DescentBB

...a silent, modestly dressed Muslim immigrant woman is going to the one to finish off Donald Trump.
You get it, don't you Nightshade? Don't like it much, but I'll bet my bottom dollar that you get it.........


I predict that slowly, but eventually, Ryan will cave to the issue and finally cut any support, tacit or otherwise. He may even fall on the electoral sword and come out and urge other Republicans to join him. McConnell likely will not, as he is at the end of his political career. The public outcry that is building seems VERY resounding. Trump was already in deep crap with veterans from my witness down in Virginia. Tonight, the Afghanistan/Iraq vets organization absolutely blasted him. Goodbye, funny man.....it's going to be blast watching.

What did you expect from a bully with a potty mouth? Something nice? Makes one wonder how long Trump can insult people before he runs out of people who will listen to him.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... story.html

My Scottish brethren are far better at this sort of thing, but what an absolute douchenozzle.

Trump is lucky to be in the position he's in. From what he's said to what he's done, he wouldn't be able to even run a ★■◆●ing cash register if he was any other man.

he really is the physical embodiment of an internet troll.

Still clutching at straws eh slick. Trumps view on building a wall a year ago was going to do him in also. Look how well that idea turned out.

as I showed yesterday with the always-accurate Princeton histograph, Trumps chance of victory was dwindling. He will be finished by the time the Sunday shows get done with him today. Grasping at STRAWS, Woody?? Now, I am forced to doubt your service to your nation, which you claim. You are supporting someone who:
1.Called a POW from Vietnam, not 'my idea of a hero'
2. Called our military a 'disgrace'
3. Insulted a mother of a fallen soldier and insinuated he had sacrificed as much as a gold star family.

Every veteran I know has just turned on him along with most major veterans organization.

a Muslim, immigrant, woman!!!!!!

once again, the nation owes her a debt of gratitude. #TrumpSacrifices, my ass.

I virtually never watch Sunday Morning political shows. Today, I can't wait to cycle through the public disembowelment of Woody's boy.

callmeslick wrote:as I showed yesterday with the always-accurate Princeton histograph, Trumps chance of victory was dwindling. He will be finished by the time the Sunday shows get done with him today. Grasping at STRAWS, Woody?? Now, I am forced to doubt your service to your nation, which you claim. You are supporting someone who:
1.Called a POW from Vietnam, not 'my idea of a hero'
2. Called our military a 'disgrace'
3. Insulted a mother of a fallen soldier and insinuated he had sacrificed as much as a gold star family.

Every veteran I know has just turned on him along with most major veterans organization.

I suggest you look up how Hillary treated the military when she was first lady. Also doing a quick search I'd say your imaginary veteran friends are in the minority:

In an online poll SOFREP surveyed over two thousand people with one simple question, Trump or Clinton. The results were overwhelming, with 913 responses, and 89% of veterans and active duty U.S. military choosing Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton as the next President of the United States.

https://sofrep.com/46244/sofrep-poll-sa ... r-hillary/

913 respondents, with no real attempt at reflection of the whole? Seriously?

oh, and treating the military? More lies from the proven liars you've previously cited?

Did she ever dismiss the heroism of a POW or any combat veteran?.
Did she ever call a 4 star Marine general a 'failure'?
Did she ever insult a Gold Star family?
Did she ever suggest that her sacrifices equated to losing a child in military service?


go to it, Woody, and references please, because the Orange Baboon did all of those, in public view, recorded for posterity, in the past 8 months.

callmeslick wrote: 913 respondents, with no real attempt at reflection of the whole? Seriously?

I guess when you have nothing to show you do the only thing slick is good for...laugh at the methodology. And like I pointed out before, a 1000 respondents is the average for all polls. Keep laughing and making up things, come Nov. we will all be interested to see how you could of been so wrong.

as I said the other day. Watch. That poll was outdated, and we'll see new ones, no doubt, after the last few days and conventions.
Watch and wait. The Clinton side knows how to win elections. Trump? As Paul Begalia said to Jeffery Lord the other night, after Clinton's speech, in response to the predictable crowing about beating 16 mediocre GOP candidates:
'this is like the Decathalon, a series of very separate events. Your guy won the javelin....he throws the javelin as well as anyone ever. However, we've moved to the Pole Vault, and he is still back there throwing a javelin' (note--probably misspelled javelin, as it doesn't look right, but.....)

Clinton knows how to win elections? You daft man? How well did she do in 2008 against a nobody.

watch and wait. The people able to beat her in 2008 now WORK FOR HER.

this just in: VFW issues a blanket statement of disgust, sent to all members, about EVERYTHING Trump has said about vets.
Further, a Gold Star family letter is circulating, and in a really bad schedule for Trump, Obama is about to address DISABLED vets.
Legs for this issue? More like turbo boost, aiming the Buffoon into the toilet of history, hopefully dragging his troglodyte followers with him.

you should read, Woody, the short and very pointed notes I'm getting from vets I've fished with(many via Project Healing Waters).....lot's of 'you were right, sad to say' stuff, and the word 'deal-breaker' seems to be the shared phrase from every last one of them. Nice political move from the savvy expert who says, 'Vets love me'.

watch and wait, Woody.

And I'm saying, for vets, Hillary is way worse than Trump. But yes, lets wait and see.

how so, Woody?
She clearly has more respect when discussing them.
She clearly holds our military, as it currently exists in high esteem.
She supports planning for climate change that the troops know impacts readiness.
She never called a POW, 'not what I call a hero'

so where is the danger? Because 4 American's died during her tenure at State? The lowest rate of fatalities of civilian personnel in many administrations(since Carter, at least). Did she oversee a rise in deaths in combat? No. Would, perhaps, a woman in charge of the VA lead to better care? Maybe. Where is this 'danger' that does not pale beside a clearly disturbed, rash man committed to destroying NATO, and possessing exactly ZERO foreign policy experience?

woodchip wrote:And I'm saying, for vets, Hillary is way worse than Trump. But yes, lets wait and see.

They're both bad. Don't vote for either.