Page 1 of 1
Hillary
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:27 am
by woodchip
Her opening statement is all about shutting the door after the horses escaped and nothing about why the door was open in the first place.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:56 am
by woodchip
So in contrast to what Ms Lamb said about there being enough money for security, like a good little politician, hillary is trying to spin that the foreign service dept had their budget cut and needs more money. So in her view Benghazi fault was because she didn't have enough money to give proper security to her embassy staff
Re: Hillary
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:16 am
by woodchip
Getting a little tired of all the accolades the Dems and others give Hillary when this should be a grilling session
Re: Hillary
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:33 am
by woodchip
So if the situation was so fluid and so much was going on, why was Ms Rice still spouting off about a video Hillary? Alas Hillary can only fake anger, bang the table and say she doesn't know.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:40 am
by CUDA
IMHO mistakes happen. find the problem correct it and move on. you'll never be able to stop every attack
My problem is with the intentional lies and deceit perpetuated by the White-house multiple times to cover up those mistakes
Re: Hillary
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:51 am
by woodchip
Finally McCains turn and he asks and says what needs to be said.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 12:14 am
by Will Robinson
woodchip wrote:Finally McCains turn and he asks and says what needs to be said.
Without an objective journalism force to take them to task ....well...'
What does it matter...'
Re: Hillary
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 1:57 am
by CobGobbler
'twas only four people gentlemen....so yeah...what does it matter? I think more than four died yesterday playing Parcheesi....just saying.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 6:26 am
by woodchip
20 children died at Sandy Hook, who cares what the reason was.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 6:46 am
by CUDA
well following Cob's line of thinking what does it matter?? twas only 20.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:01 am
by woodchip
CUDA wrote:well following Cob's line of thinking what does it matter?? twas only 20.
Ummm...that would be Hillarys line of thinking. Cob was just doing a bit of tongue in cheek sarcasm.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 8:10 pm
by callmeslick
Re: Hillary
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:11 pm
by Will Robinson
No, that sums up the outcome for some people. The ones who don't care about justice as long as their political team escapes trouble.
There is another part of the outcome that some people care about.
For example, there is a father and mother of Tyrone Woods who was killed in the attack. Hillary met with them when their sons body was returned to America.
Hillary was blaming their sons death on the filmmaker who made an anti-Islam video, telling them the administration
'would see that the film maker was punished'. That assertion was complete bullfeces. She knew full well that the film maker had nothing to do with Woods death.
Why she was still peddling that propaganda line at that date is anyone's guess.
It shouldn't have to be a guess though because she is a public servant who has the answers and refused to give them up.
She said, instead,
"what does it really matter?" with feigned indignation and even cited the event of attending Wood's body returning as one of the important things she was doing instead of having a care about investigating what happened! Deflection is an art form to her, in this case it was pretty circular rings of smoke blown up the Woods family's ass. Circular too, the way she both absolved herself of any blame and took credit for taking the blame all in one fell, inconsequential, swoop!
Those people aren't amused at the outcome of the hearing. And you shouldn't be either.
The true test, if you want to be honest, is, if it wasn't your Party dodging the blame, if had been a bunch of loathsome TeaParty types instead, you know you would be unhappy with the way they got away with it. So you shouldn't be happy that your Party did either. If you want to be honest about it.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:23 pm
by vision
Hillary rocks.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:31 pm
by CobGobbler
She is pretty badass indeed. She's like Sarah Palin, except Hillary is the opposite in every way and still relevant. This really, really was a glorious election. The beginning of Jesus' second term and the end of Palin....the best.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:45 pm
by callmeslick
personally, now that Fox hired Kucinich, I wanted them to team him up with Palin for a show.......that's just me, I guess.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:09 am
by woodchip
CobGobbler wrote:She is pretty badass indeed. She's like Sarah Palin, except Hillary is the opposite in every way and still relevant. This really, really was a glorious election. The beginning of Jesus' second term and the end of Palin....the best.
Always helps to have a adoring press on your side.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:55 pm
by vision
woodchip wrote:Always helps to have a adoring press on your side.
She earned that adoration.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 3:03 pm
by woodchip
Really? How so. The Turkey embassy was just attacked making that the eight one under dear Hillary's watch. The whole middle east is going up in flames and somehow you believe Hillary earned the presses love. Let me clue you in, she has a D after her name and that's all it takes for the press to love you.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:29 am
by vision
Please refresh my memory, I can't remember when the Middle East wasn't in flames.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 7:12 am
by callmeslick
If I recall, the year 1737 was pretty peaceful.....
Re: Hillary
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 4:31 pm
by Burlyman
I think we've seen 'Billary' before.
Re: Hillary
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:51 pm
by Ferno
Burlyman wrote:I think we've seen 'Billary' before.