DescentBB

sigma wrote:Let's do a little experiment concerning the transmission of information at a distance.
Now I sent to all participants of the forum a mental message. It's interesting, you feel it? If so, tell me, what I told you.

I just got a boner.

woodchip wrote:

sigma wrote:Let's do a little experiment concerning the transmission of information at a distance.
Now I sent to all participants of the forum a mental message. It's interesting, you feel it? If so, tell me, what I told you.

I just got a boner.

wow, entirely too much info. Have some concern for those of us about to eat lunch before those sorts of visuals.

Hmmm. The experiment showed a negative result... Maybe it's because I sent you my thoughts in Russian?... But I still believe that telepathy exists.
I gave you a mental message, which translates into English as "God bless you"

likely, Sigma, is the issue that your Russian handlers intercepted and changed your message in the interest of maintaining the narrative!

Well, not just ours...
By the way, a good idea. It can be. Since both NATO and Russia use powerful military radio, GPS, TV and other frequency signals suppressors. I am very concerned that, in response to the transfer of the US armed forces and NATO military exercises in the Baltic States, Russia is now organizing a line of defense, throwing in the western and southern border of a large number of Russian aviation and strategic nuclear missiles. Nobody wants it, but it seems it's inevitable. Although ★■◆● on it. America itself wants us to punish her. While the European Union has repeatedly asked the US not to turn the gas crisis in Ukraine in military confrontation between Russia and the United States.

no one here really gives a comparative damn about the Ukraine, compared to ISIS, Israel, and domestic stuff. Really, we don't. Sure, we have some news coverage, and more can be readily found in the European press. Suffice it to say, no one is mentioning war with you all, the only ones really building up forces is Russia, and I strongly suspect much of what you hear is quite planned to keep you and your countrymen from wondering if your economy is in free-fall.

All the gods are already dead. I just want to understand who is worshiped by people of faith? the graves of their ancestors? For me, the holy grave - the grave of my mother. Not Jesus Christ.
And why, when God created the heaven on earth for Adam and Eve, he also created hell for them?

sigma wrote:...it seems it's inevitable. Although ★■◆● on it. America itself wants us to punish her.

Sigma, I hate to echo what slick said, but no one in the US gives a ★■◆● about problems in the Ukraine. If there is a NATO build-up it is to stop Russia from annexing more land that doesn't belong to you. Tell your leaders to come up with a diplomatic solution and you can stop worrying about us.

vision wrote:

sigma wrote:...it seems it's inevitable. Although **** on it. America itself wants us to punish her.

Sigma, I hate to echo what slick said, but no one in the US gives a **** about problems in the Ukraine. If there is a NATO build-up it is to stop Russia from annexing more land that doesn't belong to you. Tell your leaders to come up with a diplomatic solution and you can stop worrying about us.

US is an aggressive brainless bastard who threatens the whole world. If tomorrow the US will disappear from the face of the planet I don’t give a damn. But I will be sincerely sorry for all Americans, which in no way to blame.

Sigma... If America gets involved in an armed conflict with Russia, you can be sure Canada and the UK would be there aswell.

and, I'll tell you what won't 'be there' when the dust settles........ Russia, one can only hope, has SOMEONE overseeing that sort of decision with the good sense to do that calculation first.

Actually, if that happens, neither country will survive. That's why nuclear a war must never be fought and why most true warriors would never start one. There would be NO VICTORS and everyone knows that you don't fight a war you can never hope to win.

No one said anything about nuclear.

Oh the implication was there on sigma's side of the argument. In any conventional war, we and our allies would probably prevail over Russia, or at least cause them a lot of grief, because we have the technological advantage at the moment. But somehow I don't think Putin would like to lose any conflict with the U.S. and their allies. Besides, he's already thought about using nukes when they did their little Crimea invasion and if he's thought about it once, he'll think about it again. That's the problem with nukes. Everyone wants them as deterrents to war, but sometimes, someone with an ego or mental illness will blink and let them loose anyway, damned be the consequences.

http://time.com/3745522/vladimir-putin- ... a-ukraine/

Ferno wrote:No one said anything about nuclear.

you really think they'd wish a conventional ground war with their 20 year old technology?

callmeslick wrote:

Ferno wrote:No one said anything about nuclear.

you really think they'd wish a conventional ground war with their 20 year old technology?

So far they are succeeding

against NATO? You have some secret info, or still working on that boner that Sigma gave you?

callmeslick wrote:against NATO? You have some secret info, or still working on that boner that Sigma gave you?

I think his point is they are fighting and gaining ground and the NATO protectorate is losing.

Ukraine is a member of NATO?

callmeslick wrote:you really think they'd wish a conventional ground war with their 20 year old technology?

I learned along my travels that most of us have no idea what they would think. we can make (barely) educated guesses, though.

vision wrote:

sigma wrote:...it seems it's inevitable. Although **** on it. America itself wants us to punish her.

Sigma, I hate to echo what slick said, but no one in the US gives a **** about problems in the Ukraine. If there is a NATO build-up it is to stop Russia from annexing more land that doesn't belong to you. Tell your leaders to come up with a diplomatic solution and you can stop worrying about us.

P r i n c i p l e s P l e a s e?

In your opinion, this is a diplomatic solution to the problem?

Maier's article, entitled "Military Maneuvers: Equal Rights for All?" asks how the US would react if Russia conducted military exercises near Florida: "Imagine if Russia and China, together with Cuba and Venezuela, were to hold military maneuvers…directly in the Gulf of Mexico, right in the United States' backyard. Imagine the outcry in Washington, the massive media smear campaign that would unfold in the face of this 'indescribable military provocation'. One can only imagine…"

Then it will be too late to protest...

It defies my understanding why the US seeks and finds itself a threats to itself. The US has little internal problems to add another big headache from Russia? Instead of spending money from the budget to improve the lives of Americans, the U.S. government is doing everything possible to expose the real threat to even the existence of Americans. It seems that the US political elite regularly consume cocaine