Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250
P.S. Without translation, because I think you can translate better.Russian Defense Ministry has made a "last warning" to US military about the consequences of the application of blows to the position of the Syrian government troops
No TC. You don't want to vote for Hillary. She will continue the path to WWIII that Obama has us on (provided it doesn't break out before the next president takes office.)tunnelcat wrote:I guess we'd better not vote for Trump/Pence then if we don't want WWIII. Pence declared during the debates that he'd be tough on Russia and go ahead and bomb Syrian forces to save civilians no matter the consequences.
Hillary is a post menopausal woman who's probably on estrogen hormone therapy in order to keep active. She'd be pretty passive, unless she's gone cold turkey, in which case all bets are off.Nightshade wrote:No TC. You don't want to vote for Hillary. She will continue the path to WWIII that Obama has us on (provided it doesn't break out before the next president takes office.)tunnelcat wrote:I guess we'd better not vote for Trump/Pence then if we don't want WWIII. Pence declared during the debates that he'd be tough on Russia and go ahead and bomb Syrian forces to save civilians no matter the consequences.
Tump will back off. He sounds a lot more isolationist/pacifist in military matters despite his supposed xenophobia.
Yes, the left side where slick calls home.callmeslick wrote:note, only one side of the US spectrum is frothing at the mouth.
Seems slick has no idea what is the Russian mentalitycallmeslick wrote:precisely, TC. And Russia doesn't exactly have endless cash for this little project, either.
Never too late to learn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brother_2 Listen, Slick, don't you think, when you protect USA from a sense of false patriotism, you're protecting a handful of high-ranking american maniacs who constantly crave human blood, which created, sponsored, and continue to contribute to the spread of terrorism around the world from the world's largest epicenter of the terrorist threat, constantly justifying and consoling himself by so-called national interests of the USA and the mythical Russian aggression, which is just a journalistic malarkey in the best traditions of the tabloids? You are able to understand what you are today to support and justify the ideology of terrorism?callmeslick wrote:Afghanistan?
nosigma wrote:Listen, Slick, don't you think, when you protect USA from a sense of false patriotism, you're protecting a handful of high-ranking american maniacs who constantly crave human blood, which created, sponsored, and continue to contribute to the spread of terrorism around the world from the world's largest epicenter of the terrorist threat, constantly justifying and consoling himself by so-called national interests of the USA and the mythical Russian aggression, which is just a journalistic malarkey in the best traditions of the tabloids? You are able to understand what you are today to support and justify the ideology of terrorism?callmeslick wrote:Afghanistan?
you and NightShade have to get together for nachos. Seriously, you do.If you will start now to talk about the brutal suppression of dissidents today as in Russia, as in the United States, as in the Middle East , it is better not to think about it because it's really very similar to the prewar state of the world before the great war, as in 1938-39 the last century.
Now of course you find it hard to imagine that for you burger with radioactive rats will seem like a gift of the Lord God, if you can survive after the first explosions and very soon fight for survival for food and water in the shelter...
that you nitwits didn't learn anything, apparently. What your response has to do with that eludes me.So what were you saying about Afghanistan?
In other words, you think it is American democracy. In this case, you have no right to even to hint about "the dictators" in other countries because you are yourself living in a totalitarian state so that you are forced to lie even to himself.callmeslick wrote:nosigma wrote:Listen, Slick, don't you think, when you protect USA from a sense of false patriotism, you're protecting a handful of high-ranking american maniacs who constantly crave human blood, which created, sponsored, and continue to contribute to the spread of terrorism around the world from the world's largest epicenter of the terrorist threat, constantly justifying and consoling himself by so-called national interests of the USA and the mythical Russian aggression, which is just a journalistic malarkey in the best traditions of the tabloids? You are able to understand what you are today to support and justify the ideology of terrorism?callmeslick wrote:Afghanistan?
That is, you refuse to accept reality for what it really is. Why I am not surprised.callmeslick wrote:you and NightShade have to get together for nachos. Seriously, you do.sigma wrote:If you will start now to talk about the brutal suppression of dissidents today as in Russia, as in the United States, as in the Middle East , it is better not to think about it because it's really very similar to the prewar state of the world before the great war, as in 1938-39 the last century.
Now of course you find it hard to imagine that for you burger with radioactive rats will seem like a gift of the Lord God, if you can survive after the first explosions and very soon fight for survival for food and water in the shelter...
It looks like you're not even able to understand what you see in the mirror.callmeslick wrote:that you nitwits didn't learn anything, apparently. What your response has to do with that eludes me.sigma wrote:So what were you saying about Afghanistan?
