BLM is awesome!
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 4:30 am
The innocent that was shot:
Police chief Ed Flynn said members of a Chicago chapter of the Revolutionary Communist Party turned what had been a peaceful night into a tense one by leading marchers down several blocks at around 11:30 p.m.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) says Hillary Clinton's response to the unrest occurring in Milwaukee is only making the situation worse.
"I think comments like that are just inflaming the situation," Walker told "Fox and Friends" Tuesday morning.
Are you refuting the police chiefs statement? Were you there or are you just venting?vision wrote:Good grief, the communism boogeyman again? What is this, 1966?
the whole point is that TC and I are reading about THIS situation and not jumping to bogus conclusions based on one past example.woodchip wrote:TC, I know there is a lot more too it, I was just replying to slicks lame assertion no one was leading them on. Read up on the Detroit riots and you'll see they started over false rumors and stories.
Woody, sometimes that's all it takes to start a fire, especially a fire that's already smoldering. The Communists are only filling the vacuum that the fire is creating. That's how revolutions get started. Find a disenchanted segment of the population and then proceed to stoke the fires of violent change. It's so easy when everyone is riled up. It's too bad everyone's corralled themselves into group think in this country, instead of coming together toward with the goal of finding a lasting solution to the poverty and violence that permeates poor, black communities all around the country.woodchip wrote:TC, I know there is a lot more too it, I was just replying to slicks lame assertion no one was leading them on. Read up on the Detroit riots and you'll see they started over false rumors and stories.
there is validity to both the above, AND TCs points. Yes, there are changes that law enforcement could make for the better, and there are government programs that can assist. You do, however, have to have a proper attitude within the community in regard to the will to make it all work for the best.Spidey wrote:Yea, and as long as these communities keep waiting for someone to solve their problems…
“If we just had another program”.
And how well is letting millions of illegals in that take jobs from those in poor black communities working?tunnelcat wrote:So you think that they should just solve their problems on their own? Never mind that the police keep shooting people who are poor, stuck in gang cultures and can't find good jobs or receive good educations? Just let the problem fester? I see that's working well.
whenever that actually happens, we'll know. Because, at present, any suggestion that it is would be another lie.woodchip wrote:And how well is letting millions of illegals in that take jobs from those in poor black communities working?tunnelcat wrote:So you think that they should just solve their problems on their own? Never mind that the police keep shooting people who are poor, stuck in gang cultures and can't find good jobs or receive good educations? Just let the problem fester? I see that's working well.
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/20 ... immigrantsThe decline in work has particularly affected those under age 29, and the less-educated, who are the most likely to be in competition with immigrants. A study by the economist George J. Borjas and others found that immigration reduces the employment of less-educated black men. Another study came to the same conclusion. A recent analysis by Federal Reserve economist Christopher Smith (2012) found that immigration reduces the employment of U.S. teenagers.
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/3 ... -j-delgadoInstead, Democrats are chucking aside black voters in their rush to lock in the Latino vote (or so they’re hoping). Taken for granted as a given come election-time, blacks are now actively harmed as the Democrats vow to grow their voting base through importing more and more of what they see as future blue-voters. It’s the husband who leaves his wife of 30 years: ‘We had a good run, honey, but I’ve found someone new.’
Considering that after 1808 when importing slaves became illegal, 50,000 smuggled African slaves became the first illegal immigrants to this country. The illegal immigrant problem has been going on in some form or fashion since that time, all from various other countries. I know it's not an answer, but I don't have answer for a problem that's been going on for hundreds of years backed by American business interests and which no one has adequately addressed in either business or the government. All I can say is that it's our own greedy fault for the mess were in.woodchip wrote:And how well is letting millions of illegals in that take jobs from those in poor black communities working?tunnelcat wrote:So you think that they should just solve their problems on their own? Never mind that the police keep shooting people who are poor, stuck in gang cultures and can't find good jobs or receive good educations? Just let the problem fester? I see that's working well.
So again show me where the lie is. Discounting your usual Dem loving rhetoric, who cares what hillary is polling at among blackscallmeslick wrote:no evidence again. A bunch of guesswork and aspersions cast. The second part is freaking HILARIOUS! I guess she can afford to 'cast aside' the black vote seeing as how she's polling at around 99% support, nationwide.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? ... id=1562148Abstract:
The employment rate of black men, and particularly of low-skilled black men, fell precipitously between 1960 and 2000. At the same time, their incarceration rate rose. This paper examines the relation between immigration and these trends in employment and incarceration. Using data from the 1960–2000 US censuses, we find that a 10% immigration-induced increase in the supply of workers in a particular skill group reduced the black wage of that group by 2.5%, lowered the employment rate by 5.9 percentage points, and increased the incarceration rate by 1.3 percentage points.
http://sf.oxfordjournals.org/content/88/3/1393.abstractU.S. immigration policies after 1965 fueled a rise in the Latino population and, thus, increased the competition for low-skill jobs. We examine whether Latino immigration and Latino dominance of low-skill industries increases black urban violence. Using city-level data for the year 2000, we find that (1. Latino immigration is positively linked to urban black violence, (2. the link is most prevalent where blacks lost ground to Latinos in low-skill markets, (3. not all low-skill sectors operate in unison; black violence rises only when jobs in agriculture, manufacturing and construction are in short supply and, (4. Latino immigration raises black violence by first increasing black unemployment. We discuss the implications of these findings.
I dunno, perhaps because none of the other groups you mentioned had to suffer through two centuries' worth of thralldom, and then another century's worth of de facto thralldom?Spidey wrote:And the obvious question is…why are blacks still at the low end in such large numbers.
We weren't discussing if any party was at fault. We are not gullible enough not to be able to see you are trying to change the dynamics of the thread because I showed where you hadn't a clue as to what we were discussing. You could just say you didn't know and I'd look more favorably on you.callmeslick wrote:your statistics show ZERO correlation to either party, Woody. We aren't all gullible enough to buy that argument.
I wonder how many black people you've mentioned this to, Will... er, I mean... woodchip.woodchip wrote:I'd say it appears black people are easily lead by the nose...
So just to be clear, black people are easily led by the nose? That's what you are saying, right?woodchip wrote:Only to those people who are afraid to face up to reality.
That's what I said. Now give me your best shot.vision wrote:So just to be clear, black people are easily led by the nose? That's what you are saying, right?woodchip wrote:Only to those people who are afraid to face up to reality.
you are either African American, or otherwise, you are a bigot.woodchip wrote:That's what I said. Now give me your best shot.
Now what is false about this statement?I'd say it appears black people are easily lead by the nose...no wonder the Dems get them to vote for them