DescentBB

A coalition of Mexican mayors has asked the United States to stop deporting illegal immigrants who have been convicted of serious crimes in the U.S. to Mexican border cities, saying the deportations are contributing to Mexican border violence

Whoda thunk that sending MEXICANS that have commited serious crimes back to MEXICO would cause crime to rise in MEXICO

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/09/28/me ... criminals/

It's pretty stupid of us; anyone we drop off can just cross back into the U.S.A., especially to the violent and legally challenged vato. The death penalty is logical in this case, if we can make it cheaper...

I didn't think you could turn it up any higher it's already on eleven.

::update::: What am I saying!? Correction: It's worth the cost if it means closing that loop-hole....or at least that part.

Isaac wrote:It's pretty stupid of us; anyone we drop off can just cross back into the U.S.A., especially to the violent and legally challenged vato. The death penalty is logical in this case, if we can make it cheaper...

Not if we support Arizona, and the other border states instead of crying about the poor illegals rights.

x2

edit:
I mean I do care about anyone who suffers, because I'm such a sweet guy. But that law deserves to be tested. States take risks and test laws to see what benefits come out. I had trouble finding jobs recently. Maybe my chances would have been better had the competition been lighter. Wages might even increase. I am of Mexican descent and I don't see how the Arizona law will hurt me; the cops already profile; they admit it. I'm also a good driver and never worry about being pulled over and I always have several forms of ID on me. Of course I'm going to remain a Democrat because the Republican party doesn't want a Neutral Net... (edit--removed part)

We need to actually step up the deportation and send more of the illegals back to their country. Proper US immigration is time consuming but it is easy to do. Instead we have thousands of people living off of my taxes and driving 20 miles an hour below the speed limit because they don't have a DL.

Isaac wrote:x2

edit:
I mean I do care about anyone who suffers, because I'm such a sweet guy. But that law deserves to be tested. States take risks and test laws to see what benefits come out. I had trouble finding jobs recently. Maybe my chances would have been better had the competition been lighter. Wages might even increase. I am of Mexican descent and I don't see how the Arizona law will hurt me; the cops already profile; they admit it. I'm also a good driver and never worry about being pulled over and I always have several forms of ID on me. Of course I'm going to remain a Democrat because the Republican party doesn't want a Neutral Net... #%^&ing idiots.

Isaac, I am of the "right" and I see your right as an American Citizen to exist as an essential. Speaking on Net Neutrality, again I agree. The internet should and can be kept free. The "right" doesn't oppose Net Neutrality, in fact we are in agreement that information MUST be kept free. Truly, it is the left wingers that seek to destroy your right to the free flow of information.

AlphaDoG wrote:Truly, it is the left wingers that seek to destroy your right to the free flow of information.

I edited out a bit of emotion on my last post...

Yes, you are correct. There are some of those on the conservative side who are brushing against the grain when it comes to this off-topic issue. And yes, this administration has been ignoring the battle between the telecoms and FCC. ....anyway... must sleep..

Don't look to either party for leadership on the net neutrality issue, they are both sellouts before they are anything else.

Net neutrality wouldn't even be an issue at all if it wasn't for the lack of competition in the US market. It is the result of both parties allowing and actively supporting the monopolies and duopoly cartels that are trying to crush net neutrality in order to expand their control and profit in the first place. If you want the issue to actually come up and be moved towards a real solution you should assume anyone with a D or an R near their name is already compromised.

The \"left\" or \"right\" sides of the debate are just a farce drummed up by both parties, it pits both sides against the middle in order to keep any real reform movements from building up momentum.

You assume that \"left\" and \"right\" belong to a party.

I assume you are ignorant.

Are we even yet?

Don't pigeon hole me. As far as you know I might be main stream and STILL want REAL net neutrality.

I mean, don't get me wrong, but it's no surprise (taking everything into consideration) that crime is on the rise in Mexico ... and things are indeed a bit rough there at the moment already ... and yes, we all share a bit of blame for it.

TechPro wrote:..
... and yes, we all share a bit of blame for it.

If you mean because we buy their illegal drugs and hire from their smuggled labor pool I'm with you there but the corruption they call a government and all the crime it sustains and creates is not all because of their illegal exports, they have embraced their broken system from their beginning.

x2 Mexico can improve when it's the Mexican consensus. It is not.

AlphaDoG wrote:As far as you know I might be main stream and STILL want REAL net neutrality.

Well, yes. Anyone who understands what it really means will want a neutral Net. I do not think that's the main-stream way of thinking about this since those types continually get it wrong on tv.