DescentBB

woodchip wrote:You are thinking of Iraq and Syria.

Urban Survival wrote:One Last [Future] Jack for the Road

Some good news for a change...although just how good we don't know. It started with a strange and very short phone call from an unidentified source in Europe who said he was with an agency that is in a place to know what's going on with the advance planning for the possible attack on Iran by Israel. The caller informed us that because the ALTA/Shape of Things to Come reports run 'above chance' in their outcomes, and since some .mil types read them as soon as release, the folks in attack contingency planning have gone into much deeper target backgrounding than usual on secondary and tertiary targets. That was it. A very short phone call and the caller hung up - no other details. A foreign country code and a 'no such number' beyond that.

Whether the call is 'legit', or not, we certainly hope it is and that advance planning does turn up the 'risk' in a tertiary target which was outlined for the apparent October 25th (+/- a few days) attack date.

Here's where it gets interesting - and I'm working on a new 'George Theorem' about how the nature of time works. We already know (Cliff generously called the George Theorem ) that when we have multiple events that 'line up' ( as in the Redwood City quake in September of '04) it can linguistically 'mask' another event which would have similar descriptor sets, but which is further along apparent time as was the Banda Aceh quake in December 2004 when we viewed both as a since meta data set from the August 2004 perspective.

My supposition now is that when we have descriptors now that go to the idea of 'ill winds' circling the earth '9 times' after late October, that the cause may drift away from aftermath of an attack on Iran and instead may weight heavily to something else that's 'ill' - like the resurgence of novel/swine flu that's expected in that timeframe as well.

It's a variant of the problem we noted in the data prior to the Columbia space shuttle event where we had linguistics that while fulfilled by a space ship, could just have easily have been fulfilled by a maritime accident of the more conventional sort. The 'gem of the ocean' linguistic while fulfilled by the Columbia disaster, might have also been fulfilled by a sinking of a large passenger liner - which obviously didn't happen.

We've been experimenting to see whether future events are, in this sense, malleable. In other words, can the outcome be changed?

woodchip wrote:Consider that diplomacy has not worked for the last x number of years, why should Israel wait?

Duper wrote:

woodchip wrote:You are thinking of Iraq and Syria.

Perhaps, I'll look into it. thx

Will Robinson wrote: The United States has been using Israel as a proxy military to keep the post revolution Iranians and the radical Arabs under the threat of military strike.

Duper wrote:

Will Robinson wrote: The United States has been using Israel as a proxy military to keep the post revolution Iranians and the radical Arabs under the threat of military strike.

I'm going to dissagree with that. (while the prior statement is absolutely true) Israel is a free state; free in the sense they have made their own military decisions. We have been thier allies and have helped them and scolded them for this that or the other thing, but they are not beneath thumbing thier noses at us. (and many times rightly so.)