video on how to field strip the thing without any tools or tiny parts. Talking about SBRs, the P90 is one I'd really like to try. However, I'd much rather shoot 45ACP than that nato approved min-bullet that the P90 squirts.

sigma wrote:

Isaac wrote:Sigma, the Dessert Eagle is a ridiculous gun, however, they have issues, like failing to feed with certain kinds of ammo. They're mostly a novelty gun, from what I gather. I've seen a few and have yet to try one, since getting hold of one is kind of difficult. I'd much rather try out the new Walther PPQ in 9mm with the mag release on the trigger guard.

That is correct, Isaac. I will never take Desert Eagle for attack. It is good for a sniper who sits in ambush, because it kills with a single shot to the head and two shots pierces body armor. As the assault gun is my favorite Walther P99 or Arsenal "Strike One".

Yeah, and I think a Russian sniper would rather grab a dusty beaten up Mosin Nagant than take an untested shiney desert eagle to battle. I love the Mosin Nagant. I almost buy one every time I see one. The only thing I hate about it is the caliber. It's hard to find at the store.

Now, sigma, if you could convince your government to release a new line of Mosin Nagants in 30-06, I'd really appreciate it. Hell, even .308 would be fine.

You mean the rifle? Unfortunately, that would be a bit silly now to call Vladimir requesting that he began production of Mosin Nagants again. But if you love antique weapons, it would be a great choice if you can find a weapon with the honorable engraving.

According to wikipedia the mosin nagant is still in use. And there's nothing wrong with the mosin nagant, except for their hard to find caliber. The SV-98 is more modern, but the mosin has yet to be retired.

Isaac wrote:TC, go shoot an AK in full auto. You're gonna hit everything. It's fun.

Yeah, but it would burn through ammo like crazy, the muzzle lift would fill the air with a lead rain and it would still not hit the broadside of barn in most cases. When shooting a gun, accuracy counts. I guess the only redeeming value of an AK is that it's machined so loosely that it can get dirty and wet and still fire.