Re: well, the traffic WAS bad
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2016 5:23 am
so, granting time, but not using the office to grant one proven favor is somehow unheard of?
Page 2 of 2
Re: well, the traffic WAS bad
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2016 7:47 am
Clutching at straws again? Granting time is the favor. As to anything else we would need a fly on the wall to know what Hillary agreed to. Granting a donor some specific request is not unheard of either. So lets stop with the "proven" BS.
Re: well, the traffic WAS bad
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2016 11:18 am
Can you describe the problem?
Re: well, the traffic WAS bad
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2016 6:52 pm
Lol, we all we all know money rules the world, but when we actually see a small sign of it, we go into denial mode.
(unless it's the "other guys"
)
(unless it's the "other guys"
)