Page 1 of 1
The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:21 pm
by Nightshade
...civilians in Syria:
The Anti-Imperialism of Fools
As U.S. warplanes are accused of killing almost 200, the left, which normally deplores such events, hasn’t said a word.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... fools.html
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:39 pm
by Tunnelcat
That's nothing. Bush's Iraq War count is estimated between 800,000 and 1.3 million Iraqis. So Bush is responsible for about one million dead, 1-2 million widows, 5 million orphans and approximately 4.5 million people displaced, of which only 5% have returned to the still unstable country. Sure beats Obama's collateral damage all to hell, even though drone killings are just as reprehensible. And Americans wonder why people in the Middle East hate our guts. Maybe that's why Republicans have been calling Obama a wimp. He's not killed enough people for their satisfaction.
http://web.mit.edu/humancostiraq/HOW%20 ... 0BUSH.html
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:36 pm
by Spidey
I don’t think shade’s point was about who racked up more kills…
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:47 pm
by Vander
Muslims are bad unless their death can make Obama look bad. Got it.
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2016 5:40 pm
by Nightshade
Vander wrote:Muslims are bad unless their death can make Obama look bad. Got it.
And Vander must act like an obtuse retard with a single moronic comment and not contribute to the discussion. Got it.
"muslims" are not bad. islam is! Get it right.
Obama is a murderous hypocrite. Get that?
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2016 5:51 pm
by Ferno
Looks like this thread is done.
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2016 6:02 pm
by Nightshade
Spidey wrote:I don’t think shade’s point was about who racked up more kills…
More like left wing hypocrisy as usual.
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2016 8:29 pm
by Vander
Nightshade wrote:the discussion
You were discussing something? Where? You should use words if you would like to discuss something. Perhaps tell us how you feel about something, and then ask others to weigh in.
Or do we simply read Breitbart to find out your opinion?
So what exactly were you trying to discuss? The fact that civilians are killed when we drop bombs? My lack of suitably expressed outrage that these specific people have died as compared to other specific people? That we are dropping bombs at all in the first place? That we haven't gone all in on the next country on the neocon regime change checklist?
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2016 8:58 pm
by Nightshade
Muslims are bad unless their death can make Obama look bad. Got it.
So where did I say that 'muslims are bad?' Why the fake narrative of 'racist xenophobe' (which is the strawman you're injecting by default into your little snide comment?)
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2016 9:09 pm
by Tunnelcat
Nightshade wrote:Spidey wrote:I don’t think shade’s point was about who racked up more kills…
More like left wing hypocrisy as usual.
No, you point out the evil deeds of the current liberal president you revile, but you tend to whitewash and forget about those same evil deeds that the previous leader from the
Republican party committed. In fact, they were worse because he started those killings based on lies he told the American people. So, it's only bad to you NS when a liberal president does it now? What hypocracy. It's not a contest either, because all these innocent deaths are abhorrent, no matter which leader commits them. I think what Obama's doing with his little not-so-secret standoff drone war is chickensh*t. If you're going to fight a war, you need to have a stake in that war, so that war is rarely a palatable option.
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2016 10:32 pm
by Vander
Nightshade wrote:So where did I say that 'muslims are bad?' Why the fake narrative of 'racist xenophobe'
Well we sure wouldn't want any fake narratives in a thread titled "The Obama Administration murders yet another 200."
I don't want people on the other side of the world to die because a bomb I paid for fell on their home for some policy that somehow represents me and my fellow citizens. I won't always show the same outrage when one person dies compared to another, for a multitude of reasons. Sometimes I'm paying attention, sometimes I'm not. Sometimes I care more about a person or a cause than another. I'm hypocritical. Sometimes I'm aware of it, sometimes I'm not.
So what do you want to discuss? The missed opportunities to send arms to people? The pros and cons of air strikes vs invasion? Or the varied levels of complaining people on "the left" do?
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 12:26 am
by vision
Nightshade wrote:"muslims" are not bad. islam is! Get it right.
I'm pretty sure you don't know what you are saying here. Think again about what you wrote and try and understand why that statement doesn't make sense.
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 1:42 am
by Nightshade
vision wrote:Nightshade wrote:"muslims" are not bad. islam is! Get it right.
I'm pretty sure you don't know what you are saying here. Think again about what you wrote and try and understand why that statement doesn't make sense.
muslims <> islam the same way Christians <> Christianity
One can separate the individual from the religion or ideology they're under.
I am pretty sure most muslims "believe" in islam because they were born into it.
They have no clue there is any other way to live until they are exposed to other ideas.
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 4:55 am
by woodchip
I wonder why we do not see Code Pink running around the White House perimeter protesting the war.
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 2:10 pm
by Jeff250
Ferno wrote:Looks like this thread is done.
Fortunately Vander handled it like a pro.
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 2:17 pm
by Tunnelcat
woodchip wrote:I wonder why we do not see Code Pink running around the White House perimeter protesting the war.
They haven't been quiet about this issue either. You obviously don't watch the news enough. So you didn't like them protesting at Trump's little coronation? Tough. They're equal opportunity protestors who happen to believe what Obama is doing is a war crime too.
http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nbc-news/55122996/
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/ ... -war-crime
https://mic.com/articles/25334/drone-st ... n-hearings
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 4:03 pm
by vision
Nightshade wrote:One can separate the individual from the religion or ideology they're under.
I am pretty sure most muslims "believe" in islam because they were born into it.
They have no clue there is any other way to live until they are exposed to other ideas.
Are you sure about this?
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 4:11 pm
by Ferno
Jeff250 wrote:Ferno wrote:Looks like this thread is done.
Fortunately Vander handled it like a pro.
With his own brand of snark and biting sarcasm.
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 4:23 pm
by Nightshade
Jeff250 wrote:Ferno wrote:Looks like this thread is done.
Fortunately Vander handled it like a pro.
Like a pro troll, sure.
Re: The Obama Administration murders yet another 200
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 6:36 pm
by callmeslick
woodchip wrote:I wonder why we do not see Code Pink running around the White House perimeter protesting the war.
don't get out much do you? They feel that all Dems and GOP together are warmongering cretins.