DescentBB

....are apparently something Trump DOES understand:
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ ... li=BBnb7Kz

"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain."

Accused? Easy to do. Was it a fact? Harder to prove. Did he have the FBI investigating him? No

Oh and it is official now, Hillary's assertion the FBI is doing a "security review" is just so much smoke to confuse the Hillary lovers (which is easy to do). Federal judge has stated:

"The privacy interests at stake are high because the government's criminal investigation through which Mr. Pagliano received limited immunity is ongoing and confidential," U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan wrote in an order issued Tuesday.

While she is innocent until proven guilty, she should still step down as the presumptive nominee ( if this was a republican the press would be in a uproar demanding they step down)

woodchip wrote:Accused? Easy to do. Was it a fact? Harder to prove. Did he have the FBI investigating him? No

hmmm, it was a civil suit, but why is it harder to prove or any less factual?

Anyone can accuse someone of anything. Unless it was proven then it is just so much hot air... Like when Reid accused Romney of not paying taxes.

Woody.. always ragging on hilliary deleting her emails, but defending trump's deletion.

the hypocrisy is so thick, you need a spoon to scoop it out.

woodchip wrote:Anyone can accuse someone of anything. Unless it was proven then it is just so much hot air... Like when Reid accused Romney of not paying taxes.

So Hillary operates under those same assumptions, right?

Slick, read my earlier reply where I said she is innocent until proven guilty...just as the shooter was.