Page 1 of 1

Viewing bull★■◆● as profound...

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 8:17 pm
by Ferno
is associated with people who favour Trump et al.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/articl ... ne.0153419

Re: Viewing **** as profound...

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:20 am
by Nightshade
Ferno wrote:is associated with people who favour Trump et al.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/articl ... ne.0153419
I guess you viewed that bull***t as profound.

Re: Viewing bull★■◆● as profound...

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 5:48 pm
by Ferno
In this contribution, bull★■◆● is used as a technical term which is defined as communicative expression that lacks content, logic, or truth from the perspective of natural science.
As seen in this thread, the response by thunderbunny reinforces the linked study.

Re: Viewing bull★■◆● as profound...

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 6:07 pm
by Spidey
Wow, 196 people…

Talk about profound bull★■◆●.

I continued to read, but when my boots were submerged, I had to stop.

Re: Viewing bull★■◆● as profound...

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:12 pm
by Ferno
oh, so what you're saying is, you think the sample size is too small, and you didn't read the whole thing?

Re: Viewing bull★■◆● as profound...

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:30 pm
by vision
Ah yes, I've seen this kind of study done before. It's becoming quite popular, probably because it's funny, easy to reproduce, and produces reliable results. I'm sure well have a meta-study on these in no time.