DescentBB

You want it straight? Okay. You're a liar and a hypocrite, and I can prove it. Now stop getting offended by straight talk.*


*a bit of poe's law is in play in the premise, and it's to sum up the article.

More delusional rhetoric. After all, Obama turned out to be a big liar ( most transparent presidency anyone?, Like your doctor you can keep your doctor) and he got relected. Just goes to show you how easy the low information democratic voters can be led by the nose.

woodchip wrote:Just goes to show you how easy the low information democratic voters can be led by the nose.

The author of the piece is Matt Walsh, who is not in any way a "low information democratic voter".

Ferno got the piece from me, and I'm also not a "low information democratic voter".

Did you vote for Obama in 2012?

in the last 4 presidential elections, I voted for Bush, Bush, McCain, and Romney.

Then how did you get I was calling you a low information voter?

You were criticizing the article that Ferno posted -- which he got from me, and which was written by definitely-not-a-democrat Matt Walsh. I'm just pointing out that the "low information democratic voter" trope doesn't work because of that.

(FWIW Ferno also didn't vote for Obama in 2012, or 2008.)

I stated a opinion of the article. Then I went to go on to show how the article was only a opinion in time and then showing how liberal voters were taken in just as bad as the Trumps voters are.

And isn't Ferno Canadian?

may the farce be with you:
https://www.facebook.com/EmpireSaberGui ... 2/?fref=nf

Now that's funny.

WOW, Matt Walsh, a conservative with an actual brain.

Only because, TC, you agree with what he says...this time

Because, the man is 100% right and I'll even agree with a conservative, when he's right.

woodchip wrote:More delusional rhetoric. After all, Obama turned out to be a big liar ( most transparent presidency anyone?, Like your doctor you can keep your doctor) and he got relected. Just goes to show you how easy the low information democratic voters can be led by the nose.

well, no. It's talking about how fans and supporters of trump, who have become rather rabid, have misplaced anger about issues surrounding politics, and how self-deceptive those people can be.

The more intensly dismissive the reaction to this article is (especially from those who support trump), the more the reaction reinforces and proves the articles' point.

It would be what's called self-evident truth.

--------------

Lothar wrote:(FWIW Ferno also didn't vote for Obama in 2012, or 2008.)

True. Physical, national and legal impossibility.

I suggest Ferno, you look at the spread of demographic in the Nev. election. If you keep thinking everyone is crazy, pretty soon you have to question your own sanity.

woodchip wrote:I suggest Ferno, you look at the spread of demographic in the Nev. election. If you keep thinking everyone is crazy, pretty soon you have to question your own sanity.

all you have to really look at is one stat: 80% of the voters in the GOP caucus self-described as either very angry or somewhat angry. Citing certain demographics, such as black(2% of electorate) or hispanic(5%) is silly. We're talking about the angry older white guy vote. Over 80 percent in Nevada were white, more than 70 percent were over the age of 45.

And was SC 80% white?

woodchip wrote:And was SC 80% white?

over that, in GOP turnout.

edit--96% white
http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/21/this- ... op-voters/

woodchip wrote:I suggest Ferno, you look at the spread of demographic in the Nev. election. If you keep thinking everyone is crazy, pretty soon you have to question your own sanity.

everyone? no. just that small segment.

A Challenge to Trump Supporters: defend his conservatism.

This is why Trumptards are voting for him:

"Ban the Muslims!"

"Build a big beautiful wall!"

"Get rid of the Mexicans!"

"Make America great again!" (By supposedly doing the aforementioned...)

If pressed for details on any of those points, Trump offers nothing.

He's using the empty vessel of platitudes just as Obama used his "hope and change" to get elected.

Nightshade wrote:This is why Trumptards are voting for him:

"Ban the Muslims!"

"Build a big beautiful wall!"

"Get rid of the Mexicans!"

"Make America great again!" (By supposedly doing the aforementioned...)

If pressed for details on any of those points, Trump offers nothing.

He's using the empty vessel of platitudes just as Obama used his "hope and change" to get elected.

Yep. Trump was asked yet again this morning to give specifics and details on all his "solutions" and nothing but empty promises and retoric flow out of his mouth, laced with a good dose of profanity and insults. No details whatsoever, just crap, crap, crap. Just as liberals have been disappointed with Obama's empty promises, Trump is eventually going to end up as massive letdown to his conservative fans, if he's elected, which IS a possibility now unfortunately.

Trumptards, that's a good one NS.