Your contract with the government.
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:27 am
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:52 pm
Now that's interesting. Thanks.
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:16 pm
Printing for later!
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 3:50 pm
Hey Sky, it's nice to know that someone thinks of me.
Thanks for posting that! I have actually been aware of this for awhile and gave it a hard look-over back in the early 90's. Me and a friend spent about a year learning the ins and outs of our(and their) contractual obligation. The problem we faced was that the benefits of withdrawling does not outweigh the risk of running into trouble(being looked at through a microscope) by drawing attention to yourself.
I'm not in any way discrediting the validity of the paper, it's 100% true.I just don't think there's a large enough value compared to thr risks involved.
I'm suprised that you posted such a underground type paper on the DBB. I'm not a bit surprised at the lack of responses, though.
wastmore@pacbell.net
E-mail me, we can yap a bit.
Thanks for posting that! I have actually been aware of this for awhile and gave it a hard look-over back in the early 90's. Me and a friend spent about a year learning the ins and outs of our(and their) contractual obligation. The problem we faced was that the benefits of withdrawling does not outweigh the risk of running into trouble(being looked at through a microscope) by drawing attention to yourself.
I'm not in any way discrediting the validity of the paper, it's 100% true.I just don't think there's a large enough value compared to thr risks involved.
I'm suprised that you posted such a underground type paper on the DBB. I'm not a bit surprised at the lack of responses, though.
wastmore@pacbell.net
E-mail me, we can yap a bit.
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:27 pm
Interesting, though irrelevant to me
*Shadowfury333 looks south and waves
However, I'm curious at to whether or not Canada has a similar provision, or if we up here are in fact truly stuck.
*Shadowfury333 looks south and waves
However, I'm curious at to whether or not Canada has a similar provision, or if we up here are in fact truly stuck.
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 5:43 pm
I looked into it a bit more and I'm questioning whether the paper is actually factual. Here's an alternate view on some of the points it makes...
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 9:58 pm
Vast conspiracy theories generally require too many people to cooperate in a way that is highly unlikely.
\"Two people can keep a secret only when one of them is dead.\" - Benjamin Franklin
\"Two people can keep a secret only when one of them is dead.\" - Benjamin Franklin
Re:
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 12:57 am
What is Canada? Oh, you must mean Canadia, the United States' northern resource area located north of the northern borders of Washington, Montana, North Dakota, Minnnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, Vermont, and Maine and south of the artic circle.Shadowfury333 wrote:However, I'm curious at to whether or not Canada has a similar provision, or if we up here are in fact truly stuck.
Yeah, you're screwed too.
Re: Your contract with the government.
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:35 pm
This deserves more then a "word". I have been aware of it also, just never saw this site before that explains it so clearly!Skyalmian wrote:I've had a copy of this for about a year now and decided to read it again yesterday -- only to marvel at the method by which the Constitutional Republic, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights have not been in use or adhered to whatsoever for the last 73 years.
This post is more for B- than anyone else.
Short summary (with some additional information not covered in there added in): by simply being born, you entered into the quasi-contract (private law, agreed to simply by your silence) that is the 14th Amendment Trust with a corporation created in England in 1871 called "THE UNITED STATES" and have been, for your entire life, operating outside of the Constitutional Republic, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, and instead in the Legislative Democracy that's operated by Roman civil law where you have no rights, no ability to own any property whatsoever (you have held and will hold everything in equity only), and are compelled by the contract you are in to pay the debt for your entire life. There is a way to exit this contract to be a sovereign individual, but almost no one knows that it exists. No one will ever gain their rights or property unless they leave the 14th Amendment contract.
Everyone has been wondering for decades what is wrong with this country, its government, and its courts, and this sufficiently explains it.
The U.S.A. the Republic: Is the House That No One Lives In
Re:
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:34 pm
I was under the impression that G. Gordon Liddy said this, after holding his hand over a candle, to the poinbt where he burned himself quite seriously in order to show it wouldn't be him that talked. I could be wrong though...Kilarin wrote:"Two people can keep a secret only when one of them is dead." - Benjamin Franklin
.....time....passes....
Yep, I was wrong.
Thanks!
