Page 1 of 1
Off to jail?
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:31 pm
by woodchip
Seems dear sweet Hillary committed a felony by asking to have classified tags removed:
"On the June 17, 2011, email chain with senior State Department adviser Jake Sullivan, Clinton apparently asked Sullivan to change the marking on classified information so that it is no longer flagged as classified."
If this is true, I wonder if she'll try to keep her candidacy alive while she is going to trial. To bad the Dems put all their betting money on Hillary.
Re: Off to jail?
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:55 pm
by woodchip
Re: Off to jail?
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:18 pm
by callmeslick
woodchip wrote:Seems dear sweet Hillary committed a felony by asking to have classified tags removed:
"On the June 17, 2011, email chain with senior State Department adviser Jake Sullivan, Clinton apparently asked Sullivan to change the marking on classified information so that it is no longer flagged as classified."
If this is true, I wonder if she'll try to keep her candidacy alive while she is going to trial. To bad the Dems put all their betting money on Hillary.
highlighted the salient part, which should be included in most of your wild-guess efforts.
Re: Off to jail?
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:21 pm
by woodchip
And you have a source that says it isn't.
Re: Off to jail?
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:21 pm
by callmeslick
nice link! Imbedded in the 'news' article(which was entirely speculation) is a link to the evenhanded piece--The Pallid Prince, why Bill won't Save Hillary.
boy the panic machine is moving into high gear! Save Hillary? From what....her 18 percent lead over Sanders or the fact that she would hammer the GOP candidate in the General?
Re: Off to jail?
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:22 pm
by callmeslick
woodchip wrote:And you have a source that says it isn't.
I need a 'source' to disprove speculation by authors who clearly have an ax to grind? Nice try.Why don't we just wait until she is sworn into office on the steps of the Capitol and then agree that what you posted was delusional claptrap. Until then, I'll try to chuckle quietly, so as not to disturb your reverie.
Re: Off to jail?
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:38 pm
by woodchip
callmeslick wrote:woodchip wrote:And you have a source that says it isn't.
I need a 'source' to disprove speculation by authors who clearly have an ax to grind? Nice try.Why don't we just wait until she is sworn into office on the steps of the Capitol and then agree that what you posted was delusional claptrap. Until then, I'll try to chuckle quietly, so as not to disturb your reverie.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/08 ... kings.html
I suggest you google a little first before trying to sweep this under the rug. why don't we wait and see how this plays out, maybe even see her on the steps of a federal facility wearing a orange pant-suit.
Re: Off to jail?
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:01 pm
by Nightshade
callmeslick wrote:nice link! Imbedded in the 'news' article(which was entirely speculation) is a link to the evenhanded piece--The Pallid Prince, why Bill won't Save Hillary.
boy the panic machine is moving into high gear! Save Hillary? From what....her 18 percent lead over Sanders or the fact that she would hammer the GOP candidate in the General?
Breaking the law is a badge of honor held in high esteem by democrats. It's a plus for Hillary.
Re: Off to jail?
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:36 pm
by Tunnelcat
Nightshade wrote:Breaking the law is a badge of honor held in high esteem by democrats. It's a plus for Hillary.
Conservatives are constantly saying that the laws of the land don't apply to them ...........when necessary.
Re: Off to jail?
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:32 pm
by woodchip
And the Clintons constantly prove the same thing.