DescentBB

The great liberal sponsor George Soros, who financially backed 30 some groups to agitate for civil unrest in Furgeson, must be feeling eminently satisfied today with the shooting of 2 police officers there. How about you? Are you also satisfied?:

In all, Mr. Soros gave at least $33 million in one year to support already-established groups that emboldened the grass-roots, on-the-ground activists in Ferguson, according to the most recent tax filings of his nonprofit Open Society Foundations.

and, that had ANYTHING to do with those cops being shot, how, again? As the Justice Dept investigation showed, there was a systematic abuse of the policing upon black citizens, most recently as a seeming fundraising measure, that has been going on for decades. That sort of crap breeds ANGER, and it doesn't take any 'activist' group or (in the case of virtually all of those groups Soros funds) political empowerment, social welfare or educational groups to promote anything. The anger was there. The anger is what caused the initial unrest. Oh, 33 million to 30 groups, all of which have dozens, sometimes hundreds of ongoing projects means that Mr. Soros dropped may 35,000 or a bit more into Ferguson. Not that major a contribution, frankly.

too bad Soros didn't drop that money to help improve the schools in Furgeson.

woodchip wrote:too bad Soros didn't drop that money to help improve the schools in Furgeson.

how do you know that wasn't precisely some of the effort of the groups he funds? I strongly suspect it is, frankly. The Soros rants always amuse me, because most ranters haven't the first clue what the man's money goes to fund. They have just heard the right-wing drivel and never bother to follow up with details or get informed. Are you any different? If so, prove it.

oh, and Woody, while you're at the task of educating yourself, come back and try to explain how ANY of those groups had ANYTHING to do with two cops getting shot.

callmeslick wrote:

woodchip wrote:too bad Soros didn't drop that money to help improve the schools in Furgeson.

how do you know that wasn't precisely some of the effort of the groups he funds? I strongly suspect it is, frankly. The Soros rants always amuse me, because most ranters haven't the first clue what the man's money goes to fund. They have just heard the right-wing drivel and never bother to follow up with details or get informed. Are you any different? If so, prove it.

It is up to you, since you're questioning it, to find the answers...just like I do when you make some totally unsubstantiated comment.

callmeslick wrote:oh, and Woody, while you're at the task of educating yourself, come back and try to explain how ANY of those groups had ANYTHING to do with two cops getting shot.

Sure, by agitating and riling up the crowd. Just like Rev Al has some responsibilities for his rhetoric as do the news media that promoted the "hands up don't shoot" lie.

what specific group 'riled up and agitated' the crowd? What member of that crowd pulled the trigger? You make goofy charges with ZERO substance to back them up. Go back and find us real information and then your thread here wouldn't be a joke. So far, I have to laugh at the lack of insight.

With the backing of national civil rights organizations and Mr. Soros‘ funding, “Black Lives Matter” grew from a hashtag into a social media phenomenon, including a #BlackLivesMatter bus tour and march in September.

“More than 500 of us have traveled from Boston, Chicago, Columbus, Detroit, Houston, Los Angeles, Nashville, Portland, Tucson, Washington, D.C., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and other cities to support the people of Ferguson and help turn a local moment into a national movement,” wrote Akiba Solomon, a journalist at Colorlines, describing the event.

http://themissouritorch.com/blog/2015/0 ... -ferguson/

also:

http://themissouritorch.com/blog/2014/0 ... ext-month/

In the end slick, you still look like a ass for your ongoing defense of the liberal left and their agenda's

woodchip wrote:With the backing of national civil rights organizations and Mr. Soros‘ funding, “Black Lives Matter” grew from a hashtag into a social media phenomenon, including a #BlackLivesMatter bus tour and march in September.

and, this led to people shooting cops, how?

“More than 500 of us have traveled from Boston, Chicago, Columbus, Detroit, Houston, Los Angeles, Nashville, Portland, Tucson, Washington, D.C., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and other cities to support the people of Ferguson and help turn a local moment into a national movement,” wrote Akiba Solomon, a journalist at Colorlines, describing the event.

wow, scary bunch. How many were armed? How many participated in ANY violence?

once again, links to groups hot and bothered that others around the nation and world care about the blatant discrimination in Missouri, really doesn't bolster your assertions, at all. Plus, you cite ONE group. Where are these 30 groups you mentioned at the outset? I mean, 'the Missouri Torch' bloggers are probably more of a hazard to civilized society than anyone you've cited with Soros ties.

Your turn to disprove. I showed where agitators funded by Soros stirred up sentiments against the police. Ever hear the term "Incite to riot".? Do you think if the agitators weren't there that the cops would of still been shot?

http://www.insidephilanthropy.com/wall- ... soros.html

note the subsection on education. While mainly around getting minorities into higher ed, he does support efforts from pre-K thru 12.
Worth reading the whole thing, written by a pro-philanthropy site. It is informative, and renders Soros a bit of a bugaboo to you all, if you dig even deeper.

Now you are trying to obfuscate and temporize. Because some of his money went to education doesn't mean that his agitators did any the less damage.

you haven't proven to any extent whatsoever that they did, and you asked why he didn't contribute to schools. You sure haven't come remotely near proving your initial assertion, that Soros is in ANY way responsible. Compare any effect you can actually prove with 2 decades-plus of systematic racial discrimination on the heels of 75 years of Jim Crow laws preceded by slavery, and tell me where the anger is really rooted, and why it might still surface readily.......yeesh!

You still haven't provided links disputing my assertion and link that Soros was not providing money to groups agitating for unrest in Furgeson. Perhaps you should try out for Dancing with the Stars.

you haven't shown the EXISTENCE of any group agitating for violence against police, let alone funded by Soros, or in any way linked to the shooters.

Wow it really bugs you when I'm right. How can there be a link to the shooters when there are no arrests? Keep trying, your dance technique is starting to look interesting.

try the first part, then. What group came to town and advocated for violence against police? What link did they have to Soros?

Oh come on slick, you'll be the first one to understand you don't have to agitate for violence to get violence. Do try and be a bit more of a sophisticate.

I'm plenty sophisticated for my tastes, and your assertion reeks of bad assumptions. Feel free to provide proof, as requested, or I'll assume I can identify what the reek reminds me of......