So we are finally starting to see how the liberal controlled Junta will start controlling the message. Funny, one would thing \"Liberal\" meant having access to differing viewpoints\"
\"The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is blocking certain websites from the federal agency's computers, including halting access by staffers to any Internet pages that contain a \"controversial opinion,\" according to an internal email obtained by CBS News.\"
C & C
Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250
- Will Robinson
- DBB Grand Master
- Posts: 10136
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 3:01 am
How much do you want to bet the definition of \"controversial opinion\" is borrowed from the administrations plan to shut down talk radio?
The current ruling democrat leadership is so much closer to being a fascist orginazation than a liberal or democratic one that it should have the free press screaming from ever corner....except most of them are card carrying members so they don't.
The current ruling democrat leadership is so much closer to being a fascist orginazation than a liberal or democratic one that it should have the free press screaming from ever corner....except most of them are card carrying members so they don't.
- Kilarin
- DBB Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 2403
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 2:01 am
- Location: South of Ft. Worth Texas
I wouldn't doubt it. BUT, I would ALSO be willing to bet that when the administration changes hand, the conservatives will keep the rule and just change the definition of a "controversial opinion"Will Robinson wrote:How much do you want to bet the definition of "controversial opinion" is borrowed from the administrations plan to shut down talk radio?
We MAY be reading malice into a situation that does not deserve it. Their goal is probably similar to the second goal of any corporation trying to censor internet access by it's employees at work. The first goal is always to try and get some actual WORK out of the employees. The second is that they are afraid that someone will be offended by something they see on a co-workers screen. That results in expensive law-suits which the company would just as soon avoid.
- CUDA
- DBB Master
- Posts: 6482
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon
there is a HUGE difference in what a Privately owned Company does and a Government mandate in relation to the 1st amendment.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
― Theodore Roosevelt
― Theodore Roosevelt
While I can understand blocking porn and gaming sites, opinion sites may very well be legitimate sites to visit for employees at a national security organization to visit...unless the higher ups don't want their employees to receive information different from the govt. cant. Kinda stupid tho because said employees will then go home and visit those sites just because they can't at work.