Page 1 of 1
New York Times Portrays Islam More Negatively Than Cancer
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 10:11 pm
by Nightshade
...because *SHOCKER,* islam IS a cancer on humanity.
The unreformed scourge of islam will continue to kill, maim, destroy and subjugate people as long as we allow it to.
https://pjmedia.com/homeland-security/2 ... epage=true
It's funny to hear that the leftist New York Times is being called out for being "islamophobic."
Re: New York Times Portrays Islam More Negatively Than Cance
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 8:23 am
by woodchip
And yet you are Trumpaphobic.
Re: New York Times Portrays Islam More Negatively Than Cance
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 2:22 pm
by Tunnelcat
NS wants a smart warrior, not a crazy egomaniac running the military.
Re: New York Times Portrays Islam More Negatively Than Cance
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 2:39 pm
by woodchip
And smart is kissing ass and spreading the border cakes wide?
Re: New York Times Portrays Islam More Negatively Than Cance
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 1:47 pm
by Tunnelcat
First off, I'm not defending Obama. I've already had my buyer's remorse. Second, being
smart is about engaging the brain's gears before opening one's mouth. Smart is someone who knows when to use force and when to use diplomacy. Diplomacy isn't even in Trump's vocabulary judging from his rallies. Trump is a loose cannon with a big mouth, a temper to match and an ego the size of Manhattan. Face reality woody. His border wall is a pipe dream that we can't afford and Mexico will never, ever pay for. It's all empty rhetoric. Immigrants come here because business people like Trump have a constant demand the cheap labor they provide, so they keep hiring them and encouraging more of them to come here. All those glorious Trump promises are nothing but empty ones he'll
never be able to keep. You WILL have buyer's remorse, just as a whole lot of Dems had buyer's remorse with Obama and will have buyer's remorse if they elect Hillary.