Page 2 of 2
Re: While you were looking in the wrong direction
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 12:55 pm
by Tunnelcat
Spidey wrote:I grasp the idea that he won’t get money from Democrats, but I can’t rule out his appeal to independents.
Why not? Trump has aided Democratic interests in the past and he's widely acknowledged as the one who made it possible for a liberal victory in 2006 and the subsequent creation of Obamacare. He might just pick up a few Dems who dislike both Hillary and Sanders.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... story.html
Re: While you were looking in the wrong direction
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:00 pm
by Spidey
Was talking about Webb...try to keep up.
Re: While you were looking in the wrong direction
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 7:23 pm
by woodchip
National poll...Sanders 39%, Hillary 43%. Looks like Hillary is dropping like a stone in standings compared to where she once was against Bernie.
Re: While you were looking in the wrong direction
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 7:35 pm
by callmeslick
don't say we didn't try to warn you, woody. Go back and look at Obama's trajectory and you might find Bernie's similar. Also, pertinent to your original point, Webb isn't happening, but Bloomberg IS threatening to enter, but ONLY if Hillary and Trump are the nominees. Now, that would be interesting.
Re: While you were looking in the wrong direction
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 7:38 pm
by callmeslick
follow the green and purple lines:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls ... n-191.html
Hillary is starting to look like the racehorse with decent bloodlines and early speed that dies in the stretch every time.(Woody will have a ball, no doubt, that I am stating that Ms Clinton resembles a horse).
Re: While you were looking in the wrong direction
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 7:25 am
by woodchip
callmeslick wrote: (Woody will have a ball, no doubt, that I am stating that Ms Clinton resembles a horse).
A nag?
