Page 2 of 3

Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2004 5:20 pm
by FireFox
Here is my Desktop for the time being.

Image

Click on Image for 1600x1200

Posted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 1:44 pm
by Defender
Mine atm:

Image

Posted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 3:37 pm
by JMEaT
Heh! Where's the one without the leaves? :D

Posted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 4:25 pm
by Beowulf
...woot, cgi boobs :roll:

Posted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 11:32 pm
by Nitrofox125
DC Do you have a larger version of that wallpaper?

Nitrofox

Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 7:55 pm
by DCrazy
Yes I do, Nitro... a 1600x1200 BMP. :)

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2004 1:24 am
by BfDiDDy
Image

Image

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2004 7:09 am
by Scorch
dude, that's creepy. I would not be able to work with that thing staring at me ;)

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2004 9:45 pm
by Vertigo 99
dood he took osx and wxp and smashed them together.

I'm guessing that's WXP tho, but with a dock program?

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2004 11:29 pm
by BfDiDDy
right

Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2004 9:44 am
by Tricord
I'm still using the Spacial Distortions Blue background wich someone posted in the last desktop thread I checked uh, two years ago.

Desktop...

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 12:21 pm
by Lothar
My desktop

Image

(Yet another reason to allow HTML: I know how to force image resize using HTML img tags. Does UBB support that?)

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 12:33 pm
by Drakona
Image

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 12:56 pm
by Nitrofox125
I'm using this one that I just made on one of my computer:

[url="http://www.fragwerkz.com/index.php?page ... =wallpaper"]Image[/url/

Re: Desktop...

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 1:44 pm
by Tetrad
Lothar wrote:(Yet another reason to allow HTML: I know how to force image resize using HTML img tags. Does UBB support that?)
No, but why would you want to do that when you can physically resize the image and achieve both higher quality and smaller filesize?

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 2:35 pm
by Tyranny
Perhaps because HTML is much more convenient for those of us that know it like the back of our hands. I didn't see an abundance of people abusing the ability to use HTML on the old board to warrant it being shut off on the new one anyways.

on Topic, I also have that wallpaper BF posted though I rarely use it.

Desktops

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 6:27 pm
by Lothar
tet, how would I get a 'higher quality' image by shrinking what I currently have? I'm not familiar with any form of compression that increases data content.

Re: Desktops

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 7:55 pm
by Tetrad
Lothar wrote:tet, how would I get a 'higher quality' image by shrinking what I currently have? I'm not familiar with any form of compression that increases data content.
Shrinking the image via width and height commands typically does a pixel resize, whereas you can do much higher quality resizes with a graphics program. It's not about compression.

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 8:11 pm
by Jon the Great
BfDiDDy, where'd you get that dock program? It looks awesome. :D

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 8:12 pm
by Kyouryuu
I took it myself. :D

Image

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 11:39 am
by STRESSTEST
Image

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 7:23 pm
by Duper
Image


What can I say... I like Yellow.

;) "Pika Pika!"

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 11:17 pm
by Defender
That is most disturbing.

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:32 am
by STRESSTEST
so basicly, you are picking up where gayvote left off?

Re: Desktop...

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:16 pm
by MD-2389
Lothar wrote:My desktop

*image here*

(Yet another reason to allow HTML: I know how to force image resize using HTML img tags. Does UBB support that?)
Actually, there is a vBulletin mod on the Hard Light forums that basically shrinks down the image to a given resolution, and all you have to do is type in [sized]image here[/sized] and it'd do it for you. You could also just post a thumbnail and link to the full-size image. Thats what, a 3 second job in any decent image editor? ;) It shouldn't be that hard to port to phpBB, if there isn't a mod already out that does this.

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 3:08 pm
by JMEaT
Duper... c'mon man... Changing teams=teh no.

bah

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 6:41 pm
by Lothar
MD -- I posted this first, and then you posted the thing I made the "3-second job" comment about. You didn't get my back here, so I figured, why get your back over there?

And yes, a mod like that would be nice -- but it's still nonstandard code.

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:03 pm
by Asrale
Change cometh - a new daily binge from NFS4. And for fun, Real-Life, NFS-style! Hahaha! :P (taken on the Colorado U.S. 36 highway)

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:05 pm
by Defender
HTML's off :P

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:07 pm
by Asrale
Yeah I just noticed, d'oh! ;)

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:15 pm
by Skyalmian
Image

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 7:35 pm
by Duper
JMEaT wrote:Changing teams=teh no.

what does THAT mean?

btw Arch.. sweet pix!

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 7:43 pm
by CDN_Merlin

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 8:09 pm
by Vertigo 99
JMEaT wrote:Duper... c'mon man... Changing teams=teh no.
lmfao

Re: bah

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 9:25 pm
by MD-2389
Lothar wrote:MD -- I posted this first, and then you posted the thing I made the "3-second job" comment about. You didn't get my back here, so I figured, why get your back over there?
Relax man, I'm just teasing you. ;)

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 9:45 pm
by kurupt
are we allowed to post tasteful images of women's breasts? i dont know if mine is allowed :(

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 9:53 pm
by Duper
put up a link with a warning. That's legit. It's a nice desktop really.

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 10:26 pm
by MD-2389
kurupt wrote:are we allowed to post tasteful images of women's breasts? i dont know if mine is allowed :(
Honestly, as long as you put up a warning, I personally don't mind if you link to it, but I'd ask Xciter about that first.

Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 10:36 pm
by kurupt

Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2004 4:29 am
by kurupt
edit bump