DescentBB

The left as personified by the likes of slick constantly harp on how Trump supporters are racist/homophobic/islamophobic/xenophobic. What I'd like to see is proof of this. What I can point out is a speech Trump gave to a all black Detroit congregation and got standing ovations. Have yet to see something similar by Hillary Clinton. But lets see how Hillary supports viewed Bernie:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?c ... id=2029508

Or a blogger Hillary had to cut ties with:
Karen Civil, a popular blogger-turned motivational speaker is in hot water for tweeting homophobic and anti semitic slurs.

So as I see it, the Dems are more racist/homophobic/islamophobic/xenophobic than any Trump supporter.

It's funny as hell watching you stretch reality.

Funny as hell watching you unable to come up with anything.

too easy
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ ... li=BBnbfcL

I have been posting a list of proven deplorable support statements, acts by the campaign and words of the candidates and platforms, elsewhere. I think I'm up to example #47 and haven't been working too hard. I chose not to do so here, but if you wish, Woody........

So some Dem makes up the poster and somehow make believe is now part of your realty....priceless

And on the other side :

Ku Klux Klan Grand Dragon Will Quigg Endorses Hillary Clinton for President

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/201 ... -president

Oh, my gawd, you really ARE that stupid. First off, the guy was on the California ballot as an ELECTOR for Trump and got outed, then in the very article you quote, he gives THIS as his reason:

"When asked about the "hidden agenda," Quigg said, "I cannot reveal my sources.”
When the Telegraph asked Quigg why he reneged on his promise to support Trump in the race, he replied: "We don’t like his hair. We think it’s a toupee. He won’t do what he says he will do. He says he’s going to build a 20-foot high fence along with border with Mexico and make them pay. How’s he going to do that?"


and, you accept this as legitimate? I repeat, you really ARE that stupid, aren't you?

and we can make that #2 here, Woody, at least 5 electors nationwide for Trump at the convention with PROVEN white supremecist ties.

callmeslick wrote:

Oh, my gawd, you really ARE that stupid. First off, the guy was on the California ballot as an ELECTOR for Trump and got outed, then in the very article you quote, he gives THIS as his reason:

"When asked about the "hidden agenda," Quigg said, "I cannot reveal my sources.”
When the Telegraph asked Quigg why he reneged on his promise to support Trump in the race, he replied: "We don’t like his hair. We think it’s a toupee. He won’t do what he says he will do. He says he’s going to build a 20-foot high fence along with border with Mexico and make them pay. How’s he going to do that?"


and, you accept this as legitimate? I repeat, you really ARE that stupid, aren't you?

Sounds more like he was a Dem plant. Nice try tho. And the next time you want to call me stupid just look in a mirror while doing so.

callmeslick wrote:and we can make that #2 here, Woody, at least 5 electors nationwide for Trump at the convention with PROVEN white supremecist ties.

Show proof or you are just herf derfing again

I'll go locate that one, since you asked, and we can all ponder THESE plums:
http://americannewsx.com/hot-off-the-pr ... eetsvideo/

callmeslick wrote:I'll go locate that one, since you asked, and we can all ponder THESE plums:
http://americannewsx.com/hot-off-the-pr ... eetsvideo/

Are you like desperate? Your link is no better than the link I made showing the Hillary supporters smearing Sanders and his faith. Keep coming up with crap links and I'm sure you will impress the gullible types here.

glad you find equivalancy.

it will be interesting to see how many(or few) actually buy this chest beating and histrionics. That is the downside of all that airtime. Suburban America, who decides every election has SEEN the rallies. We've read the posts by supporters for a year. We know Clinton was pretty damned close to reality.

We know in fact Hillary is delusional. Too bad she only gets a handful of supporters at her rallies while Trump draws thousands. What is really delusional are the people who think she has this locked up.

When the uber racist David Duke says this about you, you're on the fringe.

https://thinkprogress.org/former-kkk-le ... 945968cd09

Then there's Trump's own racist history. Sounds like the kind of guy who would attract racist voters. It's all in Trump's code words when he speaks to his flock. Besides, when was the last time you saw more than a handful of black or Hispanic people at a Trump rally?

http://fortune.com/2016/06/07/donald-tr ... sm-quotes/

the women are starting to get mad, and this sums it up:

Yep. This whole episode and conspiracy crap is pissing me off enough to actually make me consider voting for Hillary as a spite vote against Trump. Be very careful Trumptards. You're starting to piss off more and more of the women voters.

tunnelcat wrote:When the uber racist David Duke says this about you, you're on the fringe.

https://thinkprogress.org/former-kkk-le ... 945968cd09

Then there's Trump's own racist history. Sounds like the kind of guy who would attract racist voters. It's all in Trump's code words when he speaks to his flock. Besides, when was the last time you saw more than a handful of black or Hispanic people at a Trump rally?

http://fortune.com/2016/06/07/donald-tr ... sm-quotes/

Oh wow. That's like Hitler saying to Ghandi: "You are too intense".

I'm just on the floor from the irony.

apparently, while the Donald was doing his daily lying in Baltimore, trying to paint the handful of supporters that are cops and the like as 'deplorables', the real folks Hillary was talking about were attempting to beat up peaceful protestors.

Unlike the protestors trying to beat up Trump supporter? If you want to compare numbers of assaults you will lose.

I saw the video(I get Baltimore TV stations at one house). It was obvious who was aggressive.
Oh, and I got a glimpse of the rough draft of the LBGT speech last week:

Jared Taylor, from the white supremacist group called "American Renaissance" really has the hots for Trump. That should say everything about where some of Trump's supporters stand and why they want Trump as president.

then again, we have the deplorable candidate hisownself:

So who's "deplorable" now? A bunch of racist Trump supporters, or some really serious sh*t being thrown around by this guy if Trump doesn't win? I take insult that a bunch of nutty and sore loser fringe Republicans would resort to violence just because they don't like liberals and their policies. Well, we liberals have had to live with the fruits of the Reagan Revolution for decades now, so all you extreme conservatives will have to suck it up if Trump loses, and by God, I hope he loses.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/kentucky-gov ... 58821.html

Don't know what your beef is TC, The Dems have been using violence and intimidation during the elections.

I think Trump would be happier if he had a team of mexican gardeners, a team of women maids, a team of black servants and dozens of low skilled workers fetching him mail and other menial tasks.

Sure would make me happier.

callmeslick wrote:the women are starting to get mad, and this sums it up:

No. That is extreme lust for power. She's a psychopath that cares about nothing other than getting into the highest office in the land because it's "owed" to her.

I'll go ahead and assume that you pulled your psychology diploma out of a Cracker Jack box, then?

Hey look, a great reason to lock this thread.

meanwhile on Planet Reality:
http://wlos.com/news/local/69-year-old- ... -supporter


worth noting, Pence grovelled in DC yesterday, trying to rally Congressional Republicans to lambast the 'Deplorables' comment. None would. The topic then only got brought up in the presser, where he tried to say David Duke was NOT an example of someone Hillary referred to. Sad, but tells a person that the experts know where this is all ending up.

woodchip wrote:Don't know what your beef is TC, The Dems have been using violence and intimidation during the elections.

what on Earth are you talking about. I've worked elections in 4 states, for over 30 years. NEITHER side has EVER used violence or intimidation that I've ever seen, or heard reported.

I guess you never been outside a Trump rally where your thugs are beating on and throwing things at Trump supporters.

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/watch- ... ten-front/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... ide-rally/

And lets not forget the famous pic SEIU thugs knocking down a black tea party supporter:

so these were instruments of the Dems huh? Surprised you didn't do the standard reach to New Black Panthers. I stand by my statement. NEITHER party even suggests using such tactics, until, perhaps now............and, it isn't the Dems calling for post-election violence and bloodshed(Gov Matt Bevin, Trump supporter), or suggesting mass 'oversight' of elections(violation of previous standing court ruling from the last time the GOP tried it....oops, I overlooked that in my generous assessment above!).

And it is not the Republican party nor Trumps organization calling for it either.

woodchip wrote:Don't know what your beef is TC, The Dems have been using violence and intimidation during the elections.

But only Trump has been actually been encouraging his people to resort to violence, whether it his supporters or a few Dem supporters that are the ones starting it. Not Hillary, not Bernie, not Jeb, not Rubio, nor any of the other recent presidential candidates. It's called having a lack of decorum befitting a presidential candidate.

It's called, after your supporters have been attacked numerous times, time to stop laying down and taking it.

woodchip wrote:It's called, after your supporters have been attacked numerous times, time to stop laying down and taking it.

this is either a fantasy or an outright lie.