DescentBB

While Obama and the left would have you believe Republicans and Red Necks are to be feared, it appears the liberals may be the real ones to watch out for.
Craig Stephen Hicks just killed 3 young Muslims. By his facebook page and groups he supports, he is clearly a rabid lefty. The only conundrum is why he is pro gun and owned a pistol. Makes one wonder how many other leftinista's are floating around and are closet gun nuts.

at least you acknowledge the existence of 'gun nuts'.

it wasn't religiously motivated, or political,as some earlier suggested. He was an atheist, and the whole mess apparently arose over a parking space dispute.
Sad, but yet again, a triumph for unabridged, mindless interpretations of the intent of the 2nd Amendment.

Apparently you do not know what you are talking about as no one yet knows what the guys motives are. "Apparently" means you don't have a clue. As to gun nuts, they are only nutty if a liberal owns them.

woodchip wrote:"Apparently" means you don't have a clue.

Are you confusing the words apparently and allegedly? Either way you are mis-defining them.

Not really vision, the way slick used "apparently" meant to imply that the issue arouse over a parking space. All I'm saying is we just don't know at this juncture.
You could probably use allegedly and have the better word.

I was going by a police briefing in NC, which was reported in my local paper's afternoon update. I used 'apparently' because I'll accept is as proven fact when shown to be so. Also, why, in the original post, did you lie and imply that Obama ever said a damned thing about fearing the right?

Apparently he is being investigated for a hate crime. Wonder if this case will get the DOJ involved and the press mongers going rabid like the Zimmerman case.

Slick why are you dragging the 2nd amendment into this? Are you implying all guns should be confiscated?
It seems over the last year or so you sometimes depend on that scenario and sometimes you fall back on better regulation and sometimes the Biden plan of 'you only need a shotgun' but not a ban on all guns.

So where do you stand today and how would the 2nd amendment under what you think is a 'superior interpretation' have prevented this shooting?

callmeslick wrote: Also, why, in the original post, did you lie and imply that Obama ever said a damned thing about fearing the right?

From his administration, threat assessment paper by DHS :

http://www.wnd.com/images/dhs-rightwing-extremism.pdf

and there was anything bogus about that threat assessment?

callmeslick wrote:and there was anything bogus about that threat assessment?

You asked for a example of fearing the right. I gave you one. Are you now going to try and parse your way out of it?

I asked for an example of Obama telling us to fear the right. You came up with a statistical analysis by a subdepartment.

now, Woody, that the facts are coming together, can you describe what was the least 'liberal' about this guy? And, further, how his singular actions conflate with professional law enforcement fears about right wing GROUPS of people?
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/sus ... ar-AA9jhSw




in other words, you've lied again, followed by a stretch of the truth, now answer to those FACTS.

woodchip wrote:

callmeslick wrote:and there was anything bogus about that threat assessment?

You asked for a example of fearing the right. I gave you one. Are you now going to try and parse your way out of it?

As if you expected any more of him... Lol!
He constantly asks for a 'source' so as to imply the point raised is a false one.
Then, when provided with one, he tries to disqualify it on what ever basis he can pull out of his rear end.
'I never heard of him around here'...'those people aren't of any standing'...'Oh that's just the Obama administration, not Obama himself'.

Its those amazing debate team skills he's so proud of.

callmeslick wrote:now, Woody, that the facts are coming together, can you describe what was the least 'liberal' about this guy? And, further, how his singular actions conflate with professional law enforcement fears about right wing GROUPS of people?
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/sus ... ar-AA9jhSw




in other words, you've lied again, followed by a stretch of the truth, now answer to those FACTS.

And how is this a stretch that he is liberal:

"His Facebook Likes included the Huffington Post, Rachel Maddow, the Southern Poverty Law Center, Freedom from Religion Foundation, Bill Nye “The Science Guy,” Neil deGrasse Tyson, Gay Marriage groups and similar progressive pages."

As for his motivations, from his facebook page:

“If your religion kept its big mouth shut, so would I. But given that it doesn’t, and given the enormous harm that your religion has done in this world, I’d say that I have not only a right, but a duty, to insult it, as does every rational, thinking person on this planet.”

You should try reading more than the first paragraph or two of your link.

woodchip wrote:"His Facebook Likes included the Huffington Post, Rachel Maddow, the Southern Poverty Law Center, Freedom from Religion Foundation, Bill Nye “The Science Guy,” Neil deGrasse Tyson, Gay Marriage groups and similar progressive pages."

just like mine have likes to the GOP national committee, about 5 right wing bloggers, 6 conservative magazines or foundations, and about 25 friends with definite right-wing leanings. Some people like stuff because they like to see how folks who disagree with them think. Swing again, you missed big-time on that at-bat.

See how all this plays out. If the guy had right wing links the press would of been all over him. Now slick, go and find where he had a number of right wing links on his page. You're batting air now.

woodchip wrote:See how all this plays out. If the guy had right wing links the press would of been all over him. Now slick, go and find where he had a number of right wing links on his page. You're batting air now.

I don't really care about his FB habits......says nothing about HIS thinking, which ever more reports cite as batcrap crazy, and obsessed over(as I pointed out seemed 'apparent')parking spaces. I would point that out, and so would any responsible press reportage,no matter what websites he bookmarked or FB pages he liked. In fact, I find the fact that anyone reported it a bit sensationalistic, but that's the way 'journalism' works in a 24-hour news cycle.