Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 10:45 am
Heh, its ugly, it might look better if she had a tan.
It's the fact that she's a teenager. Not the fact that its a half nude girl.Dedman wrote:You think enjoying the sight of a nearly naked female body makes you a pervert? Dude, please, seek help quickly.Lobber wrote:Then my second thought was, wait, people will think I'm a pervert.
Founded by the prudes for the prudesFerno wrote:you guys are prudes..
What's wrong with her being a teenager? If as you originally assented, you wished you were back in high school, you would also be a teenager. If you were both teenagers and you thought "GIGGITY GIGGITY. ALRIIIIGHTâ?Lobber wrote:It's the fact that she's a teenager. Not the fact that its a half nude girl.Dedman wrote:You think enjoying the sight of a nearly naked female body makes you a pervert? Dude, please, seek help quickly.Lobber wrote:Then my second thought was, wait, people will think I'm a pervert.
Canuck wrote:There isn't even $20.00 of fabric in that dress.
I'd set up a trampoline and ask the models to start jumping
For real. Its not like its going to matter anyways since it won't stay on for longer than a few hours at the most. Besides, with a dress like that, more than likely she'll get cold...which means she'll want to snuggle up.Ferno wrote:you guys are prudes..
I think her tits are lop-sided.punisher wrote:I think it's ugly.