Page 3 of 3

Re: Pope Borgia

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 8:28 am
by woodchip
In my best Darth Vader voice, "The desperation is strong in this one"

Re: Pope Borgia

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 10:12 am
by callmeslick
here's a political blogger from the left who expounds upon my Michael Moore observations, and some other things we've touched on here:

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2 ... ican-party

Re: Pope Borgia

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 11:31 am
by Lothar
callmeslick wrote:NO, it is nothing like the Dems in 2002, 2006 or any other date you'd care to cite.
I think you're too caught up in the "identical" thing that I never argued.

But hey, at this point we're just making the same assertions over and over again. You assert that the situations are "nothing" alike, and that the Republican party is going to collapse. I assert that the situations have some similarities, and that the Republican party will find its way, and will do it by the next midterms if not sooner.

If you have nothing new to say, and I have nothing new to say, let's stop wasting each others' time.

Re: Pope Borgia

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 11:32 am
by callmeslick
Lothar wrote:
callmeslick wrote:NO, it is nothing like the Dems in 2002, 2006 or any other date you'd care to cite.
I think you're too caught up in the "identical" thing that I never argued.

But hey, at this point we're just making the same assertions over and over again. You assert that the situations are "nothing" alike, and that the Republican party is going to collapse. I assert that the situations have some similarities, and that the Republican party will find its way, and will do it by the next midterms if not sooner.

If you have nothing new to say, and I have nothing new to say, let's stop wasting each others' time.
that's why I left it with the blog observations above. I'm done for now.