that history channel piece was very biased, and did a great job of making anyone who questions what happened that day look like a nut....as it was supposed too.
I cant believe you guys eather have very bad memories or so want your lives to go on like normal that your willing to believe any lie...
Lets take the steel didnt melt on for size. I completely agree that it was impossable for jet fuel and the deseil fule(in building 7) to competly melt the steel causing the collapse... but how do you explane this...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 8051631094
eye witness accounts from firemen cleaning up-
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 3573302287
i could post clips like this all day, there are plenty of PBS documentaries from the cleanup CLEARLY showing melted steel. Which, by the way, was all the way to the basement of all 3 buildings. There was not enought fuel present to account for all this melted steel, not by a long shot.
As for the fires in the buildings -
A fireman did make it up to the 78th floor of building 2(the first to collapse) right before it collapsed.... he said the fires were almost out, listen to the tapes, you can hear for yourself.
the fires in building 7 were not that bad at all, there are plenty of pictures
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... &plindex=0
Funny thing in all this, no one talks about buildings 3,4,5 and 6.... these buildings had fires in them from top to bottom... and chunks of wtc 1 and 2 crush them causing parts to collapse, but these buildings had to be taken down durning the cleanup since they didnt collapse completly...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... &plindex=0
compare the damage and fires these buildings withstood with that of building 7... you should be starting to say hmmmm by now if there is any grey matter in that skull.
Also notice the thermal scans of the wtc complex, hot spots are found only under 1,2, and 7.... even though buildings 3-6 burned from top to bottom. Why is that?
Here is a clip talking about the fact that buildings 4 5 and 6 had to be taken down.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... &plindex=0
So here is the big question, If you have bothered to listen to the firefighters audio tapes, you've heard them say the fires are almost out just before the collapse, and now you've seen that the steel did in fact melt, Just how did it happen??? Last i checked, steel dont just spontaniously melt without any help....
The whole idea of exploseves being used actually came from the firefighters... from the oral testomonies which is in the official report, over 500 people onsite when the collapse happened were interviewed, Over 130 of them reported hearing or even seeing the demolition wave. why do we dismiss such evidence so quickly...
here are 2 such quotes and who said them. check them out, they are legit.
Karin Deshore -- Captain (E.M.S.) Somewhere around the middle of the World Trade Center, there was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just one flash. Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building.
Stephen Gregory -- Assistant Commissioner (F.D.N.Y.) We both for whatever reason -- again, I don't know how valid this is with everything that was going on at that particular point in time, but for some reason I thought that when I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, that I saw low-level flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I thought -- at that time I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down.
...
[It was at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw.
...
He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did you see flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them too.
...
I know about the explosion on the upper floors. This was like at eye level. I didn't have to go like this. Because I was looking this way. I'm not going to say it was on the first floor or the second floor, but somewhere in that area I saw to me what appeared to be flashes.
So do we dismiss what the people who were there saw? why was this never followed up on? These buildings collapsed, the first concrete reinforced steel buildings and no investigation, expecially building 7, since it fell by fire alone....By fire code, there was supposed to be and investigation of the rubble so future buildings could correct the \"mistakes\" made in the construction of these buildings. Funny thing here is the flaw seems to have only existed in buildings 1,2 and 7. If you remember way back, the familys of the firefighters suied Rudy G. to force him to stop shipping the cleaned up rubble overseas and investigate and test for why these buildings collapsed. thier case was never granted, all debris were promptly cleaned up and all evidence destroyed....
As you listen to the firefighters audio from that day, you will also notice how many radio in about bombs going off(this is most likey why these tapes were held from the public for so long)
Heck, the fellow who ran the control center for building 7 went on record stating that he had to be rescued from building 7 as the lobby was destroyed after the first plane hit. the firefighters had to cut a hole to let him and several other out as the lobby was so damaged, and this was before the second plane hit and nothing had hit building 7 at all!!!!
As far as why would the wtc complex get destroyed and the pentagon get hit instad of using nerve gas? it was never just about the body count, they were after money and destroying records for criminals who toed the line. There were quite a few hi profile criminals who got get out of jail free cards when building 7 went down. not to mention the fbi and finicial records stored in the section of the pentagon that were destroyed. The day before the pentagon got hit, they announced that over $400 billion was missing... sadly the records were moved to that section of the pentagon that was under renovation... this on top of the millions said to have been funneled throug computers starting one hour before collapse, and $160 billion in gold missing from building 4's vaults, $230 million was recovered from armored cars parked by building 5 though......
History is full of conspiracys, sadly we never pay any attention to them till it's too late. the romans never took Julius Cezr's power grabs seriously till he abolished the republic and became emperor...the same in recent times with Germany.
Read the book, They Thought They were Free, The Germans. It's a great book outlineing how the educated people of Germany let Hitler slowly grab power and do everthing that he did... it's very eye opening....
Sadly enough this wont be over till the US is united with Canada with a European Union Style government ruling over both counrties....
I KNEW that was going to get mentioned.
This kind of linkage is more happenstance than circumstantial.