DescentBB

callmeslick wrote:

Will Robinson wrote:

callmeslick wrote:...
Historically, that has proven very dangerous, from the French and Russian revolutions on forward.


And, to conclude my thought, all that history will render the 'firearm' useless, unless it is to bring upon myself a less painful end.

What the heck do you think they waged those revolutions with?

superior numbers, first and foremost.

I suggest you search Japanese banzai attacks against American machine gun post and you may want to revise your thinking. The whole guerrilla warfare doctine is another case in point showing numbers may mean nothing.

woodchip wrote:callmeslick
"all unions? All the time? Or, even a lot of the time? I'd sort of be interested in what proof you have of this."

Might want to take a look here and see a breakdown:

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php

I think you will see most if not all unions donating to the dems.

and likewise, Goldman Sachs, Disney, AT and T, etc. Given the timeframe involved, yes, the Unions would give to the Dems(post Reagan), for the exact reason I stated above. You support those who aren't trying to do you in. What does that prove, regarding thugs and the rest of the charges you made?

woodchip wrote:

callmeslick wrote:...
Historically, that has proven very dangerous, from the French and Russian revolutions on forward.


And, to conclude my thought, all that history will render the 'firearm' useless, unless it is to bring upon myself a less painful end.

What the heck do you think they waged those revolutions with?

now, read the parts of our exchange in red and explain how bringing up the examples of Banzai attacks has any relevance to popular revolutions. I, for one, am scratching my head.