Page 3 of 3
Re:
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:15 am
by Blaze
Foil wrote:Guys, come on.
If you object to the 9/11 coverage, get over it.
If you think less of someone for objecting, get over it.
Get over it?? Why should anyone "get over" their convictions? This would only make sense if their objection was unjustified. I can understand if you want people who don't like the 9/11 coverage to post elsewhere, but asking them to accept false information is just silly.
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:50 am
by BUBBALOU
I'm not going to read the sh!t that's posted about 911 on this board by these noobz and eurotrash and lack of moderation here. Basically as soon as I stepped across "null0010" I was done
null0010 wrote:Personally, I think we need to get over it and stop obsessing about it. I'm tired of hearing stories of how tragic and sad it was that 3,000 Americans died in one day. It's so self-centered;
Top Gun wrote:null0010 wrote:I'm Trolling
Without trying to downplay how horrific what happened nine years ago today was, I sort of agree with this sentiment.
To anyone who shares this "Kids" umbilical view of the world including you "TopGun" I recommend you visit this
Page
You were not there, so we do not appreciate your input nor your opinions, KTHXBYE
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:53 am
by Heretic
LOL Bubbalou I don't share their view but went there any way.
Re:
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:58 am
by BUBBALOU
Heretic wrote:LOL Bubbalou I don't share their view but went there any way.
You like watermelon?
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:20 am
by Heretic
Only with chicken.
Re:
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:07 am
by null0010
BUBBALOU wrote:You were not there, so we do not appreciate your input nor your opinions, KTHXBYE
Just a little FYI, I
was in New York at the time, and one of my family members was saved from certain death by mere chance.
However, I didn't think that was particularly relevant to the topic at hand, because it's about 9/11 media coverage, not self-serving jingoistic bragging rights.
Re:
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:18 am
by Foil
Blaze wrote:Get over it?? Why should anyone "get over" their convictions?
I never asked anyone to get over their convictions.
I was telling people to "get over" the fact that not everyone shares their feelings on the matter.
In other words, you can read my post as:
Foil (new emphasis added) wrote:If you object to the 9/11 coverage, get over it. [Some people want to see it, even if you don't.]
If you think less of someone for objecting, get over it. [Some people don't want to see it, even if you think they should.]
Re:
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:57 pm
by BUBBALOU
null0010 wrote:Just a little FYI, I am Backpedaling as best I can.
Whatever kid@!
Re:
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 4:11 pm
by null0010
BUBBALOU wrote:null0010 wrote:Just a little FYI, I am Backpedaling as best I can.
Whatever kid@!
And I see you're plugging your ears and screaming as best
you can.
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 4:34 pm
by Heretic
null0010 wrote:Just because we disagree on media coverage doesn't mean you have to leap on every little thing in a conversation.
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:41 pm
by Isaac
Nah, that was last week.
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:44 pm
by AlphaDoG
Leap on post count++
Oh and yea this thread is like cotton washed too many times, thread bare.
Re:
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:56 pm
by Ferno
null0010 wrote:And I see you're plugging your ears and screaming as best you can.
Don't worry about him. he's just a sheep in wolf's clothing.