DescentBB

Posted: **Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:25 pm**

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/03/07/ok ... latestnews

A search of two Oklahoma women who were sitting in a vehicle outside a closed restaurant turned bizarre when police discovered that one of them was concealing a loaded gun – inside her private parts................

During the book-in, a female officer said she noticed “something strange” sticking out from inside Harris’ body, KFOR reports.

Court records say the “wooden and metal item,” which was a revolver, was “sticking out from her vagina area.”

Posted: **Thu Mar 07, 2013 7:16 pm**

She's not a girl who misses much
Do do do do do do- oh yeah!

Happiness is a warm gun
when I hold you in my arms
and I feel my finger on your trigger
I know no body can do me no harm
because
Happiness is a warm gun

Posted: **Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:31 am**

...well then...that gives a whole new meaning to "gun control," I guess.

Posted: **Fri Mar 08, 2013 6:34 am**

or 'concealed carry'....ewwww.

Posted: **Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:47 pm**

Owwwwww! That hurts just thinking about it. But what would have happened if she sneezed and the gun went off? I mean, which way was it pointing? Up or down?

Posted: **Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:41 pm**

how would you like to be the police office that had to remove it. you know they weren't going to let her handle a loaded concealed undeclared weapon. someone had to take the Gun out

Posted: **Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:23 pm**

and that is why they hire female cops(well, among other reasons, no doubt).....

Posted: **Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:12 pm**

callmeslick wrote:and that is why they hire female cops(well, among other reasons, no doubt).....

If I was a female cop and my boss told me to do it I'd tell him to go piss up a rope and then I'd put my pistol to her temple and tell her to take it out nice and slow....

Posted: **Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:06 pm**

Yeah, because threatening to shoot someone in the head at point blank range isn't overkill or anything. God forbid you just use rubber gloves in the trunk of your squad car to handle the gun...

Posted: **Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:07 pm**

Will Robinson wrote:
callmeslick wrote:and that is why they hire female cops(well, among other reasons, no doubt).....

If I was a female cop and my boss told me to do it I'd tell him to go piss up a rope and then I'd put my pistol to her temple and tell her to take it out nice and slow....

....and then you'd be dishonorably discharged from the force.

seriously dude, cmon. even if you're joking this is just dumb.

Posted: **Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:26 pm**

Ferno wrote:
Will Robinson wrote:
callmeslick wrote:and that is why they hire female cops(well, among other reasons, no doubt).....

If I was a female cop and my boss told me to do it I'd tell him to go piss up a rope and then I'd put my pistol to her temple and tell her to take it out nice and slow....

....and then you'd be dishonorably discharged from the force.

seriously dude, cmon. even if you're joking this is just dumb.

Well the whole conversation is just being silly but if you have ever been there when a couple of cops are surprised by a criminals concealed weapon you would know they draw their weapons on the suspect so my silly hypothetical isn't much of a departure from reality ...

But feel free to fire me from your fantasy police force if you think the hypothetical worlds are going to be endangered by my wreckless rogue cop persona! Lol

Posted: **Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:16 am**

I wouldn't fault the officers at all for drawing their weapons when discovering a concealed weapon, but I also wouldn't fault them for just standing there gobsmacked when confronted with this sort of "concealment."

Posted: **Tue Mar 12, 2013 5:10 am**

This brings a whole new meaning to dirty Harry

Posted: **Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:12 am**

What really gets me is that it was LOADED.

The potential there .... ugh.

Posted: **Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:53 am**

CUDA wrote:how would you like to be the police office that had to remove it. you know they weren't going to let her handle a loaded concealed undeclared weapon. someone had to take the Gun out

Hell, I'd think that having to reach in and remove a pistol from some woman prisoner's privates would be the penultimate wet dream for any male police officer! Much more preferable than pulling something from the other opening down there. Think about it boys.

Posted: **Tue Mar 12, 2013 5:51 pm**

Will Robinson wrote:Well the whole conversation is just being silly but if you have ever been there when a couple of cops are surprised by a criminals concealed weapon you would know they draw their weapons on the suspect so my silly hypothetical isn't much of a departure from reality ...

But feel free to fire me from your fantasy police force if you think the hypothetical worlds are going to be endangered by my wreckless rogue cop persona! Lol

Do the words "excessive force" mean anything?

you want to try NOT talking down to people who disagree with you for a change?

Posted: **Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:57 pm**

Seems like a rather silly question Ferno. Do you think Will, or any of the other nutjobs on this board, would have any second thoughts about using excessive force in just about any scenario? Hell, I bet these are the kinds of men that wish their state had a stand-your-ground law just so they could take someone out in the off chance they felt "threatened". They almost want the world to collapse into some sort of road warrior fantasy just so they can play out their fetish of guns and dog food. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think I'm too far off. One thing is for certain though: they all have incredibly small dicks.

Posted: **Tue Mar 12, 2013 10:17 pm**

Ferno wrote:...

Do the words "excessive force" mean anything?

you want to try NOT talking down to people who disagree with you for a change?

I didn't think I was talking down to anyone by pointing out that a cop will point a gun at a criminal when he discovers the criminal is hiding a weapon. And if the cop then tells the criminal to disarm himself I don't think that is excessive force, not even close....neither in fantasy land or in the real world.....whether they aim at the head or the center mass of the upper body it is deadly just the same.

So why are you so serious and easily offended by a silly comment in a silly thread anyway?

Posted: **Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:13 pm**

I'm not a police officer so I can't comment on the training, but I'm pretty sure that use of deadly force is discouraged unless there are extreme circumstances. Even when a suspect acts in a threatening manner, disarmament, not death, should be the focus. The fact a grown man thinks it is somehow funny to joke about disobeying orders and putting a gun to a woman's temple when he discovers a firearm in her vagina just boggles my mind. (It is obviously a greater threat to her than the officer.) The excessive macho violence reeks of insecurity (not to mention gynophobia). More of the weird, sick fantasy crap I see on this forum time and again.

Posted: **Wed Mar 13, 2013 6:43 am**

I get stopped by TSA agents all the time because they think I'm trying to smuggle a python aboard the plane..........

Posted: **Wed Mar 13, 2013 6:43 am**

woodchip wrote:I get stopped by TSA agents all the time because they think I'm trying to smuggle a python in my pants..........

Posted: **Wed Mar 13, 2013 7:32 am**

vision wrote:I'm not a police officer so I can't comment on the training, but I'm pretty sure that use of deadly force is discouraged unless there are extreme circumstances. Even when a suspect acts in a threatening manner, disarmament, not death, should be the focus. The fact a grown man thinks it is somehow funny to joke about disobeying orders and putting a gun to a woman's temple when he discovers a firearm in her vagina just boggles my mind. (It is obviously a greater threat to her than the officer.) The excessive macho violence reeks of insecurity (not to mention gynophobia). More of the weird, sick fantasy crap I see on this forum time and again.

You are just looking for an excuse to find fault.
The thread was clearly a silly one where we made silly comments.
The gun was in her vagina but not likely there as a means to commit suicide but rather as a way to hide it from authorities therefore a prudent officer wouldn't go into talk-the-jumper-off-the-ledge mode, but rather, into Oh ★■◆●, Gun!! mode.
And in spite of your illogical knee jerk reaction, pointing a gun at an armed suspect is NOT excessive or bad tactics. It is the right thing to do although head shots are bad tactics unless you are a sniper.

And the biggest part you missed was I preficed my comment with a bit of a protest on sexism in that if I was a female cop I might resent the male cops expecting me to assume all vagina weapon removal duty.

But you may ignore all the context of silly comments in silly thread and continue to prove I'm a rogue female cop with authority issues if that is the fantasy that suits you.

Posted: **Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:27 am**

CobGobbler wrote:Seems like a rather silly question Ferno. Do you think Will, or any of the other nutjobs on this board, would have any second thoughts about using excessive force in just about any scenario? Hell, I bet these are the kinds of men that wish their state had a stand-your-ground law just so they could take someone out in the off chance they felt "threatened". They almost want the world to collapse into some sort of road warrior fantasy just so they can play out their fetish of guns and dog food. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think I'm too far off. One thing is for certain though: they all have incredibly small dicks.

and you know this from personal experience.. Right.. Grow TF up

Will is right. I started this thread as a light hearted get away from the typical E&C BS. but as is the norm around here the same certain few need to come in and piss on it... Pathetic

Posted: **Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:37 am**

good intentions gone awry!

Posted: **Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:44 am**

Oh Cuda, why don't you go get some education? It's well known in psychology that men tend to overcompensate in terms of anger, guns, and even the car they purchase if they are insecure about their size. Given the fact that Will and a few others have to be Mr. Macho on every single issue, I'd say they probably fit into that group.

Posted: **Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:54 am**

callmeslick wrote:good intentions gone awry!

ya like I said

Posted: **Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:55 am**

CobGobbler wrote:Oh Cuda, why don't you go get some education? It's well known in psychology that men tend to overcompensate in terms of anger, guns, and even the car they purchase if they are insecure about their size. Given the fact that Will and a few others have to be Mr. Macho on every single issue, I'd say they probably fit into that group.

and its a well know fact on what they say about ASSuming.

Posted: **Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:06 am**

CobGobbler wrote:Oh Cuda, why don't you go get some education? It's well known in psychology that men tend to overcompensate in terms of anger, guns, and even the car they purchase if they are insecure about their size. Given the fact that Will and a few others have to be Mr. Macho on every single issue, I'd say they probably fit into that group.

Well considering I've scaled down from Porshe to used pickup truck, not been in a fight for over a decade and sold all my large caliber stuff and the last gun I bought was a .22 I guess my penis must be getting BIGGER!

So I'm going to go with that diagnosis

Posted: **Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:27 am**

< mod > Vagina-guns is an amusing diversion topic. Proper gun handling vs. overcompensation / machismo is a potentially legitimate topic.

Childish digs about penis size are neither. Keep it professional, boys. < /mod >

--------------

Back to the original topic, I'm wondering whether she thought it was the only place to hide the weapon when the police decided to make the search... or whether she was trying to get into the jail with the weapon for some reason...? I haven't seen anything to explain it.

Posted: **Thu Mar 14, 2013 5:54 am**

CobGobbler wrote:Oh Cuda, why don't you go get some education? It's well known in psychology that men tend to overcompensate in terms of anger, guns, and even the car they purchase if they are insecure about their size. Given the fact that Will and a few others have to be Mr. Macho on every single issue, I'd say they probably fit into that group.

Jealous ?

Posted: **Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:46 am**

No not really.

Posted: **Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:51 am**

Will Robinson wrote: So why are you so serious and easily offended by a silly comment in a silly thread anyway?

because it was a dumb comment coming from one of the more reasonable people here.

CobGobbler wrote:Oh Cuda, why don't you go get some education? It's well known in psychology that men tend to overcompensate in terms of anger, guns, and even the car they purchase if they are insecure about their size. Given the fact that Will and a few others have to be Mr. Macho on every single issue, I'd say they probably fit into that group.

ya know cob, we'd take that as a more genuine comment if you started using your original name again, instead of this alias you've been running lately.

Posted: **Sat Mar 16, 2013 12:35 pm**

Don't ruin his fantasy Ferno. it's much easier to run around incognito and pretending to be someone new then to actually being who you really are

Posted: **Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:05 pm**

He probably changed his name because he swore he would never post here again. Cob can change his name…but he can’t change his spots.

Posted: **Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:29 pm**

Ferno wrote:
Will Robinson wrote: So why are you so serious and easily offended by a silly comment in a silly thread anyway?

because it was a dumb comment coming from one of the more reasonable people here. ...

Well then you should definitely cut me some slack since it was my hypothetical angry female self who said it....hence the "If I was a female cop and my boss told me to do it..." preface to my dumb comment. I was trying to imagine my reaction. I guess I'm just another angry ★■◆● with penis envy at heart

Posted: **Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:34 pm**

Spidey wrote:He probably changed his name because he swore he would never post here again. Cob can change his name…but he can’t change his spots.

Ok, I'm curious now.
Isn't Cob really Adam something from the Twin Cities area aka 'meat puppet' aka 'the cope'? He's a musician and connoisseur of fine Asian ladies and angry drunk posting?

Posted: **Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:42 pm**

Will Robinson wrote:
Spidey wrote:He probably changed his name because he swore he would never post here again. Cob can change his name…but he can’t change his spots.
Ok, I'm curious now.
Isn't Cob really Adam something from the Twin Cities area aka 'meat puppet' aka 'the cope'? He's a musician and connoisseur of fine Asian ladies and angry drunk posting?

No, he is too coherent for meat/adam/the what. Cob is really Zuruck

Posted: **Sat Mar 16, 2013 5:13 pm**

woodchip wrote:
Will Robinson wrote:
Spidey wrote:He probably changed his name because he swore he would never post here again. Cob can change his name…but he can’t change his spots.
Ok, I'm curious now.
Isn't Cob really Adam something from the Twin Cities area aka 'meat puppet' aka 'the cope'? He's a musician and connoisseur of fine Asian ladies and angry drunk posting?
No, he is too coherent for meat/adam/the what. Cob is really Zuruck

Ding Ding Ding

Posted: **Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:01 pm**

CUDA wrote:
woodchip wrote:
Will Robinson wrote:
Spidey wrote:He probably changed his name because he swore he would never post here again. Cob can change his name…but he can’t change his spots.
Ok, I'm curious now.
Isn't Cob really Adam something from the Twin Cities area aka 'meat puppet' aka 'the cope'? He's a musician and connoisseur of fine Asian ladies and angry drunk posting?
No, he is too coherent for meat/adam/the what. Cob is really Zuruck
Ding Ding Ding

Ahh that makes more sense! And my memory of Adam is now restored to It's better place

Posted: **Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:29 pm**

Yea, should be easy to tell them apart…Meaty shows signs of actual talent and wit.

DescentBB

In the truth is stranger then fiction category

In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category

Re: In the truth is stranger then fiction category